Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All

Author Topic: Education  (Read 15967 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ratsia

  • Moneylender
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 168
  • Respect: +113
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #50 on: February 13, 2013, 08:51:26 am »
0

Note that Finland, unlike the US, has a split secondary education.  About half of students in Finland don't go to what the US would call "high school," instead going to a vocational school.
Good point, I did not think of that since I did not know that US does not have such a split. Also, Polk5440's point on not treating US as a big chunk is very valid one, though his post also indicated some alarmingly high degree of variance across different states or populations.

Quote
Of those in Finland that do go to what we'd call high school, apparently about 20% take the harder math curriculum--I'm grabbing this number from WP, which links to a source that is, alas, in Finnish, so I can't read it.  If you can, I'll link it.
Please do give the link -- I was actually looking for the percentage when writing my reply, but could not find a reliable source so chose to go with my subjective personal memories that are a bit dated and probably also biased because of the high school I went to back in the nineties. If the percentage indeed is as low as 20%, then we are indeed looking at only 10% of the total population studying integral calculus.

Quote
The Finns also have a government that cares about education at the national level.
Certainly. Besides focusing on elementary education, they also offer completely free university education (and in fact, pay notable monthly allowance for all bachelor and master's students).
« Last Edit: February 13, 2013, 08:53:28 am by Ratsia »
Logged

dondon151

  • 2012 US Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2522
  • Respect: +1856
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #51 on: February 13, 2013, 09:29:31 pm »
0

The difference is that for some reason people think that teachers, I don't know, just go by instinct?  As opposed to being trained, like we actually are.

I'm pretty sure the point is that teachers are still people, and people make subjective decisions (even if they are well trained not to).
Logged

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9415
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #52 on: February 13, 2013, 11:55:35 pm »
0

The difference is that for some reason people think that teachers, I don't know, just go by instinct?  As opposed to being trained, like we actually are.

I'm pretty sure the point is that teachers are still people, and people make subjective decisions (even if they are well trained not to).

So do judges, lawyers, doctors, nurses, engineers, and architects.  But I'm not talking about subjective decisions; I'm talking about non-educators who believe they know all about teaching because they went to school.  Rarely do those other professions have to deal with non-professionals telling them how their profession works.  We all deal with people telling us how our profession ought to work, but people who say "I think doctors should treat cancer with honey" are treated as nutjobs, while people who say "You can't objectively grade a free response question" are given serious consideration.  Which is why we end up forced to make students prepare for a standardized multiple-choice exam as opposed to teaching them how to think.
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

theory

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3603
  • Respect: +6125
    • View Profile
    • Dominion Strategy
Re: Education
« Reply #53 on: February 14, 2013, 12:06:59 am »
0

The difference is that for some reason people think that teachers, I don't know, just go by instinct?  As opposed to being trained, like we actually are.

I'm pretty sure the point is that teachers are still people, and people make subjective decisions (even if they are well trained not to).

So do judges, lawyers, doctors, nurses, engineers, and architects.  But I'm not talking about subjective decisions; I'm talking about non-educators who believe they know all about teaching because they went to school.  Rarely do those other professions have to deal with non-professionals telling them how their profession works.  We all deal with people telling us how our profession ought to work, but people who say "I think doctors should treat cancer with honey" are treated as nutjobs, while people who say "You can't objectively grade a free response question" are given serious consideration.  Which is why we end up forced to make students prepare for a standardized multiple-choice exam as opposed to teaching them how to think.

You're being overly dramatic.  My wife has a master's in education and is my go-to source.  I freely admit you have more personal experience than I, but the original point was that you could make standardized tests out of free response questions, which is still baffling to me.  They exist in some standardized tests (SAT II Writing, AP History) but are notoriously subjectively graded.

