1. Don't wait, wagon was only 2. (Or if you've really not read at all, don't come into the game intending to vote for a default person.)
2. "Enlightening but NAI." So not enlightening. Long paragraph to come up with nothing.
3. The "I agree with faust, by the way" (by gkrieg) was actually an interesting moment, because it had seemed like gkrieg was arguing against faust.
4. If you think this was fluff to look engaged then award scum points!
5. I felt I disagreed with it when I first read it, but I don't know really. Maybe it's ok.
6. gkrieg was saying that you were joking about being anti-town (wanting people to stop posting), not that being jokey is anti-town.
7. Taking my line completely out of context, like it was a read. Ok, that one's the most subjective because it's about my own post. Maybe no-one else got what I was on about either.
So there we go. I've numbered them and would say:
(3), (6) and (7) are just differences in understanding.
(1) and (4) are anti-town, unless they (along with (2) and (5)) are part of some hidden agenda to buddy faust and malign MiX, in which case they are scummy.
1. I wasn't holding off because the wagon was "already up to 2". It was because there were already about 40 posts when I first read and posted, and it definitely seemed to be moving beyond RVS. Look at past games, and you'll find I almost always post early and almost always vote MiX in RVS. I just didn't feel that was appropriate here anymore. But even through my brief mobile reading, my gut was saying vote him anyway, but I wanted to reread before I did that. I did reread. I did follow up with a vote for him.
2. NAI this game, yes. Still enlightening, helping me see some individual thoughts, and insights into individual metas and the f.ds mafia meta in general. I know my posts have maybe sounded like I care nothing about meta-play, and have just said "screw it, I'll play my way". But I am still (and probably always will be) trying to find some reasonable balance between those two.
3. I had been mobile reading/skimming, and didn't pick up that gkrieg was arguing with faust, so I guess that's why it didn't stand out as important to me at the time. Thanks for clarifying.
4. Fair enough point. Maybe I should have.
5. *thumbs up!*
6. I misunderstood. Makes sense now. Thanks for clarifying.
7. Based on other replied since, I believe I wasn't the only one to misunderstand or take it out of context. Oh well... moving on.