Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34  All

Author Topic: Through the Ages online  (Read 197847 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9413
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #775 on: October 20, 2015, 02:52:46 pm »
0
Anyone else?...
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9413
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #776 on: October 20, 2015, 02:56:21 pm »
0
Also:  Search for "2.4" in the finished games, you can see what BGO will look like... when they decide to make it public.
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

XerxesPraelor

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1069
  • Respect: +364
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #777 on: October 20, 2015, 03:51:57 pm »
0
I'd play, but I don't quite understand the format. I've played on bgo, but this would be a Play-by-forum?
Logged

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9413
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #778 on: October 20, 2015, 07:08:21 pm »
0
Quote from: XerxesPraelor on October 20, 2015, 03:51:57 pm
I'd play, but I don't quite understand the format. I've played on bgo, but this would be a Play-by-forum?

Yes.  See, for instance:

http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=6951.0
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

XerxesPraelor

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1069
  • Respect: +364
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #779 on: October 20, 2015, 10:21:40 pm »
0
I'll play - that looks reasonable.
Logged

ipofanes

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1439
  • Shuffle iT Username: ipofanes
  • Respect: +776
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #780 on: October 21, 2015, 03:44:10 am »
0
I'd be eager to try it, but I fear the additional hassle of the interface. My hope is in BGO.

Logged
Lord Rattington denies my undo requests

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
  • Respect: +3349
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #781 on: October 22, 2015, 04:46:53 pm »
+1
The interface isn't as good as BGO, sure, but it works. Anyway, I'm going to work on updating my sheet for the new version at... some point? Maybe Saturday. So hopefully game can start this weekend.
Logged
Quote from: Witherweaver on October 29, 2014, 03:10:13 pm
Quote from: Donald X. on October 28, 2014, 04:29:33 pm
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

Jack Rudd

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1325
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jack Rudd
  • Respect: +1384
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #782 on: October 22, 2015, 05:08:54 pm »
0
/in
Logged
Centuries later, archaeologists discover the remains of your ancient civilization.

Evidence of thriving towns, Pottery, roads, and a centralized government amaze the startled scientists.

Finally, they come upon a stone tablet, which contains but one mysterious phrase!

'ISOTROPIC WILL RETURN!'

Thisisnotasmile

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1493
  • Respect: +676
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #783 on: October 24, 2015, 07:34:06 am »
+2
I am also interested in "coming out of retirement"* from F.DS to take part in new edition games of TTA once it's up on BGO. Not interested in PBF one bit I'm afraid.

*Not that I ever retired, I just lost interest in Dominion and then the TTA games dried up so I had no real reason left to come here.
Logged

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
  • Respect: +3349
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #784 on: October 26, 2015, 02:52:53 pm »
+1
Okay, so unfortunately (for you lot, less unfortunate for me) I had a bunch of fun stuff going on this weekend, so uh obviously the game hasn't started yet. But I have been working on changes and updates to the spreadsheet. I think I'm almost done, but won't be starting tonight. Here's what I have currently (ignore the names at the bottom, they're names from the... first ever game? Not certain but also have no reason to change them). Right now I've implemented the tactics board on the overview page, and have updated the civil cards. Military deck might take a while. I've also updated a bunch of other things like corruption trackers on the first board, Watno's I believe - but the other boards shouldn't take too long to fix up as well.

