Jimmmmm:D1:I had a bunch of quotes pulled up...but then my computer refreshed and I lost all the stuff I pulled up. I was leaning "Hesistant Town" before the refresh. Now where was I...
Okay. So yet again I have put myself in a situation where I have very few solid reads and it'll be a real struggle to really get myself into the game prior to more things happening that I actually pay attention to when they happen. I've repeatedly shown that having stretches of disengagement from the game is not an alignment-tell for me, and while that's not a reputation that I'm comfortable with, it keeps coming back to me - I need to be more consistent with putting effort into games that I've signed up for.
So, here's where I'm at right now. I'm still up for lynching Andrew. I still don't want to lynch yuma or ash. That's about it at this point, other than to say sudgy seems like a potentially easy mislynch. I think I'm still voting for him from way back, so I should Unvote.
I'll try to re-read a couple of people before I go to bed.
This reads as scum!Jimmmmm trying to clear his name of the sudgy lynch. The reads seem honest enough though.
yuma should just vig TA to prove his claim, and then we no-lynch.
And by TA I mean Andrew.
Wants to get rid of Andrew. Reads to me like Jimmmmm wants to get rid of yuma's DayKill and eliminate a Towny. He says it will "validate yuma's claim"...but in my opinion that is unnecessary. yuma is in my mind pretty likely to be Town.
I guess it's time for me to claim? I'm a split jailkeeper.
A what?
Yeah what's a split jailkeeper?
Really scummy. On both Jimmmmm and ashersky's account.
Yeah that seems like a fairly believeable claim.
Have you thought about which option you're going to choose Tonight Andrew?
Why would he ask this?
Yeah that seems like a fairly believeable claim.
Have you thought about which option you're going to choose Tonight Andrew?
?? Why are you asking this....
I'm assuming Andrew is smart enough not to give anything away that he shouldn't, but I'd like to see evidence that he's actually thought about this role and it's not just something that was given him as a fakeclaim.
That explanation is so weak.
Sorry sudgy, too late. I think a lynch is better than no-lynch.
Vote: sudgy
Pretty towny reasoning, but scummy combined with the previous sudgy back-off. Equals out to null.
D2:I still think ash is Town.
I still don't understand how he could think that. I don't think he has explained yet?
I am also getting increasingly uneasy about yuma. I do not like the effort he put in last day to stop a lynch.
Any theories as to why scum yuma would claim Dayvig?
This is pretty scummy after he wanted yuma to prove his claim. If he thought yuma was town, why does he need to prove his shot?
You're still spreading suspicion.
What does that even mean? In a game centred around there being players who actively want to "kill" everyone else, you're suggesting that we not be suspicious of people?
Jimmmmm has a Towny perspective here.
I've been somewhat busy, but I'll be rereading Jimmmmm (to investigate scumminess) and Andrew (prove Townieness) soon.
You're re-reading with preconceived bias?
Eh. Null for this. His confusion would be expected as Town or Scum.
I'll wait...
I think we should lynch sudgy Today. He's probably scum. Oh wait, we did that already! Now we can make progress towards lynching actual scum instead of giving them a free kill and then doing what we would have done anyway.
Towny for Jimmmmm here. Stands by his "a lynch is better than a no lynch" which I think scum is likely to put the blame on someone.
First, Jimm is super active right before the lynch, and puts (or is just put in) a position where he essentially decides who the lynch candidate is. This is somewhat convenient, as if one of the lynch candidates were scum, he could decide the other one.
This is false. My preferred lynch between the two was Andrew, but I couldn't get that lynch through so I settled for the sudgy lynch ahead of no-lynch. I mean, you could say scum me would have let the no-lynch happen instead if the person in question was also scum, but I don't think that's particularly compelling.
I could see Jimm trying to dig a little deeper into roles to try to get some clues on who to target with night actions and who needs to be killed.
Is rolefishing actually a thing? It's something that people are accused of fairly regularly, but have we ever actually seen scum try to make a Townie accidentally say more about their role than they should? If someone who you are considering lynching claims, you can either accept it blindly, reject it blindly, or question them about it. Which of these do you think is best?
To answer is question: In Andrew's case, I accepted it blindly. Slight Town on him for his explanation.
First, Jimm is super active right before the lynch, and puts (or is just put in) a position where he essentially decides who the lynch candidate is. This is somewhat convenient, as if one of the lynch candidates were scum, he could decide the other one.
This is false. My preferred lynch between the two was Andrew, but I couldn't get that lynch through so I settled for the sudgy lynch ahead of no-lynch. I mean, you could say scum me would have let the no-lynch happen instead if the person in question was also scum, but I don't think that's particularly compelling.
Which part is false? You're saying that Andrew lynch could not have happened? When I was reading it looked like there was a point where both were viable. I thought someone even said that it's going to come down to whichever one Jimmm chooses.
It's false that I got to choose which lynch went through. Regardless of what you think someone said, I chose the Andrew lynch and the sudgy lynch went though.
Here I think that Jimmmmm is getting scummily defensive. He's the one who hammered sudgy and could've let it go to no lynch.
Then there is all that "What does the green text mean?" which is sort of weird. Not scummy-weird, just weird. So Null on all that stuff.
TA is town and telling the truth.
vote: jimmmmm to have a vacation vote and because I think his reaction to TA's reveal is off.
What do you mean by off?
Not sure what ashersky means here. Slight Town on Jimmmmm for missing TA's claim.