I like Archetype's review of C_F (even if it seems a bit OMGUS-fueled) who I also rank on the scummy side. He was the antithesis of lurker on D1, but didn't offer much, and instead wagon hunted and had others do his work for him. But more than that, his throwaway response to Arch was not helpful at all, and doesn't paint him in a town light.
what did you like about Arch's case on CF? Do you agree with all of it?
I felt the case on Robz was good, and clearly I wasn't the only one. So I disagree that that is a good reason to vote for me now. I am just the easy target for scum to push, as I look awfully bad after the Robz flip. Honestly, I expected it.
When you wrote this, there were four people voting for you. eevee, me, grujah and shraeye. You have stated that you have town reads on eevee and grujah. So does that mean you think shraeye and I are the scum pushing your wagon?
On the Arch position on CF: I agree with the sentiment that Frisk has been more anti-town in his play than usually, and that he tunneled a bit on D1. I went back to re-read (#1017 for reference) and I think he lost something in the way he wrote it, but he's generally on when he says that Frisk was on both wagons, voted for Arch for odd reasons, and CF's lack of answer to his comments.
More than that, the fact that Frisk hadn't responded well to any comments at least up through my post (he did respond to Shraeye) looked bad. His reactions to others was scummy.
On your second question, I think it's very possible that my wagon is town led. I led Robz's lynch as town, after all. I'm the easy target for scum to push, sure, but I could see town doing it. On who of the four on my wagon could be scum, you noted my reads already, and I've mentioned Shraeye as scummish. You were lurky on D1, more active on D2, but you had a V/LA type excuse I think. Your contributions seem to be good, if wrong (on me). And if I'm wrong on Grujah, I'm wrong on Galz, as I still think of them has to be scum.