Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[ftl]

Right, it's OMGUS.

[Captain_Frisk]

What is wrong with this game?  We're 2 days to deadline, and we can't even get a candidate to 50% of the votes required to lynch?

I'm going to go full meta and say that I will not vote for eHunt.  His lock on my scummitude reads the same way as M6, but its a lot funnier this time because he's wrong this time, and every time he says something, I just think about drunken kickball - which is the 2nd best thing to ever happen to this forum (#1 is the DXV lynching of Personman)

A few people have asked for my reads on everyone.  I apologize - but I don't have time for that tonight.

Galzria - you've only posted 10% more than me this game.  What's going on? 

mod - can we get a prod on shark_bait / grujah? 

[Galzria]

What is wrong with this game?  We're 2 days to deadline, and we can't even get a candidate to 50% of the votes required to lynch?

I'm going to go full meta and say that I will not vote for eHunt.  His lock on my scummitude reads the same way as M6, but its a lot funnier this time because he's wrong this time, and every time he says something, I just think about drunken kickball - which is the 2nd best thing to ever happen to this forum (#1 is the DXV lynching of Personman)

A few people have asked for my reads on everyone.  I apologize - but I don't have time for that tonight.

Galzria - you've only posted 10% more than me this game.  What's going on?

mod - can we get a prod on shark_bait / grujah?

Yes, and there's already 600+ pages to slog through D1... M-VI was a nightmare in the later days trying to go back and build a case against people. Results and actions will be far more useful in days to come, I think. No need to flood with unneeded noise (like this post of mine here).

[Galzria]

600+ posts*, obviously.

[ehunt]

How is that scummy? It might be confusing, but I don't think it's necessarily something that scum would say rather than town.

Because it's so ridiculously contrived, and it's obviously not a scumtell to be morgrim hunting hunting hunting?

Hell, he just forced us to introduce the term Morgrim Hunting Hunting Hunting Hunting. IE stupid jockeying between two people.

It's the unstoppable Morgrim Hunting Hunting Hunting Hunting Hunting Hunting Party stack!

On a serious note:  It's also a thinly veiled OMGUS.  "I'm not scummy, the people suspecting me are scummy!"

Phone post. Phrase Morgrim hunting hunting hunting intended lightheartedly, thought this was clear.

[Voltgloss]

What is wrong with this game?  We're 2 days to deadline, and we can't even get a candidate to 50% of the votes required to lynch?

Well, we have one candidate past the 50% mark (ehunt, with 5 votes), but you decided you won't vote for him.  :p

That said, the OMGUS discussion re: ehunt brought something else to my eye:  Insomniac's #587 reply to Axxle.  Which is really blatant OMGUS.  Rather than address Axxle's actual argument - that Insom's post history lacks content and shows flip-flopping - Insom instead turned around and attacked (and voted) Axxle for allegedly "starting two wagons."  And I have to agree with Axxle that the ehunt wagon has been driven by others (me included). 

I've been suspicious of Axxle before, but Insom's response feels even scummier to me.  I still like my ehunt vote but I think Insom just became my #2 choice.

[Galzria]

Well, let's build pressure now, instead of within 24 hours to deadline, shall we? vote: ehunt.

Not only was he lurking early game (to the point that I quite literally forgot he was here), but he's come during the last 24 hours or so and seemed to push to disband the few wagons we did have going - wagons that I still like more than anybody here (Axxle).

[ehunt]

Well, let's build pressure now, instead of within 24 hours to deadline, shall we? vote: ehunt.

Not only was he lurking early game (to the point that I quite literally forgot he was here), but he's come during the last 24 hours or so and seemed to push to disband the few wagons we did have going - wagons that I still like more than anybody here (Axxle).

One post ago, you just defended the practice of not posting too much.

[ehunt]

O's case on me scummiest (ehunt used the word hunting three times in a row, therefore i'll push his wagon over the 50% line), Galz second scummiest (I've been derailing the terrible axxle wagon for days!).

[Galzria]

Well, let's build pressure now, instead of within 24 hours to deadline, shall we? vote: ehunt.

Not only was he lurking early game (to the point that I quite literally forgot he was here), but he's come during the last 24 hours or so and seemed to push to disband the few wagons we did have going - wagons that I still like more than anybody here (Axxle).

One post ago, you just defended the practice of not posting too much.

