V/LA fyi: my life sucks till dec. 1 and gets substantially better after then.
anyway i've been following today on my cellphone.
my brief thoughts as far as defensiveness goes: when someone says "person B is scummy," the complete meaning is usually: person B did thing A, and I think people who do thing A are scummy for reasons X, Y, and Z.
if you are person B in this scenario, and you happen to be town, you have a few possible rebuttals, but they depend on the truth of the variables. Maybe you did thing A, and you broadly agree with X, Y, and Z, but what can you say, you weren't doing thing A to be [misleading/confusing/get a townie mislycnhed]. Maybe you did thing A, but you don't think thing A is a scumtell, because you disagree with X, Y, and Z.
in either of those scenarios, I think defensiveness is appropriate, even a human reaction, but over-defensiveness is unnecessary and can be a scumtell e.g. I am thinking of a game that has not yet concluded (I am sad that Robz called my defensiveness annoying! That's what IBGTennis said and he was scum!)
However, if you DIDN'T DO THING A, then i think you should scream bloody murder. the reason is that this game has a notorious "truth creation" problem. This is how I went down in MIX as doctor. There was just this completely unbacked-up assumption that I had done something scummy, but it became truth because it just kept getting shouted louder and louder and everyone who came in late to the party was like "oh, ehunt must've done something scummy". So I think it's completely fine to say, hey, thing A didn't happen. That's how I felt at TheMunch in this game when he said I was being opportunistic by jumping on eevee.
Anyway Robz rebuttal to Volt is of the "I didn't do thing A" variety and I therefore think legitimate even if Volt was the only pressure on him. But there are tons of votes on Robz! So i don't think the defensiveness is a scumtell at all.