The Case on mail-mi, or Why We Really Should Lynch Him D1 This Timeunvote for sure. Chairs is 99% town I am thinking.
vote: Voltaire too many town reads so early in the game.
Since when is this scummy/a reason to vote someone?
vote: Voltaire rage vote. I hate hate hate "secret cases" even if they're "secret town slips." Remember the last time someone did this ? Yeah, they were scum.
Since when does mail-mi rage vote?
Oh scum totally tries gutsy plans. All the time.
*squints* Really? D1? Really? Cite examples.
The one that you brought up: Ash&co. in RMM9 (Jimmmm's game) being all on or all off.
That's completely different from a plan to misunderstand the setup D1. That's what we're talking about. Early D1 individual plans.
Okay, I can't think of any specific examples. But i am not going to discredit scum being gutsy on D1. It is very possible.
Statement with no evidence.
He then does his sheeping, of not lynching chairs, of giving yuma a D1 pass, of plan-less ash, of the case on faust, of the case on lio.
He then has the post where he states I have a bias against him (admittedly true) and claims that town will lose if we lynch him, statistically. I'll let yuma take it from here:
and I think bringing up the metastat of mail-mi not being alive at the end of the game is scummy... I don't think these games offer a large enough sampling size nor a reliable enough set of variables to draw any conclusions from in this area... unless you are trying to manipulate people into thinking a certain set of conclusions...
After being called out, mail-mi claims he was only semi-serious! This is the second time he has done this, after claiming his first vote on me (way back at the top of this post) was semi-serious.
I would like everyone to re-read mail-mi.
I would like everyone (who has played with him before) to ask themselves, "is this how town!mail-mi acts?"
I would like everyone (especially Robz) to consider how we always let mail-mi live, and what that means.
Before I've read anything else
I would like everyone to remember Volt's bias against me. (this is serious)
I would like everyone to read this: YES.
I would like everyone to realize that if mail-mi isn't alive at the end of the game and is town, town loses. (yes this is also semi-serious. Stats say that if you mislynch me, you lose. Look at the games I'm in.)
I think I only bring up biases when I'm scum.
and I think bringing up the metastat of mail-mi not being alive at the end of the game is scummy... I don't think these games offer a large enough sampling size nor a reliable enough set of variables to draw any conclusions from in this area... unless you are trying to manipulate people into thinking a certain set of conclusions...
Bolded that for you.
Then he votes chairs anyway, despite his previous sheeping of the "chairs is probably a PR".
So, I think mail-mi is committing the scum tell of "oh crap, that thing I did was scummy - I was just kidding!" in addition to the fact that he has a general anti-town meta. This lets him live for a very long time, because players (like me in the past) keep saying "lynch mafia not scum" and he gets to skate by. mail-mi has also resorted to irrelevant-to-the-game defenses (like the stats).
The following players have voted mail-mi, stated a willingness to vote mail-mi, or have had him in their most recent lynch pool:
Voltaire, chairs, faust, Robz, (yuma?), e, (lio?)
That's seven, and I probably missed some people/some people would vote him to cause a lynch.
PPE: A lot posted while I was writing this.