Your point? Deadline is coming, and we really should lynch someone scummy. My Axxle vote is going nowhere. You're more scummy to me than Insomniac. So the vote goes on you.

[Galzria]

O's case on me scummiest (ehunt used the word hunting three times in a row, therefore i'll push his wagon over the 50% line), Galz second scummiest (I've been derailing the terrible axxle wagon for days!).

Axxle is still, hands down no question the scummiest person ITT.

[ehunt]

unvote - wagon on me scummier than anything cf did.

[ehunt]

Robz eevee yuma all seem town, although robz vote on me scummy. Galzria seemed town until his recent inconsistency. Volt i'm not sure on. Scummiest on wagon is still probably O.

vote: O

[Galzria]

Robz eevee yuma all seem town, although robz vote on me scummy. Galzria seemed town until his recent inconsistency. Volt i'm not sure on. Scummiest on wagon is still probably O.

vote: O

What inconsistency?

[ehunt]

602 galzria doesn't post much therefore galzria is good
606 ehunt doesn't post much therefore ehunt is bad

Also missing that I've been defending axxle for a lot longer than a day.

[Galzria]

602 galzria doesn't post much therefore galzria is good
606 ehunt doesn't post much therefore ehunt is bad

Also missing that I've been defending axxle for a lot longer than a day.

It's your defense of Axxle that makes you scummy more than anything.

And yeah, I noted yesterday that I had that "holy expletive" moment when I realized you were in the game. Did you just happen to forget that post of mine?

[ehunt]

602 galzria doesn't post much therefore galzria is good
606 ehunt doesn't post much therefore ehunt is bad

Also missing that I've been defending axxle for a lot longer than a day.

It's your defense of Axxle that makes you scummy more than anything.

And yeah, I noted yesterday that I had that "holy expletive" moment when I realized you were in the game. Did you just happen to forget that post of mine?

Before you said the axxle defense was scummy because I did it at the last minute. Now you say the defense qua the defense is scummy. I'm not going to debate somebody who shifts his arguments around instead of listening and acknowledging when he's wrong. It's not my fault that you didn't notice my earlier posts defending axxle.

[Axxle]

I'm warming to an eHunt lynch because of recent OMGUS.

@eHunt: remind me why you were voting for Frisk?

Why are you voting for Frisk, again?

He (possibly RVS) votes Morgrim. Later, a fight about Morgrim happens; Frisk defends the case on Morgrim. I call him out for it and vote. He responds sarcastically. Time passes, and then he unvotes, saying it was just RVS, even though he had been defensive about it before. He's posted 8 times since then, and that was like a week ago. In those 8 posts, his only substantive one is IIoA. He also voted for Robz, a wagon that I don't like at all.

I did not see CF defend his case on Morgrim *at all* except for joking (bad in itself).  You calling out Morgrim seemed to be a joke, so I'm not surprised CF responded sarcastically, especially if it really was RVS.


side note: If Morgrim flips scum, eHunt is scum, but not necessarily the other way around.

[ehunt]

I'm warming to an eHunt lynch because of recent OMGUS.

@eHunt: remind me why you were voting for Frisk?

Why are you voting for Frisk, again?

He (possibly RVS) votes Morgrim. Later, a fight about Morgrim happens; Frisk defends the case on Morgrim. I call him out for it and vote. He responds sarcastically. Time passes, and then he unvotes, saying it was just RVS, even though he had been defensive about it before. He's posted 8 times since then, and that was like a week ago. In those 8 posts, his only substantive one is IIoA. He also voted for Robz, a wagon that I don't like at all.

I did not see CF defend his case on Morgrim *at all* except for joking (bad in itself).  You calling out Morgrim seemed to be a joke, so I'm not surprised CF responded sarcastically, especially if it really was RVS.


side note: If Morgrim flips scum, eHunt is scum, but not necessarily the other way around.

194, which I didn't read as a joke.

Omgus is not a tell and I don't know why this forum thinks it is. There's a wagon on me fueled in part by terrible arguments. I'm going to assume scum are making them and call it as I see it. No regrets.

[Galzria]

602 galzria doesn't post much therefore galzria is good
606 ehunt doesn't post much therefore ehunt is bad

Also missing that I've been defending axxle for a lot longer than a day.

It's your defense of Axxle that makes you scummy more than anything.