The dichotomy between "forced to prepare for a standardized multiple choice exam" and "teaching them how to think" is overstated in this country.  They don't align perfectly, but neither does literally any other form of evaluation.  Is it a coincidence that SAT scores correlate strongly with college GPA (as strongly as HSGPA)?  What would you replace it with?
Logged

dondon151

  • 2012 US Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2522
  • Respect: +1856
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #54 on: February 14, 2013, 12:10:35 am »
0

So do judges, lawyers, doctors, nurses, engineers, and architects.  But I'm not talking about subjective decisions; I'm talking about non-educators who believe they know all about teaching because they went to school.

No, you were talking about what theory was talking about, and I was talking about what theory was talking about. If you weren't, that is a non sequitur.

Man, that sentence was hard to write.
Logged

Ratsia

  • Moneylender
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 168
  • Respect: +113
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #55 on: February 14, 2013, 03:28:17 am »
0

the original point was that you could make standardized tests out of free response questions, which is still baffling to me.  They exist in some standardized tests (SAT II Writing, AP History) but are notoriously subjectively graded.
I'll again drop in with some examples from abroad. In Finland we have no standardized tests with multiple choice questions, but we do have ones with free response questions, though only at the very end of the high school;  here's a randomly googled US-centric rough overview of our system.

The matriculation exam has one test for each subject (though you only need to do some subset of those), and the tests are purely free response with the exception of some parts of the language tests. For maths, physics, history, biology etc you simply have a set of 10-13 free response questions, out of which you have to answer 6-8, depending on the subject. For languages you even have essays of 4-5 handwritten pages, graded between 0-60. The questions are fairly complex; even though you only answer 6-8 questions the exam lasts for 6 hours.

Some effort indeed goes to the grading. The tests are graded by the local teachers based on guidelines given by a nation-level board, but after that the exams are sent to the same board that re-checks all of the exams. They can change the grades and they also do so, though not terribly often (maybe a few percent of the grades change notably). For the essays there can be even extreme swings, from the highest grade to fail or vise versa in case of controversial cases. Finally, you can file in a formal complaint for the final grade, though my understanding is that this does not happen often.

As you can imagine, the system is somewhat heavy and expensive and there have always been discussions on major re-design or even getting rid of the matriculation exams, but nevertheless the system has stayed fairly intact for decades; the exams and grading for my parents in mid sixties were virtually identical to the tests used still a few years ago. Also, the results are generally considered reliable, to the extent that almost all universities use the results of those exams as part of their entrance exams and some even grant entrance solely based on the exam results.
Logged

eHalcyon

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8689
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #56 on: February 14, 2013, 11:07:15 am »
0

The International Bacalaureate (IB) program might also be worth noting. It does not rely on mc and includes short answer, long answer and even essay questions for evaluating students (for English and Social Studies, multiple essays!).
Logged

qmech

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1918
  • Shuffle iT Username: qmech
  • What year is it?
  • Respect: +2320
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #57 on: February 14, 2013, 03:01:18 pm »
0

Students in the UK generally take GCSEs (at 16) and A Levels (at 18).  I had to check that the term didn't mean something that couldn't be guessed from the two words, but it seems like these should count as standardised tests.  Out of exams for about 15 different qualifications, perhaps one included any element of multiple choice.  We certainly don't have anything like the US SATs, taken by everyone in the country and giving you a percentile rank.

I'd be interested in a summary of the US school system from anyone who's been through it.  When do you move schools?  When do you take various qualifications, and who awards them?  What do you get taught each year?  It seems to differ in lots of subtle ways from anything I'm familiar with, and I don't understand it as well as I'd like to, despite numerous attempts to figure it out.
Logged

Drab Emordnilap

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1832
  • Shuffle iT Username: Drab Emordnilap
  • Luther Bell Hendricks V
  • Respect: +1887
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #58 on: February 14, 2013, 03:42:28 pm »
+1

I'd be interested in a summary of the US school system from anyone who's been through it.  When do you move schools?  When do you take various qualifications, and who awards them?  What do you get taught each year?  It seems to differ in lots of subtle ways from anything I'm familiar with, and I don't understand it as well as I'd like to, despite numerous attempts to figure it out.

Super basic overview, from someone who graduated public High School in 2006:

12 grades, from age 6-7 to age 17-18. Also Kindergarten before first grade, sometimes. Also Pre-School before Kindergarten, but that's not really a part of the school system so much as it is day-care with learning.