Anyway, there's still space for one more if anyone is interested. Right now I see Kuildeous, Xerxes and Jack Rudd as /in, if anyone else whose expressed interest wants to be now is your chance.
Logged
Quote from: Witherweaver on October 29, 2014, 03:10:13 pm
Quote from: Donald X. on October 28, 2014, 04:29:33 pm
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
  • Respect: +3349
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #785 on: October 27, 2015, 05:06:52 pm »
0
Alright, I have everything ready. There's still one or two cards I want to be checked (mainly Plunder which might only cost 1 MA in all ages now, not 100% certain) before I start, but otherwise, this is pretty much a last call to join.
Logged
Quote from: Witherweaver on October 29, 2014, 03:10:13 pm
Quote from: Donald X. on October 28, 2014, 04:29:33 pm
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9413
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #786 on: October 27, 2015, 06:36:05 pm »
0
Wooooooooooo!
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9413
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #787 on: October 27, 2015, 06:37:29 pm »
0
Quote from: Tables on October 27, 2015, 05:06:52 pm
Alright, I have everything ready. There's still one or two cards I want to be checked (mainly Plunder which might only cost 1 MA in all ages now, not 100% certain) before I start, but otherwise, this is pretty much a last call to join.

According to the doc I linked earlier, Plunder is 1/2/2 MA in Ages I/II/III respectively.
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
  • Respect: +3349
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #788 on: October 27, 2015, 06:39:23 pm »
0
Quote from: Kirian on October 27, 2015, 06:37:29 pm
Quote from: Tables on October 27, 2015, 05:06:52 pm
Alright, I have everything ready. There's still one or two cards I want to be checked (mainly Plunder which might only cost 1 MA in all ages now, not 100% certain) before I start, but otherwise, this is pretty much a last call to join.

According to the doc I linked earlier, Plunder is 1/2/2 MA in Ages I/II/III respectively.

Yes, that's what I've been using for the most part. But it's not 100% accurate and that's why I want the age I and II checked in particular.
Logged
Quote from: Witherweaver on October 29, 2014, 03:10:13 pm
Quote from: Donald X. on October 28, 2014, 04:29:33 pm
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

AHoppy

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 978
  • Respect: +529
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #789 on: November 23, 2015, 10:29:01 am »
0
Game 118 up
Logged

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9413
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #790 on: January 01, 2016, 05:19:09 pm »
0
Quote from: Thisisnotasmile on October 24, 2015, 07:34:06 am
I am also interested in "coming out of retirement"* from F.DS to take part in new edition games of TTA once it's up on BGO. Not interested in PBF one bit I'm afraid.

*Not that I ever retired, I just lost interest in Dominion and then the TTA games dried up so I had no real reason left to come here.

It's here!  It's here!  It's like a bonus Christmas!
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9413
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #791 on: January 01, 2016, 05:20:39 pm »
0
New game 1 is up!
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

Thisisnotasmile

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1493
  • Respect: +676
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #792 on: January 01, 2016, 06:11:30 pm »
0
As promised, I'm in!
Logged

AHoppy

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 978
  • Respect: +529
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #793 on: January 02, 2016, 12:36:19 am »
0
Me too me too!
Logged

Watno

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2745
  • Shuffle iT Username: Watno
  • Respect: +2983
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #794 on: January 02, 2016, 06:07:04 am »
0
Hosted game 2
Logged

Watno

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2745
  • Shuffle iT Username: Watno
  • Respect: +2983
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #795 on: January 03, 2016, 05:58:59 pm »
0
Need one more player
Logged

Watno

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2745
  • Shuffle iT Username: Watno
  • Respect: +2983
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #796 on: January 14, 2016, 11:26:06 am »
0
With game 2 in Age III, i hosted game 3, for 3 players this time.
Logged

Watno

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2745
  • Shuffle iT Username: Watno
  • Respect: +2983
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #797 on: January 14, 2016, 07:46:07 pm »
0
I accidentally hosted 2 games and can't delete one. ipofanes already joined "Watno W's game", so please take this one and ignore "f.ds New #3"
Logged

Watno

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2745
  • Shuffle iT Username: Watno
  • Respect: +2983
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #798 on: January 19, 2016, 07:19:13 pm »
0
The game timed out due to not filling, I hosted it again.
Logged

ipofanes

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1439
  • Shuffle iT Username: ipofanes
  • Respect: +776
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #799 on: January 20, 2016, 04:22:04 am »
0
/in and started.
Logged
Lord Rattington denies my undo requests
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34  All
 

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 21 queries.