Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 91  All

Author Topic: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs(Town wins!)  (Read 202196 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #850 on: December 18, 2013, 05:20:00 pm »

He's just going to let the day run out without returning to post anything.  That's what scum does.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

liopoil

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2587
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #851 on: December 18, 2013, 05:20:11 pm »

as it happens, I had the JK9++ wiki page open before it went down! should I put the relevant info in here?
Logged

2.71828.....

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1290
  • Shuffle iT Username: irrationalE
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #852 on: December 18, 2013, 05:21:35 pm »

Maybe he's waiting for mafiascum wiki to reload again so he can perfect his fake claim.

He already said something about the letter it would imply. What else could he say?

How many V combos include Vengeful as an option?
they are actually "K" combos according to the wiki, which is why he said K. I believe if we rolled 1 K it is 50/50 for vengeful/ vig.  Multiple K rolls force a vengeful
Logged
Man. I had four strips of bacon yesterday. Was one automatically undercooked, one automatically overcooked? No, let's put a stop to that right here, all four strips were excellent.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #853 on: December 18, 2013, 05:22:00 pm »

Faust? Where are you? You actually could possibly sort of acquit yourself if you show up and answer some questions...
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

2.71828.....

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1290
  • Shuffle iT Username: irrationalE
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #854 on: December 18, 2013, 05:22:13 pm »

as it happens, I had the JK9++ wiki page open before it went down! should I put the relevant info in here?
that would be great
Logged
Man. I had four strips of bacon yesterday. Was one automatically undercooked, one automatically overcooked? No, let's put a stop to that right here, all four strips were excellent.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #855 on: December 18, 2013, 05:22:18 pm »

as it happens, I had the JK9++ wiki page open before it went down! should I put the relevant info in here?

NO
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #856 on: December 18, 2013, 05:23:54 pm »

Not yet at least.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

liopoil

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2587
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #857 on: December 18, 2013, 05:24:04 pm »

okay :P

not sure exactly what your theory is, but sure.

what e said about rolling K is incorrect
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #858 on: December 18, 2013, 05:24:25 pm »

as it happens, I had the JK9++ wiki page open before it went down! should I put the relevant info in here?

NO

Yeah, if faust does NOT post before mafiascum comes back up, that's even MORE damning evidence against him.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #859 on: December 18, 2013, 05:24:49 pm »

Actually... I don't know if what I'm thinking about is legal... maybe that information is supposed to just be public at all times?
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

liopoil

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2587
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #860 on: December 18, 2013, 05:25:26 pm »

Actually... I don't know if what I'm thinking about is legal... maybe that information is supposed to just be public at all times?
yeah, probably. good question.

faust viewed the thread 3 minutes ago!
Logged

2.71828.....

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1290
  • Shuffle iT Username: irrationalE
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #861 on: December 18, 2013, 05:25:41 pm »

okay :P

not sure exactly what your theory is, but sure.

what e said about rolling K is incorrect

[joke] so that makes me an IC now, right?[/joke]
Logged
Man. I had four strips of bacon yesterday. Was one automatically undercooked, one automatically overcooked? No, let's put a stop to that right here, all four strips were excellent.

2.71828.....

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1290
  • Shuffle iT Username: irrationalE
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #862 on: December 18, 2013, 05:26:08 pm »

The joke tags are to avoid ambiguity.
Logged
Man. I had four strips of bacon yesterday. Was one automatically undercooked, one automatically overcooked? No, let's put a stop to that right here, all four strips were excellent.

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #863 on: December 18, 2013, 05:26:19 pm »

Actually... I don't know if what I'm thinking about is legal... maybe that information is supposed to just be public at all times?

JK9++ is semi-open.  That means all information about HOW the set-up was derived is publically known information (i.e., what all the possible rolls are).

