If someone is coming out scummy to me from the Galzria-yuma minifight, it's definitely yuma. Robz says it pretty well, selfvoting in a situation where the vote cant lead to a lynch is just whatever and all in good fun. Whoever said yuma's strong stance against selfvoting feels forced, that was my first instinct too. However, why would scumyuma invent a strong opinion like this - just to justify sticking his vote on galzria? doesn't seem worth it, I probably shouldnt coach yuma in how to play scum but this reminds me of the switch game where he got a lot of heat for hammering the serial killer and almost got (mis)lynched. Inviyuma is scum, suspected Yuma is town until proven otherwise?
So, I conclude I don't find anything scummy in the galz-Yuma interaction. Looking back to sparkys reaction to my vote and the surprising traction it got from joth and axxle, I think it's interesting he chose to go for the classic Robz defense "I can see why you'd think that, and usually it would be right..". Now, I admit it's hard to respond to a case that essentially reads "your post felt insincere", but sparky didnt even try. That being said, I'm surprised joth and axxle saw my post worth sheeping. Not behaviour I'd expect from either, but as I've said I really like early wagons to get the game rolling, so I guess I should just be humbled someone thinks I'm worth sheeping. Might be the first time! Isn't it all but confirmed we have multiple scum teams? That pretty much changes the whole scumhunting routine around for me, wagon analysis gets less useful until its very late and trying to find people who aren't scumhunting isn't a way to find scum anymore. I actually have an idea for a way in a setup like this, but I'd rather observe a bit before telling it because its really easy for scum just not do it after I say what it is.
I'm starting to understand how galz writes his wall of texts from mobile, this isn't that bad.