Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 34  All

Author Topic: Through the Ages online  (Read 197997 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9413
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #475 on: June 16, 2013, 04:53:29 pm »
0

#43 is now full, but #44 is up

Always willing to hand you another beating.

Beatings are good for morale.
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
  • Respect: +3349
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #476 on: June 16, 2013, 05:22:21 pm »
0

#43 is now full, but #44 is up

Always willing to hand you another beating.

LIKE LIKE LIKE
Logged
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

Joseph2302

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 858
  • Shuffle iT Username: Joseph2302
  • "Better to be lucky than good"
  • Respect: +576
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #477 on: June 16, 2013, 06:19:22 pm »
0

It appears people have this crazy idea that I'm an easy target for wars & aggressions :(
Logged
Mafia Stats: (correct as of 2017)
Town: 22 games, 8 wins
Scum: 5 games, 3 wins

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
  • Respect: +3349
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #478 on: June 16, 2013, 07:00:43 pm »
0

This'll be the game where you get to 60 strength in age II then proceed to war/aggression me every turn, won't it?
Logged
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

Thisisnotasmile

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1493
  • Respect: +676
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #479 on: June 17, 2013, 02:16:18 am »
0

This'll be the game where you get to 60 strength in age II then proceed to war/aggression me every turn, won't it?

I honestly thought that's what was going to happen in f.DS41. Joe built up military early and was ahead (in strength and culture) for most of the game. Somehow I got an opportunity to raid his 2x Movies early in age three though, and that was pretty much the end of it.
Logged

ipofanes

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1439
  • Shuffle iT Username: ipofanes
  • Respect: +776
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #480 on: June 17, 2013, 05:17:20 am »
0

Raid II is the nastiest Aggression in the whole game. Quite a bit more powerful than Raid III in usual circumstances.
Logged
Lord Rattington denies my undo requests

Joseph2302

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 858
  • Shuffle iT Username: Joseph2302
  • "Better to be lucky than good"
  • Respect: +576
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #481 on: June 17, 2013, 10:59:49 am »
0


I honestly thought that's what was going to happen in f.DS41. Joe built up military early and was ahead (in strength and culture) for most of the game. Somehow I got an opportunity to raid his 2x Movies early in age three though, and that was pretty much the end of it.

Was slightly disappointed to be doing well in military for so long, and then let it slip, raiding 2 movies was basically the end of my chances :(

On a random,, unconnected note, is it possible to produce less than 0 culture a turn? If you are producing 0 culture, and then play a pact where you produce 1 less culture per turn, do you now produce 0 or -1 culture?
Logged
Mafia Stats: (correct as of 2017)
Town: 22 games, 8 wins
Scum: 5 games, 3 wins

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
  • Respect: +3349
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #482 on: June 17, 2013, 12:28:03 pm »
0

0 is the lower limit, 30 is the upper limit. Same for science. Max science held is 40, while Culture is unlimited. Strength is 0-60.
Logged
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

ipofanes

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1439
  • Shuffle iT Username: ipofanes
  • Respect: +776
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #483 on: June 18, 2013, 02:40:22 am »
0

0 is the lower limit, 30 is the upper limit.
For what?
Logged
Lord Rattington denies my undo requests

Thisisnotasmile

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1493
  • Respect: +676
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #484 on: June 18, 2013, 02:46:32 am »
0

0 is the lower limit, 30 is the upper limit.
For what?

Culture production per turn. (Science too)

On an unrelated note, Agricola has knocked TTA out of the #2 spot on BGG. Sad times.
« Last Edit: June 18, 2013, 02:48:30 am by Thisisnotasmile »
Logged

ipofanes

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1439
  • Shuffle iT Username: ipofanes
  • Respect: +776
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #485 on: June 18, 2013, 03:08:03 am »
0

0 is the lower limit, 30 is the upper limit.
For what?

Culture production per turn. (Science too)

Ah, but there is only one pact that lets you bleed culture (Loss of Sovereignity) with the upside for the bleeding nation that it cannot be attacked. If you feel you have to pull a Gandhi and have a culture production of less than 2, then quitting would be the way to go.
Logged
Lord Rattington denies my undo requests

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
  • Respect: +3349
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #486 on: June 18, 2013, 03:28:31 am »
0

0 is the lower limit, 30 is the upper limit.
For what?

Culture production per turn. (Science too)

On an unrelated note, Agricola has knocked TTA out of the #2 spot on BGG. Sad times.

This is fairly normal. They jump around each other quite often.
Logged
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9413
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #487 on: June 18, 2013, 08:20:47 am »
0

0 is the lower limit, 30 is the upper limit.
For what?