Elementary School is K-5, Middle School is 6-8, High School is 9-12.

Elementary school, you have one teacher for 20-30 kids, who teaches major subjects -- math, language, "social studies" (history and geography), science. Ancilliary classes are taught by specialists throughout the day (your class has Music at 1pm on Wednesday and Friday, mine has Music on Monday and Tuesday at 10am) by specialist teachers. Your class walks together to the classroom for the specialized subject. Standardized tests are determined primarily at the state level and vary greatly from state to state. Generally speaking, you might have one test at the end of the year that covers all major subjects they expect you should understand for that year, but this test would not determine whether you continue to the next grade.

Middle School, all teachers are specialized, and students move from classroom to classroom throughout the day with autonomy. Lockers. School sports teams, after-school activities and clubs. Testing is

Logged

eHalcyon

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8689
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #59 on: February 14, 2013, 03:54:51 pm »
+1

Where I am in Canada, elementary is K-6, middle school is "Jr. High" and is 7-9, and Sr. High is 10-12.  I believe some places in Canada have the 6-8 middle school split described by Drab, and some places in the US are like here with the 7-9 middle school.

Elementary here is the same as described by Drab.  I remember doing English (basic reading and writing), math, social, some science.  There was a music class.  We also had gym and art, and very briefly some computers.

In Jr. High we actually got Options!  I ended up taking French (in which I am terrible) and computers.

In Sr. High there were also Options, but I had less of them because I was in a full IB program.  Notable about our Sr. High program is that you can now take Bio, Chem and Physics separately.  There is still a unified Science course though, for those who prefer that for whatever reason.

Provincial testing is done at grades 3, 6, 9 and 12.  And we did have some essay writing in grade 12... and I think 9 too?  Maybe even creative writing, it's hard to remember.
Logged

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9415
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #60 on: February 14, 2013, 03:55:20 pm »
+1

Students in the UK generally take GCSEs (at 16) and A Levels (at 18).  I had to check that the term didn't mean something that couldn't be guessed from the two words, but it seems like these should count as standardised tests.  Out of exams for about 15 different qualifications, perhaps one included any element of multiple choice.  We certainly don't have anything like the US SATs, taken by everyone in the country and giving you a percentile rank.

I'd be interested in a summary of the US school system from anyone who's been through it.  When do you move schools?  When do you take various qualifications, and who awards them?  What do you get taught each year?  It seems to differ in lots of subtle ways from anything I'm familiar with, and I don't understand it as well as I'd like to, despite numerous attempts to figure it out.

In most areas of the US, you essentially have the following progression:

Preschool (3-5)
Elementary School (5-12, labeled grades K-6)
Middle School or Junior High School (12-15 depending on school, grades 7-8 or 6-9)
High School (14-18, usually grades 9-12)

Graduation from High School is a prerequisite for college.  Schooling through 16 years or 12th grade, whichever comes first, is compulsory, though most will stay in school until age 18.

In Ohio, standardized tests are given in grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10.  About 80% of the questions are multiple choice.  However, the 3-8 tests are meaningless to the students themselves; they won't be held back if they fail the tests.  The school may lose its funding, though, or be forced into various interventions, if too few students pass.

Note the first problem here:  the school can lose funding for failing students, but they don't get the chance to remediate the students.  In fact, the junior high school they go to in 7th grade still must accept a student who has failed the 3rd through 6th grade tests.  In addition, the test results are not based on "did this student do better this year than last year," but "did the student do everything this year that s/he was supposed to."

The 10th grade tests are high-stakes tests; students must pass them all in order to graduate.  They first take them the second half of their 10th grade year; any that they don't pass get retaken in the first half of 11th grade, then again every following semester.  If they've failed more than one, they generally get put into a special remedial class whose only purpose is to get them to pass the test, and they'll take this class until they pass every test.  If they did poorly on their 8th grade tests, they'll often be put into this class in 10th grade automatically.  That means this classroom is composed of 10th through 12th graders, some of whom are in it for 3 years in a row... and after late March, when the tests are given, the class is useless, and therefore becomes chaotic.

