Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Roadrunner7671]

lynch me

It's settled!

If you can provide a good reasoning for my last post then I'll even self vote

What do you want me to address that you feel like I haven't already addressed?

[schadd]

lynch me

It's settled!

If you can provide a good reasoning for my last post then I'll even self vote

no heck off with that mess

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

Um...how have I used it against you more than once? It was in my case because of your response to it.
PPE

Yeah

First, Jake expresses agreement.

sorry

Then, he apologizes. That's called appealing to emotion.

I think

In the game where TWM, mcmc and I were scum, mcmc gave TWM some newbie scum advice: Always say 'I' and never say 'you,' because you'll sound less accusatory.

may

Not committing himself so he can still seem innocent/on the fence.

RR may be scum here.

Scum is going to agree with literally any wagon on any towny because we're at MyLo. If a newbie player is on/supporting of a wagon, it should be regarded with more suspicion than usual. And I'm not calling Jake a newbie to Mafia, I'm calling a newbie to an Ashersky setup.

I also

He says I again!

also

Expresses agreement again.

a numbers perspective he's been scum a lot recently (M94 etc) and I doubt that he can be scum so many games in a row.

This argument is invalid and I strongly suspect Jake knows that.

I doubt

He says I yet again.

(M94 etc)

Even with his invalid argument, he only gives one example of LaLight being scum 'so many games in a row.'


Conclusion: Jake is scum.

ppe LOTS

This is post 171 from ZM23 in it's exact form.

[Roadrunner7671]

This is post 171 from ZM23 in it's exact form.

So? I'm not using it this game.

And I think you're forgetting that in that game, you were in fact scum.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

This is post 171 from ZM23 in it's exact form.

So? I'm not using it this game.

And I think you're forgetting that in that game, you were in fact scum.

YOU USED IN YOUR CASE AGIANST ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Boy what are you? If it's this good can I get some?

[schadd]

he was using it as a point of comparison

[Roadrunner7671]

This is post 171 from ZM23 in it's exact form.

So? I'm not using it this game.

And I think you're forgetting that in that game, you were in fact scum.

YOU USED IN YOUR CASE AGIANST ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Boy what are you? If it's this good can I get some?

Yes, that case was in my case this game. However, I'm not citing that case as evidence, I'm showing how you approach cases as scum, then I'm pointing out that you're doing the same thing here.
PPE

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

This is post 171 from ZM23 in it's exact form.

So? I'm not using it this game.

And I think you're forgetting that in that game, you were in fact scum.

YOU USED IN YOUR CASE AGIANST ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Boy what are you? If it's this good can I get some?

Yes, that case was in my case this game. However, I'm not citing that case as evidence, I'm showing how you approach cases as scum, then I'm pointing out that you're doing the same thing here.
PPE

Wait you just said this "So? I'm not using it in this game" and then said "I'm showing how you approach cases as scum" which means I'm using it in this game. WHICH IS IT???

[schadd]

he was using it as a point of comparison

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

he was using it as a point of comparison

[Roadrunner7671]

This is post 171 from ZM23 in it's exact form.

So? I'm not using it this game.

And I think you're forgetting that in that game, you were in fact scum.

YOU USED IN YOUR CASE AGIANST ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Boy what are you? If it's this good can I get some?

Yes, that case was in my case this game. However, I'm not citing that case as evidence, I'm showing how you approach cases as scum, then I'm pointing out that you're doing the same thing here.
PPE

Wait you just said this "So? I'm not using it in this game" and then said "I'm showing how you approach cases as scum" which means I'm using it in this game. WHICH IS IT???

I'm not using the case. If I was using the case, then I'd just be restating the points I used in that case, like I'd be saying you appeal to emotion and are hedgy and stuff like that. Like I said, I'm showing how you approach cases as scum, then I'm pointing out that you're doing the same thing here. 
PPE 2

[Roadrunner7671]

Okay, Jake's right. That doesn't make my point less valid, but it does stop this discussion.

[schadd]

lalight don't read this next part


his next post is gonna be something like "omg they're ganging up on jake scumteam locked now final answer but also all the rest of you are kinda scummy and i might vote you at some point idk"

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

Whatever I give up. Congrats RR on another mislynch hope this will be informative for lynching RR and Awaclus over the next two days. Good Luck town. Vote: Jake

Lol schadd Good luck dealing with RR tomorrow if your still alive (i doubt it)

[SpaceAnemone]

lynch me

It's settled!

If you can provide a good reasoning for my last post then I'll even self vote

no heck off with that mess

Reading because I'm having trouble sleeping. Also because all the things are happening in the middle of the night again. Please don't let me wake up to a derphammer, or even an overenthusiastic schadd-hammer.

Space Count (5 to lynch):
RR (2): TWM, Jake
Jake (1): RR
Not Voting (5): kkrieg, LL, Awaclus, Space, schadd

To my sleepy brain, Jake is making less sense than RR, but earlier I'm sure I thought RR was the scummier one. Will re-read when I've achieved the sleep thing and woken up again.

PPE: my count is invalid already :-( Someone else do one?

[SirMartin]

/tag

[schadd]

i'm beginning to believe that i'm a town god, town god

[schadd]

would like to have a fireside chat with space

[Roadrunner7671]

Oh, an TWM, if we lynch scum today, obviously jail LaLight tonight.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

Oh, an TWM, if we lynch scum today, obviously jail LaLight tonight.

Jail RR or awaclus tonight because you won't lynch scum.

[schadd]

Oh, an TWM, if we lynch scum today, obviously jail LaLight tonight.

i still think we lynch lalight over jake today. i think both of them confirm the other one (jake is doing his standard partner thing with lalight, "nah i think {point of evidence} is wrong and they're just town" and jake is the only person that would be worse off to do the kill than lalight) and lalight has uh night action evidence to support. not like jake doesn't have day stuff to support him though—as i said in M92,

don't die for an awaclus read.

obv jail the element of {jake, lalight} that we don't lynch

[The_Wine_Merchant]

Oh, an TWM, if we lynch scum today, obviously jail LaLight tonight.

Cause I am taking advice on this subject from the person I am voting for?

[The_Wine_Merchant]

Ps. Jake and RR I am not reading all of the above posts. Give me a tl;dr in a paragraph or less summarizing all of those posts.

[Roadrunner7671]

Ps. Jake and RR I am not reading all of the above posts. Give me a tl;dr in a paragraph or less summarizing all of those posts.

tl;dr, there is evidence that Jake is scum.

[Roadrunner7671]

Ps. Jake and RR I am not reading all of the above posts. Give me a tl;dr in a paragraph or less summarizing all of those posts.

tl;dr, there is evidence that Jake is scum.

But you really should read the thread.