Well, that was interesting.
And yuma again repeats what Frisk said a little bit ago, now he's pushing the Robz/Insomniac angle. Frisk and yuma are coming off hugely scummy, maybe they're a scum-pair hoping to act in tandem in such a way that we can never suspect them both because it'd be too obvious? I dunno, but it's pretty ridiculous.
@Frisk's disbelief that 3 town wagons could go at the same time. It's not really that complicated, because town starts town-wagons often enough. One scum joins one wagon, another scum joins another one, and then finally the third scum says "nope, won't join either". Boom, three town-wagons. Let's look at MIV day1 (which is analagous to this games day2): first wagon pops (town), second wagon joth (town), third wagon Axxle (town)...and there was scum on each of them, but town started all of them.
@O: seriously? you think Galz-Robz are scum-buddies? So your story goes like this: Volt accuses Robz and Galz says, "This is exactly how scum-Robz said he'd act...BUS". Then they go to night, and Galz is like, "hey, you lived Imma gonna defend you now by pushing random wagons on other people."
@ehunt:
THEORY DERAILMENT
I'm just uncomfortable killing a claimed PR without proof. I really don't like the idea that night falls and I'm staring at a screen that says "your one-shot cop is dead", because the scum decided to veto Innocent Child. Let's see, here's my view on the PRs:
In my view, the vig is pretty much an IC at this point. If he shoots, we shouldn't lynch, so it's trading one town-directed kill for another. However, as long as he has his shot, no one else can claim vig (since he can safely NK them). However, we know that when the vig claims he'll die that night, so we only get the benefit of the cleared town for one day. Similarly with the IC. But, if both claim at once, we get the benefit of both for one day, and the benefit of one for the second day (since scum can only take out one each day). So, in my view IC and vig should claim the same day. I could be wrong on that, I'd be interested in others' input.
Now, what if someone claims cop? Well, either they're a legit townie, or scum fakeclaiming. IF they're fakeclaiming, we lynch them and hey great, we got the scum. IF they aren't then their investigatee dies at night. And next day we're back to 0 unconfirmed town next day. If vig claims, he dies that night, and well, hopefully we lynched scum that day, otherwise we lost. If we expect an IC to counter-claim, this dire situation can't happen...and if scum decided to leave IC out of the game, we get 3 confirmed town...that's gonna be a pretty good day. So, the bad-side is if the IC is in the game, and has to claim to kill the fake. Well, that's a lot like a cop revealing to take out scum, so it can't be that bad right? But what is it exactly? Let's see: assuming the double-claim above, vig claims as well. We get a confirmed scum-lynch. Next day, we have one confirmed town and one less scum. If that day was today, we'd be at 7 players, 2 scum, 1 confirmed town, and 4 more trying to hit scum, with no PRs. And, well that's not as great as 5 town with 2 hidden power roles, but is it even bad? I feel like the first situation is bad enough that I'm willing to chance this one to avoid it...but that doesn't make it a closed case...it's just how I feel. I'll readily admit to being a pretty conservative player in pretty much all games, so that's certainly playing a role here.
Anyways the topic at hand: Frisk and yuma both acting exactly as I would expect if they're scum. (I already stated this earlier, that I expected them to have derailed town-lynches yesterday into Lekkit-lynch, and then push for them today). I can't pick out one as scum over the other, but regardless of all else, I think we should lynch one of them today.
Author
Topic: Mafia VIII: Pirates of the Pearl Coast - Day 6 Started. PM for QT. (Read 148475 times)