Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[EFHW]

mail-mi said his name wasn't on the list of characters.  Is that true?

I checked, not there.

[EFHW]

I have had a thought that contradicts Galz and Robz's assumptions, but not sure if/how to share it.  I don't even know if I have the right post in mind!

Let's hold off for now.

I would like to wait for mail-mi to get to a computer and give his reads.

If I have the right post in mind, then we do we want him to post anything more?

Mrrrg.  I know, I know, I am grappling with this too.

also suggests innocence.

[Voltgloss]

I have had a thought that contradicts Galz and Robz's assumptions, but not sure if/how to share it.  I don't even know if I have the right post in mind!

Let's hold off for now.

I would like to wait for mail-mi to get to a computer and give his reads.

If I have the right post in mind, then we do we want him to post anything more?

Mrrrg.  I know, I know, I am grappling with this too.

also suggests innocence.

Of being Role Cop.  Not necessarily of being scum.

[EFHW]

There's no real case without the rolecop accusation.

[Voltgloss]

There's no real case without the rolecop accusation.

Well, I don't agree with you there. 

[Voltgloss]

Galz, you are on.  How do you want to proceed?

[Galzria]

I have had a thought that contradicts Galz and Robz's assumptions, but not sure if/how to share it.  I don't even know if I have the right post in mind!

Let's hold off for now.

I would like to wait for mail-mi to get to a computer and give his reads.

If I have the right post in mind, then we do we want him to post anything more?

Mrrrg.  I know, I know, I am grappling with this too.

also suggests innocence.

Of being Role Cop.  Not necessarily of being scum.

This would be technically true, yes. The suspicion is that he's a Rolecop. Now, if he IS, he's scum because he claimed that he wasn't (circular logic ftw!), but the original post only indicated Role, not alignment. I made assumptions based on that Role, and his general overall play.

[Galzria]

Galz, you are on.  How do you want to proceed?

I'm teaching again in 8 minutes, but I'm not sure. I've written a suggestion post to Robz, but I don't know how much he wants to say given, well...

[Eevee]

This thread has taken a quite confusing turn.

[Galzria]

Posting without waiting for a reply from Robz.

Voltgloss, this should clue you in to if we're on the same page or not, and for those looking for more, it's the best I can offer at this time. If Volt or Robz wish to expand, it's on them. I'll be working:

The 'slip' in question is one that demonstrates a certain knowledge on Mail-Mi's part. A knowledge that I don't honestly believe that he would, in the moment, just happen to know.

Further, he makes an assumption based on 1 piece of information that is, in my mind, an unreasonable assumption unless you happen to have prior knowledge of the situation. That is, piece of Information A should not be enough alone to figure out piece of information B, and yet it's a leap that he made without hesitancy.

That's as much as I can say in explaining the 'slip'. I can't tell you exactly what it was, because if he's in fact exactly what I believe then I would be providing his scummates with the very information I'm trying to prevent them from having. It may well be too late regardless, but this was the best way we (Robz and I) could think to present this given what we (believe) saw.

[Voltaire]

Knowing exciting stuff would be happening, I've checked in. I do have to leave soon-ish. Don't want to say what I'm thinking until Galz/Robz explain what they were thinking.

A REMINDER TO ANYONE WHO ISN'T CAUGHT UP: MAIL-MI IS AT L-1. DO NOT VOTE

[Voltgloss]

Galz, a question for you:  Have you read LOTR 2?  Are you familiar with that game?  This is relevant.

[Voltaire]

That's as much as I can say in explaining the 'slip'. I can't tell you exactly what it was, because if he's in fact exactly what I believe then I would be providing his scummates with the very information I'm trying to prevent them from having. It may well be too late regardless, but this was the best way we (Robz and I) could think to present this given what we (believe) saw.

This is exactly what I was thinking. I am ok with it not getting explained, pending Voltgloss not being on the same page.

[Voltgloss]

Galz, a question for you:  Have you read LOTR 2?  Are you familiar with that game?  This is relevant.

Duh of course you co-modded it

[Voltgloss]

The 'slip' in question is one that demonstrates a certain knowledge on Mail-Mi's part. A knowledge that I don't honestly believe that he would, in the moment, just happen to know.

Galz, think back to LOTR 2.  Remember that mail-mi was my scumpartner in that game. 

The more I think about it, the more I think LOTR 2 is a reason why mail-mi would "just happen to know" the knowledge at issue - WITHOUT it bearing on mail-mi's role in this game, or alignment.

I am sure you and I are talking about the same thing.

[Voltaire]

That's as much as I can say in explaining the 'slip'. I can't tell you exactly what it was, because if he's in fact exactly what I believe then I would be providing his scummates with the very information I'm trying to prevent them from having. It may well be too late regardless, but this was the best way we (Robz and I) could think to present this given what we (believe) saw.

This is exactly what I was thinking. I am ok with it not getting explained, pending Voltgloss not being on the same page.

Actually...if it's what I think it is, there would be no downside at all about talking about it. So I can say with confidence I do not know what this is.

[Voltgloss]

I still want mail-mi's reads though.

[Voltgloss]

And I do not want the L-1 situation to change yet.

[EFHW]

That's as much as I can say in explaining the 'slip'. I can't tell you exactly what it was, because if he's in fact exactly what I believe then I would be providing his scummates with the very information I'm trying to prevent them from having. It may well be too late regardless, but this was the best way we (Robz and I) could think to present this given what we (believe) saw.

This is exactly what I was thinking. I am ok with it not getting explained, pending Voltgloss not being on the same page.

Actually...if it's what I think it is, there would be no downside at all about talking about it. So I can say with confidence I do not know what this is.

It's nice to be able to say something with confidence!

[Robz888]

I think mail-mi should be lynched before he can get another word in.* Will be back with more thoughts later.

*Galz, check our QT.

[Voltaire]

I think mail-mi should be lynched before he can get another word in.* Will be back with more thoughts later.

*Galz, check our QT.

I do like that Voltgloss gets to hold the hammer here.

[Voltgloss]

Robz, are you familiar with LOTR 2?

[Voltgloss]

I think mail-mi should be lynched before he can get another word in.* Will be back with more thoughts later.

*Galz, check our QT.

I do like that Voltgloss gets to hold the hammer here.

Yes, and I will have no qualms with dropping it if I conclude I should.

[mail-mi]

I think mail-mi should be lynched before he can get another word in.* Will be back with more thoughts later.

*Galz, check our QT.

No, I shouldn't. My sister is almost done with her homework on the computer.

[Robz888]

Robz, are you familiar with LOTR 2?

Nope, not remotely. Just played ROT1.