My take on this sequence of posts is that Eevee is maneuvering himself into a position in which he can agree with Ashersky and vote me. For context, I’ll include some of the conversation between myself and Ashersky. If he thinks I’ve edited excessively, I can do more. As it is I apologize for the length. I prefer briefer posts.
Ashersky, so far your evidence against me is a "slip" no one else sees as a slip, a misunderstanding re: no lynch you yourself have acknowledged, misattributing to me something raerae said, and my willingness to give xeiron a chance to try his plan tonight (I don't agree with Day 2 no lynch). Am I missing something?
Before Ash answers, Eevee says Ash’s case makes him suspect Ash more than me.
I don't think EHFW couldn't be scum. But pretty much same can be said for ash, and his certainty is worrisome..
Ashersky replies to me with the elements of his case. I won’t comment on his case here.
I think the slip was a slip, even if others don't. I think you've misrepresented things multiple times. I think you've shown you have more set up info than the rest of us. I think your reaction to Xeiron's claim/plan was scummy.
I do think your stance on no lynch is bad and your willingness to go along with X is bad.
I acknowledged that it was possible your no lynch comment, which I saw as contradictory, could have referenced something else. That could have been your excuse to cover for it, too. It isn't conclusive evidence, though.
The raerae scummy statement attributed to you I will own up to. I think it was a scummy misrepresentation of TA's statement; raerae stands behind it. That's fine. I found it scummy.
Here Eevee says he has a reputation of opposing Day 1 lynches. I’m taking him to mean that he is cautious, but he can correct me if I’m wrong. He says he is uncomfortable with both me and Ash and knows I could be like I am being as scum.
Double negatives, how do they work.
Well, I have bit of a reputation to be against day 1 lynches. I like to think I've been correct with a good record too. In this game, I take that stance against the xeiron lynch - I will actively try to make it not happen.
I don't feel that way about EHFW. Ashersky is pushing it with too much certainty and it worries me, but EHFW answers are not convincing to me. I always try to think "could he be like that under pressure as scum", and I think EHFW could be.
Ash argues his own towniness
Compare how I'm pushing the EFHW case compared to how I pushed cases as scum. If I am scum forcing an EFHW mislynch, I'm being pretty stupid about it. What do I gain as scum from it? Why EFHW over anyone else?
Am I sure she's scum? As close to sure as you get on D1. Best case I've seen all day.
Eevee says he isn’t convinced but says he’s agreeing about me anyway.
Well, it's a pretty clever scum play if you think you can explain it as obvtown play, isn't it? You did a lot of things in mean girls I'd never expect scum to do.
But, as I said, I'm leaning towards agreeing with you, partially for the reason you stated.
Next post, he votes because he wants to get the day over with. Does this sound like cautious Eevee?
In fact, in the interest of not dragging this day out longer than necessary and generally lynching over not lynching, I will Vote: EHFW. Fwiw I'm surprised no one seems to be noticing ahoppy at all.
Later he answers my question about which of Ash’s reasons he agrees with. He cites Ash’s argument about his own towniness. In the earlier post he was voting me despite his doubts about Ash. Now his trust in ash is why he is voting. He doesn’t state a position on any part of ashersky’s case against me.
It's not exactly the scum play I'd expect the most - picking a super aggressive townie who is better than average at defending herself and just relentlessly tunneling her when the alternative is a long, dragged out day 1 that isn't leading us any closer to a lynch.
It's like, ash said he thinks this day is getting too long, and now he is acting on it. The overcertainty makes sense for town ash.
Author
Topic: RMM8 Innovation Inc. (Plagiarists Win!) (Read 195095 times)