Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24] 25 26 ... 42  All

Author Topic: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia  (Read 95586 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

yuma

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 695
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #575 on: October 17, 2013, 01:49:12 pm »

Unvote

So, I believe sudgy, I guess. Who came aboard? Voltaire. Who I had mega suspicion of much earlier.

Vote: Voltaire

I hate these sort of "gambits"... the never work. This coming from me, who tried one in MIX on sparky... I voted for him to see who would join, turns out only town joined because it was a damn good case on scum! But no... I was convinced it was the people joining the wagon who were scum...

These sort of things don't work and I think robz should know better than to try and use them...
Logged

yuma

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 695
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #576 on: October 17, 2013, 01:49:52 pm »

Unvote

So, I believe sudgy, I guess. Who came aboard? Voltaire. Who I had mega suspicion of much earlier.

Vote: Voltaire

Wait, what? Sudgy made one post since you last posted. What part of it changed your mind?

Or is it the fact that I voted for sudgy? I'd announced "intent to vote" on him ages ago, prior to the whole modkill brouhaha.

No, I kind of believed sudgy the whole time. Wanted to see who would vote for him, though. And intent to votes are scummy.

LAME!!!
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #577 on: October 17, 2013, 01:50:05 pm »

You put an emoticon in your vote explanation post.

Have you ever gone back and figured out if that is true, post-games?

It's impossible for me to get a handle on this game because there are so many players who appear to be playing intentionally anti-town that I can't have reads on anybody. (intentional hyperbole referencing frustration with ash, Robz, sudgy as I doubt those three are the scum team)

Eevee in Mafia 3!

Speaking of which , where is the Pokemon?
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Voltaire

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 957
  • flavor text
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #578 on: October 17, 2013, 01:52:53 pm »

Eevee in Mafia 3!

Speaking of which , where is the Pokemon?

And Eevee has been town who used emoticons in how many games?

You used a dumb gambit to confirmation-bias yourself into voting for me. Voltaire is  >:(.
Logged

Voltaire

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 957
  • flavor text
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #579 on: October 17, 2013, 01:53:57 pm »

Completely ok with a chairs lynch if all the sudgy and ash voters claim they're all lying. Would rather still lynch sudgy or ash.
Logged

nkirbit

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 238
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #580 on: October 17, 2013, 02:22:37 pm »

No, I kind of believed sudgy the whole time. Wanted to see who would vote for him, though. And intent to votes are scummy.

You know what makes this game impossible? When town lies.

Why me instead of Twistedarcher, yuma, chairs?

So you're saying that you know robz is town?
Logged

yuma

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 695
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #581 on: October 17, 2013, 02:32:07 pm »

No, I kind of believed sudgy the whole time. Wanted to see who would vote for him, though. And intent to votes are scummy.

You know what makes this game impossible? When town lies.

Why me instead of Twistedarcher, yuma, chairs?

So you're saying that you know robz is town?

that is obviously not what he is saying...

town can refer to both the alignment "town" as well as town, as in everyone playing in this "town"... all 13 players

as in "jeez... this town is being crazy today"
Logged

Twistedarcher

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 494
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #582 on: October 17, 2013, 03:12:58 pm »

No, I kind of believed sudgy the whole time. Wanted to see who would vote for him, though. And intent to votes are scummy.

You know what makes this game impossible? When town lies.

Why me instead of Twistedarcher, yuma, chairs?

So you're saying that you know robz is town?

I had this exact same reaction. And it's the second time he's done this today.
Logged

yuma

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 695
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #583 on: October 17, 2013, 03:23:36 pm »

No, I kind of believed sudgy the whole time. Wanted to see who would vote for him, though. And intent to votes are scummy.

You know what makes this game impossible? When town lies.

Why me instead of Twistedarcher, yuma, chairs?

So you're saying that you know robz is town?

I had this exact same reaction. And it's the second time he's done this today.

what is he supposed to say?

"You know what makes this game impossible? When someone of unknown alignment that could potentially be either town or scum (I don't know which they are because I am town and have no knowledge of anyone else's alignment) lie?"

Yeah... that just rolls off the fingertips...
Logged

Voltaire

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 957
  • flavor text
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #584 on: October 17, 2013, 03:43:15 pm »

wut yuma said
Logged

Voltaire

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 957
  • flavor text
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #585 on: October 17, 2013, 03:45:57 pm »

Also, I was insanely tempted to vote Robz, because I think his play recently has been anti-town, but I held myself back because anti-town != scum, and Robz plays this way regularly. Which is frustrating, so I went with expressing the frustration instead. Unfortunately the entire thing is a nulltell on Robz, which is said. I would prefer to have solidified a townread on him, or something.
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #586 on: October 17, 2013, 04:06:23 pm »

Voltaire was caught red-handed piling on sudgy, who I expected to be a mislynch. And he should have expected it too. In fact he did, he sort of even noted it and then just went ahead. Very scummy.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

chairs

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 134
  • Why don't you have a seat over there...
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #587 on: October 17, 2013, 04:07:58 pm »

Also, I was insanely tempted to vote Robz, because I think his play recently has been anti-town, but I held myself back because anti-town != scum, and Robz plays this way regularly. Which is frustrating, so I went with expressing the frustration instead. Unfortunately the entire thing is a nulltell on Robz, which is said. I would prefer to have solidified a townread on him, or something.

