Oh! This is what I get for catching up on things after replying to posts. I see I drew a yuma vote with no explanation! How scummy is that, theorel?
(answer: not very, actually.)
That was my thought. I thought I had a good point, and he agreed with it.
I didn't read your posts as so much as agreeing with Teproc as confirming him.
For example, he said (paraphrasing here and going from memory, I'm not looking them up because I'm lazy)
"does anyone else think this is scummy from anti-claim yuma?" and you said "yes, scum-yuma."
Then, sometime later, he accused yuma of discrediting him, and OMGUS, and you said "Oh, uh this is a scum-yuma trait"
Oh uh. This is actually a scum!yuma trait.
What is ?
What you also said/pointed out. scum!yuma throws up his hands and says things that have a subtext of "then I quit" or "I'm taking my ball and going home". town!yuma gets frustrated too but I feel like they are very very different and not so hard to tell apart.
I know yuma likes to say "but I would do that as town too" about things he's done when scum but man it doesn't work that way.
Honestly, I'm still a bit confused by this because you claim Teproc had said/pointed that out...But he didn't. Teproc never commented on yuma's petulance.
Which is pretty much what I'm finding you scummy for, it seems like you're confirming Teproc's suspicions without actually considering the basis of those suspicions. I mean, no one else agreed with (particularly) yuma being scummy for advancing a plan for a potential SK-townie convert. So it really felt like you just prodding Teproc into continued suspicions.
Also, why did you comment about your wagon dying? Given that no one who has voted for you has voted elsewhere, that looks a bit survivalist to me. Trying to convince everyone your wagon died when nothing's changed.