All of this testing varies from state to state, as if the US were composed of fifty different small countries; nonetheless, the basic mandate comes from the federal government.

In addition, actual funding for the schools comes mainly from property taxes at the local level.  Only about 5% comes from federal money and 30-50% from the state.  However, the local money is not distributed among different localities to equalize things.  The property taxes are based on home values, which means neighboring districts can have vastly different budgets per pupil.  Rural districts often far the worst.

In addition, the amount of property tax given to the schools is determined by the voters in most localities.  Even a $10 a year hike in property taxes must be approved by 50% of voters.  Shockingly, it's easier to get such tax levies passed in more affluent communities, where it's more affordable.  In the less affluent communities, it's not uncommon for there to be bake sales and the like to get money to pay for advertising to convince voters.  This means that budgets can vary significantly from one year to the next, meaning teaching jobs and therefore class sizes fluctuate.

Now, back to what gets taught.  In Ohio, to graduate, a high school student must pass 4 years of English, 3 years of math, science, and social studies, a year of phys ed, and various amounts of other things.  Especially for English and math, this means a lot of students end up in summer school--one reason the US will likely never go to year-round schooling.  There is no foreign language requirement in Ohio, though there used to be.  Again, all of this varies from state to state, and individual districts can require more.

From elementary to junior high school, curricula are pretty regimented (with different standards by state).  Palindrome mentions class sizes; 25-35 per teacher is really closer for elementary school, with 20 being very low.  Classes in high schools are about the same size, depending on subject.  A high school teacher might teach six classes a day, and have 150 or more total students.  (Why are so many high school students given mainly multiple choice tests?  Because a good open-response test, which might take as much as 10 minutes to grade, means 25 hours of grading, where a test that can be put through a scanner and graded takes about 15 minutes total to grade, at about 10 scans per minute.)

I think that's probably enough to give you an idea how messed up our system is.
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

enfynet

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1691
  • Respect: +1162
    • View Profile
    • JD's Custom Clubs
Re: Education
« Reply #61 on: February 14, 2013, 04:13:44 pm »
0

I would have said everything Kirian said, and then I noticed he was describing Ohio, which is where I've done all my schooling (and living, thus far)...

The school system I was in was K-6 for elementary, 7-9 jr high, 10-12 high school.

1 High School
3 Jr High Schools
9 Elementary Schools
(along with numerous private and Christian schools)
Logged
"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious."

zporiri

  • Golem
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
  • Shuffle iT Username: zporiri
  • Go, and do likewise.
  • Respect: +130
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #62 on: February 14, 2013, 05:15:20 pm »
0

in almost of the public schools in Rhode Island, the system is:

elementary school: K-4
middle school: 5-8
high school: 9-12
Logged
Go, and do likewise.

SirPeebles

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3249
  • Respect: +5460
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #63 on: February 14, 2013, 05:54:43 pm »
0

in almost of the public schools in Rhode Island, the system is:

elementary school: K-4
middle school: 5-8
high school: 9-12

I went a middle school in Rhode Island, and it was definitely graded 6-8
Logged
Well you *do* need a signature...

Polk5440

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1708
  • Respect: +1788
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #64 on: February 14, 2013, 06:31:16 pm »
+1

I'd be interested in a summary of the US school system from anyone who's been through it.

How curious are you? Since Kirian brought up Ohio and I am familiar with the system there having both gone through it and studied it in economics classes in college, I would like to point out the Ohio Department of Education has one of the best sites describing the system, standard requirements, and testing. It has all the facts and aggregate data you could ever need, such as report cards to compare outcomes across districts, data on tests, practice tests, and per pupil funding by district.

...test results are not based on "did this student do better this year than last year," but "did the student do everything this year that s/he was supposed to."

I should mention that districts in Ohio are being pushed to consider "value add" seriously in terms of teacher compensation ("merit pay") and how they view student progress. This is generally met with resistance from teachers which is why progress is slow on this front both in terms in legislation and implementation.