And yeah, I noted yesterday that I had that "holy expletive" moment when I realized you were in the game. Did you just happen to forget that post of mine?

Before you said the axxle defense was scummy because I did it at the last minute. Now you say the defense qua the defense is scummy. I'm not going to debate somebody who shifts his arguments around instead of listening and acknowledging when he's wrong. It's not my fault that you didn't notice my earlier posts defending axxle.

I said "cases" derailed, not "case". I cited Axxle because he's the wagon I felt had merit. Your exact statement was"Robz and Axxle wagons are bad". No explanation was given, just "they're bad, now go look somewhere else"... And this is within 72 hours to the deadline. It's intentionally stirring things up late, with no real reason, and it read scummy to me. ((#562, in case you forgot))

[Insomniac]

I wasn't responding to Axxle's accusation of me, I don't see any merit to it I haven't been any more flip floppy or lurky than anyone else here. My post was calling out Axxle for doing some super scummy things recently in his attempt to appear pro-town.

[ehunt]

602 galzria doesn't post much therefore galzria is good
606 ehunt doesn't post much therefore ehunt is bad

Also missing that I've been defending axxle for a lot longer than a day.

It's your defense of Axxle that makes you scummy more than anything.

And yeah, I noted yesterday that I had that "holy expletive" moment when I realized you were in the game. Did you just happen to forget that post of mine?

Before you said the axxle defense was scummy because I did it at the last minute. Now you say the defense qua the defense is scummy. I'm not going to debate somebody who shifts his arguments around instead of listening and acknowledging when he's wrong. It's not my fault that you didn't notice my earlier posts defending axxle.

I said "cases" derailed, not "case". I cited Axxle because he's the wagon I felt had merit. Your exact statement was"Robz and Axxle wagons are bad". No explanation was given, just "they're bad, now go look somewhere else"... And this is within 72 hours to the deadline. It's intentionally stirring things up late, with no real reason, and it read scummy to me. ((#562, in case you forgot))

Reasons for both given earlier. Through debating you, you don't read my posts then act like I didn't make any and you refuse to acknowledge when you are wrong.

[Galzria]

602 galzria doesn't post much therefore galzria is good
606 ehunt doesn't post much therefore ehunt is bad

Also missing that I've been defending axxle for a lot longer than a day.

It's your defense of Axxle that makes you scummy more than anything.

And yeah, I noted yesterday that I had that "holy expletive" moment when I realized you were in the game. Did you just happen to forget that post of mine?

Before you said the axxle defense was scummy because I did it at the last minute. Now you say the defense qua the defense is scummy. I'm not going to debate somebody who shifts his arguments around instead of listening and acknowledging when he's wrong. It's not my fault that you didn't notice my earlier posts defending axxle.

I said "cases" derailed, not "case". I cited Axxle because he's the wagon I felt had merit. Your exact statement was"Robz and Axxle wagons are bad". No explanation was given, just "they're bad, now go look somewhere else"... And this is within 72 hours to the deadline. It's intentionally stirring things up late, with no real reason, and it read scummy to me. ((#562, in case you forgot))

Reasons for both given earlier. Through debating you, you don't read my posts then act like I didn't make any and you refuse to acknowledge when you are wrong.

I would need to be wrong to admit it, sorry.

[Axxle]

I wasn't responding to Axxle's accusation of me, I don't see any merit to it I haven't been any more flip floppy or lurky than anyone else here. My post was calling out Axxle for doing some super scummy things recently in his attempt to appear pro-town.

What the heck is this in response to?

[Insomniac]

What is wrong with this game?  We're 2 days to deadline, and we can't even get a candidate to 50% of the votes required to lynch?

Well, we have one candidate past the 50% mark (ehunt, with 5 votes), but you decided you won't vote for him.  :p

That said, the OMGUS discussion re: ehunt brought something else to my eye:  Insomniac's #587 reply to Axxle.  Which is really blatant OMGUS.  Rather than address Axxle's actual argument - that Insom's post history lacks content and shows flip-flopping - Insom instead turned around and attacked (and voted) Axxle for allegedly "starting two wagons."  And I have to agree with Axxle that the ehunt wagon has been driven by others (me included). 

I've been suspicious of Axxle before, but Insom's response feels even scummier to me.  I still like my ehunt vote but I think Insom just became my #2 choice.

This.