I don't like it.
What don't you like? Talking about the game? Having some kindof agreed upon chicken code before we start getting chickened?
You're specific method of chickens talking. It's too convoluted. Using your chicken vote only is an obvious way to give scumtells. Like Chickenvote: Robz should mean you suspect Robz, not this crazy system where I have to combine 'chicken(s)' with chickenvotes to show who I'm referring to and what I think.
If I don't chickenvote somebody, it's because I don't have a read on them. If I need to say a townread, I could make a post with only
Chickenvote: Frisk
Chicken Unvote
(or multiple town reads).
After all, its much more important to be able to show who you suspect. Our system should be easy to understand, and simple to use especially for things which will come up frequently, and hard to mess up. Your system was something I would for sure make mistakes in.
1 chicken for yes, 2 chickens for no makes sense, and I can keep that, 3 means something not yes/no. I can keep that system for use when somebody directly asks the chicken a question. If you want to refer to a specific person (maybe you want to agree with somebody--1 chicken; or disagree--2 chickens; or maybe multiple questions were asked) you could take three lines to say
Chickenvote: Cuzz
chicken
Chicken Unvote.