I don't really see how the mafia looking distrustful of you would make them look like town. They're going to end up voting for someone (most likely), and it seems to me that, generally, the people who start up the wagons get the bulk of the suspicion when that person turns up town.
A wagon against me has very VERY legitimate claims due to the way that I have posted. So if they do get a successful lynch on me and if I do turn up town, they base their vote on the nature of my posts thus detracting from the fact that town was lynched.
Why would you equate a call for scrutiny scumminess? What reasons have you provided for anyone to trust you; shouldn't we all be distrustful of one another? Why do you choose to deflect attention to others rather than answer the concerns already directed towards you?
I just wanted to raise a point that assuming I'm town, mafia could act accordingly and start a relatively safe wagon due to the nature of my posts. To address you assertation of me deflecting attention rather than answering concerns, in complete honesty, I don't have any clue how to address them. My first few mafia posts here were rather "on the fly" and I didn't think very much. This was especially true of my vote on Frisk where I read timchen's previous post and within 10 seconds, had thought to myself, "Hey, why not get things started?" I guess one thing I can say is that currently, you have no reason to trust me whatsoever, but perhaps a lynch on me/cop investigation can make these past few pages be read from my point of view.
So, S_B, should C_F assume one of (or both of) you and timchen are Mafia? Or what happens if three townies each get two votes on them? Then by your logic there should definitely be three Mafia. I understand that when someone votes for you, you want to think that they're Mafia, but the odds are not in your favor in that regard.
I don't think Frisk should assume that timchen or I am mafia. It depends on the context of the votes. i.e. Scummy vs. Baseless. I seem scummy, so votes against me were purposeful and directed and not without reason. Other votes, like the one's on CF are not grounded in fact, thus should not be taken in the same light as the votes placed against me. Not to say that a mafia wouldn't do something like that. I just want to point out that I don't think 2 votes on someone automatically equates one of them as being mafia.