Quote
Now, back to what gets taught.  In Ohio, to graduate, a high school student must pass 4 years of English, 3 years of math, science, and social studies, a year of phys ed, and various amounts of other things. 

See here for the details. Note the curriculum standards part of the requirement are updated every few years and the high school requirements are designed so that students can achieve them by the time they take the high stakes graduation test (OGT) in 10th grade, as Kirian describes above. Thus, while the standards don't mention calculus as a graduation requirement, students can complete calculus by their senior year if they take 4 years of math in high school (the "3 years of math" requirement Kirian notes above is increasing to 4 years soon); earlier if students select advanced tracks.

Also, on the college prep side, if you choose to be college bound, in 11th or 12th grade you take college readiness exams (either the SAT or ACT) which are used in college admissions decisions. Sometimes SAT subject tests (like physics or US history) are required, as well. If you take college prep courses in high school, there are AP or IB exams, as well. Passing these usually gives some kind of college credit.
Logged

Donald X.

  • Dominion Designer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6367
  • Respect: +25715
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #65 on: February 14, 2013, 07:49:34 pm »
+1

Graduation from High School is a prerequisite for college.
Except that you can take a test instead! That was true in my day and my skimpy research indicates that it still is.
Logged

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9415
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #66 on: February 14, 2013, 09:35:33 pm »
0

Man, how many Ohioans are there here?

Graduation from High School is a prerequisite for college.
Except that you can take a test instead! That was true in my day and my skimpy research indicates that it still is.


You know, I totally hadn't thought about that.  I've never actually seen the test; I wonder what it's like.
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

zporiri

  • Golem
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
  • Shuffle iT Username: zporiri
  • Go, and do likewise.
  • Respect: +130
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #67 on: February 15, 2013, 01:08:24 am »
0

in almost of the public schools in Rhode Island, the system is:

elementary school: K-4
middle school: 5-8
high school: 9-12

I went a middle school in Rhode Island, and it was definitely graded 6-8

hence the word almost :P
what middle school did you go to? i grew up in portsmouth
Logged
Go, and do likewise.

Davio

  • 2012 Dutch Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4787
  • Respect: +3413
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #68 on: February 15, 2013, 06:14:17 am »
0

Is that an age system?

In Holland it's something like:

Age 3/4-11/12: Basic school
Age 11/12-17/18: Middle school
Age 17/18-?: University

All ages are rough estimates and depend on student aptitude and when in the year they're born.
I was what was called an "early" student (born in August prior to the school year) and I skipped 1 class, so I started university at 16.

Our basic school has 8 grades, middle school has 4 to 6. Some middle schools are more focused on physical jobs like wood- and metalworking and they have less years, but you can start another school after that. My grammar school had 6 years.

University depends on how lazy you are and how much you can borrow, I was very lazy. :)
Logged

BSG: Cagprezimal Adama
Mage Knight: Arythea

TheMathProf

  • Scout
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 43
  • Respect: +7
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #69 on: February 16, 2013, 08:40:28 am »
+1

In addition, actual funding for the schools comes mainly from property taxes at the local level.  Only about 5% comes from federal money and 30-50% from the state.  However, the local money is not distributed among different localities to equalize things.  The property taxes are based on home values, which means neighboring districts can have vastly different budgets per pupil.  Rural districts often far the worst.

In addition, the amount of property tax given to the schools is determined by the voters in most localities.  Even a $10 a year hike in property taxes must be approved by 50% of voters.  Shockingly, it's easier to get such tax levies passed in more affluent communities, where it's more affordable.  In the less affluent communities, it's not uncommon for there to be bake sales and the like to get money to pay for advertising to convince voters.  This means that budgets can vary significantly from one year to the next, meaning teaching jobs and therefore class sizes fluctuate.

To give you an idea of how much things can differ from state-to-state, I teach high school math in the state of Washington (not to be confused with Washington D.C.).