The fact that the website isn't opening right now doesn't change that.  However, it does trap scum into making mistakes, which helps us.  If 2.7 was his scum partner trying to help with the fake claim, he might have just copy/pasted the info into the game.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

liopoil

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2587
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #864 on: December 18, 2013, 05:26:53 pm »

The joke tags are to avoid ambiguity.
was this post to avoid ambiguity too?
Logged

Voltaire

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 957
  • flavor text
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #865 on: December 18, 2013, 05:28:08 pm »

No referencing ongoing games, people!
Logged

liopoil

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2587
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #866 on: December 18, 2013, 05:28:48 pm »

robz, do you know how the setup works? just wondering if you do, not asking you to tell us (I know, I can look at the page right now!)
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #867 on: December 18, 2013, 05:28:55 pm »

Actually... I don't know if what I'm thinking about is legal... maybe that information is supposed to just be public at all times?

JK9++ is semi-open.  That means all information about HOW the set-up was derived is publically known information (i.e., what all the possible rolls are).

The fact that the website isn't opening right now doesn't change that.  However, it does trap scum into making mistakes, which helps us.  If 2.7 was his scum partner trying to help with the fake claim, he might have just copy/pasted the info into the game.

Right right right, but I feel a little dirty getting him this way, as it's looking clearer and clearer like that's exactly what's happening here.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Voltaire

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 957
  • flavor text
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #868 on: December 18, 2013, 05:30:10 pm »

Right right right, but I feel a little dirty getting him this way, as it's looking clearer and clearer like that's exactly what's happening here.

But why can't he explain why he claimed? That wouldn't involve him saying anything about the setup.
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #869 on: December 18, 2013, 05:30:33 pm »

robz, do you know how the setup works? just wondering if you do, not asking you to tell us (I know, I can look at the page right now!)

I've looked at it, but I couldn't tell you exactly what the letter categories are, and the power distributions in each category, since we're not at the stage where I need to constantly check the setup to verify claims.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #870 on: December 18, 2013, 05:32:01 pm »

Right right right, but I feel a little dirty getting him this way, as it's looking clearer and clearer like that's exactly what's happening here.

But why can't he explain why he claimed? That wouldn't involve him saying anything about the setup.

Well yeah he could and should, but he should also know some extra details about the V section, probably. Or at least if he DOES know those extra details, it's probably much more likely to be true, since he cant be using mafia scum wiki to help him right now.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

2.71828.....

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1290
  • Shuffle iT Username: irrationalE
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #871 on: December 18, 2013, 05:33:38 pm »

This is either disgusted town or caught scum behavior from Faust. I lean caught scum and am ready to vote: Faust

His flavor is all bad to. Town!e is shu. Town!ash is shu. Scum!Faust is wu.
Logged
Man. I had four strips of bacon yesterday. Was one automatically undercooked, one automatically overcooked? No, let's put a stop to that right here, all four strips were excellent.

2.71828.....

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1290
  • Shuffle iT Username: irrationalE
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #872 on: December 18, 2013, 05:35:07 pm »

This is either disgusted town or caught scum behavior from Faust. I lean caught scum and am ready to vote: Faust

His flavor is all bad to. Town!e is shu. Town!ash is shu. Scum!Faust is wu.
or, he is at least different than us. So we will likely get at least 1 scum for 1 town
Logged
Man. I had four strips of bacon yesterday. Was one automatically undercooked, one automatically overcooked? No, let's put a stop to that right here, all four strips were excellent.

liopoil

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2587
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs(2 spots left!)
« Reply #873 on: December 18, 2013, 05:36:05 pm »

This is either disgusted town or caught scum behavior from Faust. I lean caught scum and am ready to vote: Faust

His flavor is all bad to. Town!e is shu. Town!ash is shu. Scum!Faust is wu.
or, he is at least different than us. So we will likely get at least 1 scum for 1 town
Pm's are going out, and hopefully you learned from last time don't freak out when you get a colored Pm, The Battle of the Red Cliffs is the showdown between the massive Wei army(Bad Guys!), against the combined forces of the Wu naval fleet(Good Guys!) and some Shu officers(also good guys!)
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXVI: Dynasty Warriors Mafia 2 The Battle of Red Cliffs
« Reply #874 on: December 18, 2013, 05:37:14 pm »

Yeah both Wu and Shu are the good guys in the Battle of Red Cliffs. They are allies at this point.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 91  All
 

Page created in 0.088 seconds with 20 queries.