which is a point against him if it comes to it.
hey look a mail-mi! I would agree with you here...
I was also hoping to hear from chairs tonight. He had hoped that he would have some free time to post.
PS reminder: I am about to start up my on week at work, so no morning, afternoon or late night posting from me.
And I think I am going to
unvote. And actually vote for the person who the player I was just voting for is voting for
vote: teproc.
Ichimaru's
case has some points that are ok and some that aren't, but what struck me was how Teproc responded:
Interesting post by Ichimaru. I do hedge a lot, that's who I am, I'm never sure of anything. I know it's ont good for the game, and I do try to appear more certain than I am (for example, I am certain that pretty much every argument that has been done in the history of mafia can be reduced to WIFOM, because you're never sure scum isn't thinking three steps ahead of you), but I'm apparently failing at that.
That post was very convincing even though it was wrong. Could he have done that as scum ? Maybe. But I don't think so. Unvote
2.7, you have Robz's "nobody say anything about the setup !" moment listed in the scummy things he's done. I actually think it's a pretty townie thing to do, so I'm interested in your reasoning here.
It isn't the same as mail-mi's classic "this is a good case on me" when he was scum in whatever game that was, but it is a cousin of sorts as Teproc basically says that Ichimaru has some valid points. Add to it a subtle hint of buddying by unvoting and ultimately getting a read of town from it...