Culture production per turn. (Science too)

On an unrelated note, Agricola has knocked TTA out of the #2 spot on BGG. Sad times.

What's number one?
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

ipofanes

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1439
  • Shuffle iT Username: ipofanes
  • Respect: +776
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #488 on: June 18, 2013, 08:36:46 am »
0

Logged
Lord Rattington denies my undo requests

Drab Emordnilap

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1832
  • Shuffle iT Username: Drab Emordnilap
  • Luther Bell Hendricks V
  • Respect: +1887
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #489 on: June 18, 2013, 09:05:55 pm »
0

#45 is up.
Logged

ipofanes

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1439
  • Shuffle iT Username: ipofanes
  • Respect: +776
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #490 on: June 19, 2013, 07:25:28 am »
0

Could someone of the participants rename the game in order to get consistent with the others? Facilitates searching.

Thanks.
Logged
Lord Rattington denies my undo requests

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
  • Respect: +3349
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #491 on: June 19, 2013, 10:16:47 pm »
0

Now that exams are done, time to play somet TtA.

Have games 47 and 46. A 4 player Global and a 3 player Base.
Logged
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

ipofanes

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1439
  • Shuffle iT Username: ipofanes
  • Respect: +776
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #492 on: June 24, 2013, 07:26:49 am »
0

How would you handle Biskupin when the total strength is so high that it is capped at 60? bg-o.com deducts two strength points from the capped value down to 58, even if your strength constituents add up to, say, 67. I find this a bit harsh as you could easily deduct the 2 points Biskupin provides from the 67 total and then cap.


Logged
Lord Rattington denies my undo requests

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
  • Respect: +3349
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #493 on: June 24, 2013, 08:47:38 am »
0

Mmm... that doesn't sound right to me. Biskupin says the strength bonus doesn't apply during aggressions, not -2 strength during aggressions. If you have 62+ strength, then during aggressions you should have 60 strength, and be capped.
Logged
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

Joseph2302

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 858
  • Shuffle iT Username: Joseph2302
  • "Better to be lucky than good"
  • Respect: +576
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #494 on: June 24, 2013, 11:35:34 am »
0

Mmm... that doesn't sound right to me. Biskupin says the strength bonus doesn't apply during aggressions, not -2 strength during aggressions. If you have 62+ strength, then during aggressions you should have 60 strength, and be capped.

This is exactly what I thought.. also, F.DS 48 up :)
Logged
Mafia Stats: (correct as of 2017)
Town: 22 games, 8 wins
Scum: 5 games, 3 wins

ipofanes

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1439
  • Shuffle iT Username: ipofanes
  • Respect: +776
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #495 on: June 25, 2013, 03:40:08 am »
0

Mmm... that doesn't sound right to me. Biskupin says the strength bonus doesn't apply during aggressions, not -2 strength during aggressions. If you have 62+ strength, then during aggressions you should have 60 strength, and be capped.

This should go into a bug report. Does anyone have write access to the bg-o forum? I don't feel like extending the number of passwords I have to handle.
Logged
Lord Rattington denies my undo requests

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
  • Respect: +3349
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #496 on: June 25, 2013, 11:11:02 am »
0

I do, can someone give me a link to a game where it lowered your strength to 58?
Logged
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

ipofanes

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1439
  • Shuffle iT Username: ipofanes
  • Respect: +776
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #497 on: June 25, 2013, 12:02:37 pm »
0

Thanks. http://boardgaming-online.com/index.php?cnt=52&pl=201832&nat=1 Aggression played at 2013-06-20 11:06:00

It was my opponent actually who got hosed, and I was too inattentive to notice that he had, in fact, >60 strength, otherwise I would have GGG'd and sac to match up at 60.

He still won :-P
Logged
Lord Rattington denies my undo requests

ipofanes

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1439
  • Shuffle iT Username: ipofanes
  • Respect: +776
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #498 on: June 28, 2013, 02:44:14 am »
0

Thanks for reporting, and thanks for mentioning me as a "friend" and not "victim".

That SirDusk gentleman is quite stubborn, I almost feel like setting up an account on this ad-ridden forum myself.
Logged
Lord Rattington denies my undo requests

Kuildeous

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3840
  • Respect: +2221
    • View Profile
Re: Through the Ages online
« Reply #499 on: June 28, 2013, 08:30:04 am »
0

That SirDusk gentleman is quite stubborn, I almost feel like setting up an account on this ad-ridden forum myself.

What is SirDusk saying? Could someone post Cliff's Notes about that here?
Logged
A man has no signature
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 34  All
 

Page created in 1.801 seconds with 21 queries.