I can empathize with this.  I've repeatedly felt like there's so much anti-town play happening in these frustratration-inspired posts that I'm almost at self-voting levels of annoyed.  I'm not willing to give up on Town winning this on D1, but I think we're doing our best to try not to win, I think.

yuma

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 695
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #588 on: October 17, 2013, 04:08:34 pm »

Voltaire was caught red-handed piling on sudgy, who I expected to be a mislynch. And he should have expected it too. In fact he did, he sort of even noted it and then just went ahead. Very scummy.

why is sudgy a mislynch... Your whole hypothesis rests on sudgy being a mislynch. This has not been proven.

this logic is just as faulty as me hypothesizing that theorel is scum because he could fit the role as sudgy's partner. Both rely on information we don't have....
Logged

Voltaire

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 957
  • flavor text
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #589 on: October 17, 2013, 04:12:43 pm »

Voltaire was caught red-handed piling on sudgy, who I expected to be a mislynch. And he should have expected it too. In fact he did, he sort of even noted it and then just went ahead. Very scummy.

Other than me, who would you want to lynch? What do you think about ash at this point?
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #590 on: October 17, 2013, 04:14:08 pm »

Voltaire was caught red-handed piling on sudgy, who I expected to be a mislynch. And he should have expected it too. In fact he did, he sort of even noted it and then just went ahead. Very scummy.

why is sudgy a mislynch... Your whole hypothesis rests on sudgy being a mislynch. This has not been proven.

this logic is just as faulty as me hypothesizing that theorel is scum because he could fit the role as sudgy's partner. Both rely on information we don't have....

I buy that sudgy is town.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #591 on: October 17, 2013, 04:15:40 pm »

Voltaire was caught red-handed piling on sudgy, who I expected to be a mislynch. And he should have expected it too. In fact he did, he sort of even noted it and then just went ahead. Very scummy.

Other than me, who would you want to lynch? What do you think about ash at this point?

Ash is narrowly more likely scum than town, I think, but I don't want to lynch him.

I'd lynch lurker!Eevee.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

sudgy

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3431
  • Shuffle iT Username: sudgy
  • It's pronounced "SOO-jee"
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #592 on: October 17, 2013, 04:15:46 pm »

Chairs, why are you still voting me when what you quoted was not a contradiction?
Logged
If you're wondering what my avatar is, watch this.

Check out my logic puzzle blog!

   Quote from: sudgy on June 31, 2011, 11:47:46 pm

Voltaire

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 957
  • flavor text
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #593 on: October 17, 2013, 04:17:07 pm »

Ash is narrowly more likely scum than town, I think, but I don't want to lynch him.

And when/what made that change? Particularly the "don't want to lynch him" part.
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #594 on: October 17, 2013, 04:19:28 pm »

Ash is narrowly more likely scum than town, I think, but I don't want to lynch him.

And when/what made that change? Particularly the "don't want to lynch him" part.

Well, he's a claimed PR, right? So there are bigger consequences to mislynching him, and we're going to be more confident on him tomorrow. Thus the "don't want to lynch him," part.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

yuma

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 695
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #595 on: October 17, 2013, 04:20:48 pm »

Voltaire was caught red-handed piling on sudgy, who I expected to be a mislynch. And he should have expected it too. In fact he did, he sort of even noted it and then just went ahead. Very scummy.

why is sudgy a mislynch... Your whole hypothesis rests on sudgy being a mislynch. This has not been proven.

this logic is just as faulty as me hypothesizing that theorel is scum because he could fit the role as sudgy's partner. Both rely on information we don't have....

I buy that sudgy is town.

Why
Logged

Voltaire

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 957
  • flavor text
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #596 on: October 17, 2013, 04:22:45 pm »

Well, he's a claimed PR, right? So there are bigger consequences to mislynching him, and we're going to be more confident on him tomorrow. Thus the "don't want to lynch him," part.

But you were voting for him for a very long time after he claimed 1-shot doc. It's ok if your thinking changed, but like yuma just said, why did it change?
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #597 on: October 17, 2013, 04:22:51 pm »

Voltaire was caught red-handed piling on sudgy, who I expected to be a mislynch. And he should have expected it too. In fact he did, he sort of even noted it and then just went ahead. Very scummy.

why is sudgy a mislynch... Your whole hypothesis rests on sudgy being a mislynch. This has not been proven.

this logic is just as faulty as me hypothesizing that theorel is scum because he could fit the role as sudgy's partner. Both rely on information we don't have....

I buy that sudgy is town.

Why

My reading of his actions.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

yuma

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 695
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #598 on: October 17, 2013, 04:23:31 pm »

Voltaire was caught red-handed piling on sudgy, who I expected to be a mislynch. And he should have expected it too. In fact he did, he sort of even noted it and then just went ahead. Very scummy.

why is sudgy a mislynch... Your whole hypothesis rests on sudgy being a mislynch. This has not been proven.

this logic is just as faulty as me hypothesizing that theorel is scum because he could fit the role as sudgy's partner. Both rely on information we don't have....

I buy that sudgy is town.

Why

My reading of his actions.

oh, thanks... that explains everything... vote: robz
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XXXII: Dynasty Warriors Mafia
« Reply #599 on: October 17, 2013, 04:23:56 pm »

Well, he's a claimed PR, right? So there are bigger consequences to mislynching him, and we're going to be more confident on him tomorrow. Thus the "don't want to lynch him," part.

But you were voting for him for a very long time after he claimed 1-shot doc. It's ok if your thinking changed, but like yuma just said, why did it change?

Which of the two posts where I explained my position re:ashersky would you like me to re quote for you?
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24] 25 26 ... 42  All
 

Page created in 2.324 seconds with 20 queries.