The state of Washington has in its state constitution that "ample funding" for "basic education" by the state is the state's "paramount duty".  Because of this, the state has taken it upon themselves to try to do the majority of the funding for the schools within the state.  While Kirian cites that approximately 30-50% of the money comes from the state, in Washington State, that number approaches 75%.

Many parts of what individual local districts can do is limited by this state regulation.  For instance, local districts can raise funds, but the state has explicitly limited how much can be raised by local levy, as well as what can be done with it.  Since the state's current functional definition of basic education includes just five classes per day at the high school level, local levies often end up paying for the district's ability to offer a sixth class per day, and in some cases (but not many), a seventh.

Also, because the state considers it their duty to provide for basic education, salaries are set at the state level.  Because local levy money is limited in terms of the total dollars that can be raised and since most of it is used for providing additional classes per day (and accordingly, hiring the extra staff required to offer these classes), local levy dollars often don't significantly add to this total.  Local levy dollars are only allowed to be added to teacher salaries for TRI pay, where TRI is comprised of Time (you were required to spend more time, perhaps at trainings), Responsibility (you took on added responsibilities), and Incentive.  The Incentive dollars are light, because the districts don't have the funds to offer them, by and large.

While Kirian describes a system where the most affluent districts are best off financially, the reverse tends to happen to some degree in Washington state: because the cost-of-living in or near affluent districts is so high, but school districts in those areas can't offer a proportionally comparable salary, affluent districts often become training grounds for newer and younger teachers before folks move on to districts closer to home.  I teach in one of the more affluent districts in the state, live 45 minutes away in good traffic, and make 10% more than I would working for the high school five minutes from my house.  This is my 11th year teaching in that district, and at age 35, I have been the most senior member of the math department in my particular high school for six consecutive years now.

Kirian mentioned class sizes, and mine operates at an average of 34 students per class, where I teach five classes per day.  The more advanced classes tend to be larger so that we can focus more individual attention on the struggling students.  That seems to be more of a district-level decision than a state-level decision.
Logged

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9415
    • View Profile
Re: Education
« Reply #70 on: February 16, 2013, 03:22:55 pm »
+1

In addition, actual funding for the schools comes mainly from property taxes at the local level.  Only about 5% comes from federal money and 30-50% from the state.  However, the local money is not distributed among different localities to equalize things.  The property taxes are based on home values, which means neighboring districts can have vastly different budgets per pupil.  Rural districts often far the worst.

In addition, the amount of property tax given to the schools is determined by the voters in most localities.  Even a $10 a year hike in property taxes must be approved by 50% of voters.  Shockingly, it's easier to get such tax levies passed in more affluent communities, where it's more affordable.  In the less affluent communities, it's not uncommon for there to be bake sales and the like to get money to pay for advertising to convince voters.  This means that budgets can vary significantly from one year to the next, meaning teaching jobs and therefore class sizes fluctuate.

To give you an idea of how much things can differ from state-to-state, I teach high school math in the state of Washington (not to be confused with Washington D.C.).

The state of Washington has in its state constitution that "ample funding" for "basic education" by the state is the state's "paramount duty".  Because of this, the state has taken it upon themselves to try to do the majority of the funding for the schools within the state.  While Kirian cites that approximately 30-50% of the money comes from the state, in Washington State, that number approaches 75%.

Many parts of what individual local districts can do is limited by this state regulation.  For instance, local districts can raise funds, but the state has explicitly limited how much can be raised by local levy, as well as what can be done with it.  Since the state's current functional definition of basic education includes just five classes per day at the high school level, local levies often end up paying for the district's ability to offer a sixth class per day, and in some cases (but not many), a seventh.

Also, because the state considers it their duty to provide for basic education, salaries are set at the state level.  Because local levy money is limited in terms of the total dollars that can be raised and since most of it is used for providing additional classes per day (and accordingly, hiring the extra staff required to offer these classes), local levy dollars often don't significantly add to this total.  Local levy dollars are only allowed to be added to teacher salaries for TRI pay, where TRI is comprised of Time (you were required to spend more time, perhaps at trainings), Responsibility (you took on added responsibilities), and Incentive.  The Incentive dollars are light, because the districts don't have the funds to offer them, by and large.

