Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 ... 103 104 [105] 106 107 ... 226  All

Author Topic: Interview with Donald X.  (Read 2145418 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Donald X.

  • Dominion Designer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6367
  • Respect: +25712
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2600 on: January 16, 2016, 05:26:11 pm »
+1

Has a reprint of Adventures been released yet? I'm still one of those guys who hates the flimsier cards.
No. It is not a good time for me to estimate when it will happen; I'll know more later.
Logged

Limetime

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1237
  • Shuffle iT Username: limetime
  • Respect: +1179
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2601 on: January 16, 2016, 10:02:58 pm »
0

We know that your good at making dominon. The question is whether you are good at Dominion.
Logged

Donald X.

  • Dominion Designer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6367
  • Respect: +25712
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2602 on: January 16, 2016, 10:48:41 pm »
+13

We know that your good at making dominon. The question is whether you are good at Dominion.
What about my good at making Dominion?

I hold my own irl. Now you just need to find out how good those guys are.
Logged

SCSN

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2227
  • Respect: +7140
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2603 on: January 17, 2016, 05:24:54 am »
+12

I played Donald once: he won. Extrapolate to your liking.
Logged

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
  • Respect: +3349
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2604 on: January 17, 2016, 06:15:19 am »
+11

I played Donald once: he won. Extrapolate to your liking.

Very well. If you played Donald at Dominion 100 times in a row, you would have a 100 game losing streak.

I'm not very good at this extrapolation thing
Logged
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

Witherweaver

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6476
  • Shuffle iT Username: Witherweaver
  • Respect: +7866
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2605 on: January 17, 2016, 12:05:36 pm »
+1

I played Lord Bottington once: I lost.  You can extrapolate.
Logged

Roadrunner7671

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1845
  • Shuffle iT Username: Roadrunner7672
  • Forum Mafia Record: 18-33-2
  • Respect: +1346
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2606 on: January 17, 2016, 12:08:18 pm »
+15

I played Lord Bottington once: I lost.  You can extrapolate.
You need to win the Rats split.
Logged
Oh God someone delete this before Roadrunner sees it.

GendoIkari

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9709
  • Respect: +10765
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2607 on: January 17, 2016, 12:24:16 pm »
+15

I played Donald once: he won. Extrapolate to your liking.

Logged
Check out my F.DS extension for Chrome! Card links; Dominion icons, and maybe more! http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=13363.0

Thread for Firefox version:
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=16305.0

Eran of Arcadia

  • Apprentice
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 278
  • Respect: +514
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2608 on: January 26, 2016, 02:26:01 pm »
+2

I was reading the flavor text for the base game over dinner last night (as I do) and I noticed that it mentioned 3 of what would become card names in later expansions (Feodum, Minion, Treasury.) Was this in any way intentional? I ask especially for feodum because unlike the others it's a pretty obscure word.
Logged

Donald X.

  • Dominion Designer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6367
  • Respect: +25712
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2609 on: January 26, 2016, 03:54:45 pm »
+12

I was reading the flavor text for the base game over dinner last night (as I do) and I noticed that it mentioned 3 of what would become card names in later expansions (Feodum, Minion, Treasury.) Was this in any way intentional? I ask especially for feodum because unlike the others it's a pretty obscure word.
I named Feodum that because it was in the first blurb (which predated it). The others weren't especially intentional; they were good as card names for the same reasons they were good as blurb details.
Logged

Donald X.

  • Dominion Designer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6367
  • Respect: +25712
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2610 on: January 26, 2016, 03:58:36 pm »
+8

I played Donald once: he won. Extrapolate to your liking.
This is one of those examples of how experience with the cards is significant. I bought up the Gears and put Lost Arts on them. SCSN didn't compete for the Gears; he hadn't seen that combo in action before.
Logged

yuma

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 695
  • Respect: +609
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2611 on: January 26, 2016, 05:06:00 pm »
+3

I was reading the flavor text for the base game over dinner last night (as I do) and I noticed that it mentioned 3 of what would become card names in later expansions (Feodum, Minion, Treasury.) Was this in any way intentional? I ask especially for feodum because unlike the others it's a pretty obscure word.
I named Feodum that because it was in the first blurb (which predated it). The others weren't especially intentional; they were good as card names for the same reasons they were good as blurb details.

