theorel because you never discussed the implications that a vig not shooting on night1 can have on our impact of figuring out if there is a sk. regardless of whether you think in general shooting on night1 is good or not (I personally am somewhere in the middle most of the time on this, but because I play a little more conservatively lean toward don't shoot) I think if you can see the information that can be gained you would see not shooting--only on night1--would be worth it.
If you think not shooting on night1 is good, then obviously it is worth it.
If you think shooting on night1 is good, then I still think it is worth it. Because what are we trading. A potential kill of an unknown alignment that has the ability to kill mafia/town/PR compared to gaining valuable information about the setup, specifically regarding the serial killer which can then translate into information regarding what sort of a scum team we are up against, we can then translate into limited amount of fake claims that mafia can make.
Basically I feel like the people who have answered negative to this idea have basically said: "I already decided beforehand that shooting on night1 is good, therefore it is good, because I decided beforehand." and haven't really looked at the implications behind what I am trying to suggest.
But again, as I said before, this only works if 100% of the people do it. Obviously we don't have 100%. So this whole point is moot and I am only talking about it because you specifically asked why I thought you might commit to not shooting. I think this conversation needs to be over otherwise.