Holy biscuits, Erma! Reread and was super disappointed to find that shraeye had presented a case on Jimmmmm while I was reading as Jimmmmm was the person I was reading. So, sorry guys, shraeyerae has struck again.
On reread there were a few things that struck me wrong about Jimmmmm. The first came at post #77 when I felt he was a bit snappier than necessary at Lio. The second came at his response to me (#95), he seemed genuine (or buddyish) when he said that did read snappier than he intended but then he says this:
Yeah that reads a lot snappier than I meant. I was actually really surprised to see you telling me to settle, until I re-read my post, and you have a point. I just don't think you should vote for me in order to force me to claim. Vote for me if you think I'm scum, and we'll go from there. I actually don't think it's good for Town for us to discuss this (that is, my request not to lynch me before giving me a chance to claim) any further, and I was hoping not to have to claim until at least day 2 or 3.
Something about the bold says "Stop drawing attention to this! Shhhhh! Stop!!" And that just seems like he maybe caught himself saying something he shouldn't have, realized it, and is trying to make it go away.
Next, we have post 97 where he agrees with me in questioning ash for voting for eevee without real cause. Maybe it's just because I'm not used to you people agreeing with me but it felt sort of sheepy, trying to start a wagon.
Then we have post 114 where he redirects the little argument ash and I were having regarding my scumminess to his case on eevee. At first I read this as townie because, let's be honest, ash and I weren't helping anybody but scum with that sidetrack but after theory pointed out that scum would want to end the day quickly I began to rethink that, maybe it was just solid scum-redirection. Still not sold on that particular point but definitely don't see it as pure town anymore.
Post 162 is another example of him trying to shut down discussion but this time in regards to his "don't lynch me before I claim!" comment. I just don't like that he's trying to shut down conversation because that is the
only way for us to form opinions and analyze people.
Post 268 he wants to stop talking about the eevee case, again.
Post 273 says he voted for eevee to see how he'd respond to the pressure but it seems to me like Jimmmmm voted for eevee because of the case he had formed on him. Seems like he's trying to make it seem like it wasn't as big of a deal as he originally made it out to be.
Post 364 states that Cuzz and Galz seem to be the biggest targets today. I was super confused when I read that because I didn't remember either being heavy on anybody's radar. I went back a little bit and saw that yes, Cuzz did have two votes on him at that point but Galz didn't have a single one and people seemed to generally think he seemed townie. Just went back and skimmed one more time before posting this and still don't see anybody pointing serious fingers at Galz as of this (#364) post.
#367, 368, & 370 are him saying he'll vote for Cuzz for not participating but will give Galz a pass. Totally agree with shraeye here. It's strange wording at best.
#378 & 405 - shutting down conversation regarding eevee lynch, again (anybody sensing a pattern yet?)
#415 & 514 - Presents a flimsy case/read on momsalon that basically boils down to him being too new to read people as town or scum based on what they post. I don't agree with this and I don't like it. I suppose it isn't necessarily scummy by itself but coupled with everything above it feels like he's trying to draw suspicion around momsalon for no real reason.
So, in summary, I'm comfortable with a vote here.
Vote: Jimmmmm