While Kirian describes a system where the most affluent districts are best off financially, the reverse tends to happen to some degree in Washington state: because the cost-of-living in or near affluent districts is so high, but school districts in those areas can't offer a proportionally comparable salary, affluent districts often become training grounds for newer and younger teachers before folks move on to districts closer to home.  I teach in one of the more affluent districts in the state, live 45 minutes away in good traffic, and make 10% more than I would working for the high school five minutes from my house.  This is my 11th year teaching in that district, and at age 35, I have been the most senior member of the math department in my particular high school for six consecutive years now.

Kirian mentioned class sizes, and mine operates at an average of 34 students per class, where I teach five classes per day.  The more advanced classes tend to be larger so that we can focus more individual attention on the struggling students.  That seems to be more of a district-level decision than a state-level decision.

OMG I want to come teach in WA.
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

theory

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3603
  • Respect: +6125
    • View Profile
    • Dominion Strategy
Re: Education
« Reply #71 on: February 27, 2013, 04:02:09 pm »
0

Just curious, as I am a high school student, is there anything you feel that a high school student can do to improve their critical thinking skills? As I am strongly considering programming as a possible career(Taking an AP class in C next year after finishing this year!), I would love to be able to improve my critical thinking skills.

Here's my best bit of advice: Read with a pencil in hand (annotated reading/active reading). Thinking critically requires constant questioning (Why does the author/do I think this is true? Is he/Am I right? How could he/I be wrong here? What assumptions is he/am I making and are they correct? Are there other explanations that may be better? ...).

To expand on this subject -- near and dear to lawyers' hearts -- you should develop a habit of skepticism.  I don't mean skepticism as in, become a 9/11 truther: I mean skepticism in thinking about the motivations of your speaker, the likelihood of competing scenarios, and what you should believe.  Try to see both sides of the issue -- there almost always is one, and it's not just "xxx is evil and greedy".

Here's an example: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/new-yorkers-outraged-bureaucrats-order-city-change-lettering-single-street-sign-article-1.443695

If you read the first few paragraphs, you might get your pitchforks ready.  WTF, stupid bureaucrats, why are they forcing NY to pay $27M to change the font on signs?  How dumb, this is a sign of how dysfunctional BigGov is.

Exercise your critical thinking skills.  Is this what is really happening?  What's the actual likelihood that the DOT would arbitrarily decide that NYC has to change all its street signs all of a sudden?  Wouldn't the more logical thing be to just say, "When you replace these signs anyway, because of wear and tear, use these new ones instead of those old ones."

And as you read on, you realize that buried deep in the article, this is the actual plan, and the article concedes that there is no actual cost to NYC to doing this.

Another example: http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/03/19/bloomberg-strikes-again-nyc-bans-food-donations-to-the-homeless/

See if you can figure out for yourself why this is a stupidly sensationalistic article.  Note, for example, how the links provided don't back up the assertions at all, and how you have to do your own research to see that the article's thesis (that Bloomberg is banning food donations to the homeless because they can't assess their nutritional content) is something made up by the author, when the real reason (because it's goddamn unsafe to just dump unsanitary leftovers at a homeless shelter) goes entirely unmentioned.  Note the tone that the author takes, to deliberately try to goad you into outrage, and don't fall for it.

Relevant: http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-easy-ways-to-spot-b.s.-news-story-internet/

Quote
Any Time You See a Headline Like ...

"Vaccinated Children Five Times More Prone to Disease Than Unvaccinated Children" -NaturalNews.com

Or

"Studies Show That Online Gaming Can Add Years to Your Life" -i-Newswire

You Should Read It As ...

"Vaccinated Children Five Times More Prone to Disease Than Unvaccinated Children AND ALSO WI-FI IS CAUSING WORMS TO GROW IN YOUR BRAIN" -Hobo talking to his pet rat on the subway
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All
 

Page created in 3.078 seconds with 20 queries.