Does that mean we can look forward to names such as:

Fife, Freehold, Petty Lord, Banner and Anarchy?
Logged

Eran of Arcadia

  • Apprentice
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 278
  • Respect: +514
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2612 on: January 26, 2016, 05:32:05 pm »
+3

I was reading the flavor text for the base game over dinner last night (as I do) and I noticed that it mentioned 3 of what would become card names in later expansions (Feodum, Minion, Treasury.) Was this in any way intentional? I ask especially for feodum because unlike the others it's a pretty obscure word.
I named Feodum that because it was in the first blurb (which predated it). The others weren't especially intentional; they were good as card names for the same reasons they were good as blurb details.

Does that mean we can look forward to names such as:

Fife, Freehold, Petty Lord, Banner and Anarchy?

I compiled a list of card names that need cards.
Logged

ashersky

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
  • Respect: +1520
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2613 on: January 27, 2016, 03:04:57 am »
+1

Any thoughts about a novelization of the game?  Or asking/letting someone else (Brandon Sanderson, etc.) do it?
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

Donald X.

  • Dominion Designer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6367
  • Respect: +25712
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2614 on: January 27, 2016, 05:51:22 am »
+7

Any thoughts about a novelization of the game?  Or asking/letting someone else (Brandon Sanderson, etc.) do it?
No, but I'll consider it now. Well. If it doesn't use my jokes then what's the point? If it uses my jokes then I want to be the one writing it. And if I'm the one writing it then it will be something else.
Logged

ashersky

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
  • Respect: +1520
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2615 on: January 27, 2016, 06:55:34 am »
+1

Any thoughts about a novelization of the game?  Or asking/letting someone else (Brandon Sanderson, etc.) do it?
No, but I'll consider it now. Well. If it doesn't use my jokes then what's the point? If it uses my jokes then I want to be the one writing it. And if I'm the one writing it then it will be something else.

I guess the point would be we'd all buy them and enjoy them?  We've had shared worlds covered by multiple authors for years (remember Dragonlance and Forgotten Realms?), so why not a Dominion world that you define, even write your own first few trilogies set there, and then dozens of fantasy greats could join.

It could be sort of Xanth-y with the jokes, instead of serious.  Wouldn't even need a [serious] in the title.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

Davio

  • 2012 Dutch Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4787
  • Respect: +3413
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2616 on: January 27, 2016, 06:56:48 am »
0

Which other game captures the essence of Dominion best without being a total ripoff?

I.e.: you can actually admire what someone did with the deckbuilding idea.
Logged

BSG: Cagprezimal Adama
Mage Knight: Arythea

Witherweaver

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6476
  • Shuffle iT Username: Witherweaver
  • Respect: +7866
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2617 on: January 27, 2016, 07:47:19 am »
+6

Any thoughts about a novelization of the game?  Or asking/letting someone else (Brandon Sanderson, etc.) do it?
No, but I'll consider it now. Well. If it doesn't use my jokes then what's the point? If it uses my jokes then I want to be the one writing it. And if I'm the one writing it then it will be something else.

I think it should be a love story, and should be written by ADK :/
Logged

Donald X.

  • Dominion Designer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6367
  • Respect: +25712
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2618 on: January 27, 2016, 03:33:45 pm »
0

Any thoughts about a novelization of the game?  Or asking/letting someone else (Brandon Sanderson, etc.) do it?
No, but I'll consider it now. Well. If it doesn't use my jokes then what's the point? If it uses my jokes then I want to be the one writing it. And if I'm the one writing it then it will be something else.

I guess the point would be we'd all buy them and enjoy them?  We've had shared worlds covered by multiple authors for years (remember Dragonlance and Forgotten Realms?), so why not a Dominion world that you define, even write your own first few trilogies set there, and then dozens of fantasy greats could join.

It could be sort of Xanth-y with the jokes, instead of serious.  Wouldn't even need a [serious] in the title.
I'm not seeing it. I don't see what you get other than cashing in on Dominion. Which is better, the best shared world I define, or the best shared world I define that has to involve Dominion?
Logged

Donald X.

