Cuzz is good. I'm fine with Eevee's refusal to participate. That is good information and it is on record. I think everyones talking alot and saying relatively nothing.
Ashersky is chock full of readception (and recently has been posting and phrasing arguments in a way that actually might have me convinced his scum and not just really wrong).
Eevee's vote on RaeRae is incredibly strange to me; maybe its just that hes following provocation from Ashersky (I know, readception of my own if that is actually the case but at least I'm trying to be honest with myself and its the reason I'm not voting for Eevee; I think my unease is more that you could replace Ashersky with anyone that is has a scum read on someone that few people share that says: Hey lets vote X and Eevee goes sure, especially when Eevee expressed other reads which he expanded to include Raerae after the vote?).
Cuzz's responses aren't really convincing the people that think that he is scum that he is not scum and is doing so in a very wordsy fashion.
Everyone else that is posting cases. Sure, thats fine but I think all I'm really going to take away from all that is who is making what case on who, not necessarily how strong those cases are. I dont think anything new is really being said from what I skim. Its just people finding the response to their cases just as scummy as their original cases, which is just arguably understandable confirmation biased.
So Ashersky moved his vote and Raerae is on board, Cuzz is back at L-2. I'm gonna ask of the people not recently involved with the cuzz wagon (momsalon, yuma, dsell, jim, theorel, robz) to just state (even if they did say it and I missed it, I'm sorry), which category you fall into:
1) You have similar-to-eevee staunch opposition to the Cuzz lynch
2) You are only not voting for Cuzz because you have a stronger scum read elsewhere
3) You are willing to vote Cuzz.