Ashersky - I do not see how voting yourself is pro-town. Please enlighten me.
It's not pro-town. It's anti-town. Yuma (and anyone else opposing my self-vote) is correct there.
Glad you cleared that up. I was pretty sure it was anti-town. My question: why the vote then? Are you town fed up with being suspected or are you scum resigning yourself to a certain fate? I know limiting you to two different possibilities is bold because you are known to do just about anything.
I, for one, thought you were town all of D1. I, for one, do not want to lynch anti-town behavior, I want to lynch scum. I am not entirely convinced you are scum. However, I will policy vote for you tomorrow after Lekkit and teproc have had a chance to post if you are still voting yourself.
PPE:2
I like your thinking, homes. As for two options for my own voting, those are two good ones.
But, I'd point out that you've all seen the "scum!ash resigned to losing because it's hopeless" ash before. Does this seem like that?
The honest answer is I'm just tired. Tired of being misread so many times. Part of it comes from having just been scum like 80 times in the last 79 games. So now, fair or not, I'm going to be suspected more than "normal" in current games, until I have a streak of town flips again. So maybe hastening the town flip isn't so bad for me personally, even if it isn't the greatest option for town.
The problem now, though, is if I unvote, it's scummy because "hey ash doesn't want to die he's scum!" is sure to be tossed out by someone. So it's a catch-22. Sure, it's partly my own doing, from 30-some games of creating my own meta. Still exists, though, and there's little to be done.
If you think I'm the scummiest, vote me. Lynch me. If you don't, then vote where you think the scum are.