  • Dominion Designer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6367
  • Respect: +25712
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2619 on: January 27, 2016, 03:36:39 pm »
+1

Which other game captures the essence of Dominion best without being a total ripoff?

I.e.: you can actually admire what someone did with the deckbuilding idea.
Those are not the same question.

I haven't played any Dominion-based games except my own. In interviews I always cite Eminent Domain and A Few Acres of Snow as examples of how you can be inspired by Dominion without just cloning it, but I haven't actually played those games.
Logged

GendoIkari

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9709
  • Respect: +10765
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2620 on: January 27, 2016, 06:17:04 pm »
0

Which other game captures the essence of Dominion best without being a total ripoff?

I.e.: you can actually admire what someone did with the deckbuilding idea.
Those are not the same question.

I haven't played any Dominion-based games except my own. In interviews I always cite Eminent Domain and A Few Acres of Snow as examples of how you can be inspired by Dominion without just cloning it, but I haven't actually played those games.

Eminent Domain is 10% Dominion and 90% Race for the Galaxy.
Logged
Check out my F.DS extension for Chrome! Card links; Dominion icons, and maybe more! http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=13363.0

Thread for Firefox version:
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=16305.0

Witherweaver

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6476
  • Shuffle iT Username: Witherweaver
  • Respect: +7866
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2621 on: January 27, 2016, 06:22:49 pm »
+7

Which other game captures the essence of Dominion best without being a total ripoff?

I.e.: you can actually admire what someone did with the deckbuilding idea.
Those are not the same question.

I haven't played any Dominion-based games except my own. In interviews I always cite Eminent Domain and A Few Acres of Snow as examples of how you can be inspired by Dominion without just cloning it, but I haven't actually played those games.

Eminent Domain is 7--10% Dominion and 90--93% Race for the Galaxy.

Fixed that for you...
Logged

A Drowned Kernel

  • 2015 World Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1067
  • They/Them
  • Respect: +1980
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2622 on: January 27, 2016, 07:42:11 pm »
+1

I would read a book by Donald X., and I would be more excited for it if I knew that it wasn't Dominion themed. My stupid fanfiction aside, Dominion doesn't have a coherent story or a fleshed-out world behind it. A Dominion novel would just be a story set in a generic medieval fantasy world with a few Dominion references thrown in.
Logged
The perfect engine
But it will never go off
Three piles are empty

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9413
    • View Profile
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2623 on: January 27, 2016, 07:45:19 pm »
0

Which other game captures the essence of Dominion best without being a total ripoff?

I.e.: you can actually admire what someone did with the deckbuilding idea.
Those are not the same question.

I haven't played any Dominion-based games except my own. In interviews I always cite Eminent Domain and A Few Acres of Snow as examples of how you can be inspired by Dominion without just cloning it, but I haven't actually played those games.

Eminent Domain is 10% Dominion and 90% Race for the Galaxy.

Nah, it's more like 70% Dominion/30% Race.
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

Awaclus

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11817
  • Shuffle iT Username: Awaclus
  • (´。• ω •。`)
  • Respect: +12870
    • View Profile
    • Birds of Necama
Re: Interview with Donald X.
« Reply #2624 on: January 27, 2016, 07:55:27 pm »
0

Which other game captures the essence of Dominion best without being a total ripoff?

I.e.: you can actually admire what someone did with the deckbuilding idea.
Those are not the same question.

I haven't played any Dominion-based games except my own. In interviews I always cite Eminent Domain and A Few Acres of Snow as examples of how you can be inspired by Dominion without just cloning it, but I haven't actually played those games.

Eminent Domain is 7--10% Dominion and 90--93% Race for the Galaxy.

Fixed that for you...

It's more Dominion than people think.
Logged
Bomb, Cannon, and many of the Gunpowder cards can strongly effect gameplay, particularly in a destructive way

The YouTube channel where I make musicDownload my band's Creative Commons albums for free
Pages: 1 ... 103 104 [105] 106 107 ... 226  All
 

Page created in 2.065 seconds with 20 queries.