Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: [1] 2  All

Author Topic: By the rules: speaking  (Read 7846 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

blueblimp

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2849
  • Respect: +1559
    • View Profile
By the rules: speaking
« on: July 04, 2012, 08:10:30 pm »
0

In what situations do the rules explicitly allow you to speak out loud? There are multiple right answers.
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
  • Respect: +3391
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2012, 08:12:37 pm »
+1

In what situations do the rules explicitly allow you to speak out loud? There are multiple right answers.

Wishing Well. Contraband.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

blueblimp

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2849
  • Respect: +1559
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2012, 08:31:56 pm »
0

In what situations do the rules explicitly allow you to speak out loud? There are multiple right answers.

Wishing Well. Contraband.

Yep. There are also two situations I know of where you may speak, but are not specific to any particular card.
Logged

ycz6

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 676
  • Respect: +412
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2012, 08:43:03 pm »
+1

When you play any card?
Logged

Young Nick

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 561
  • Respect: +275
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #4 on: July 04, 2012, 08:56:06 pm »
0

Announcing how many VP's you have at the end of the game?

Also, Envoy.
Logged

blueblimp

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2849
  • Respect: +1559
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #5 on: July 04, 2012, 09:00:56 pm »
0

When you play any card?
As I read the rules, it's only required specified to "announce which card [you] are playing" when playing an action card. For treasure cards, the rules seem silent on whether you say anything.
Logged

blueblimp

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2849
  • Respect: +1559
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #6 on: July 04, 2012, 09:07:35 pm »
0

Announcing how many VP's you have at the end of the game?

Also, Envoy.

For VPs, although the rules say to count them, it doesn't explicitly say to do it out loud. (That said, I don't know how else you'd reasonably compare victory point totals.)

Envoy falls into a general bucket of cards with "choose" on them. I'm not sure whether it's explicitly allowed to make this choice out loud, since I don't have the FAQ for Envoy. In the case of Envoy, you could conceivably tap the card with a finger to indicate which card to discard. In the case of a card like Pawn, I don't know how to do it except verbally, but AFAIK the rules don't specify how to do it.
Logged

blueblimp

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2849
  • Respect: +1559
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #7 on: July 04, 2012, 09:09:37 pm »
+2

An additional situation I had in mind:

The rules (slightly ambiguously) either allow or force verbal tracking of the number of remaining actions.

The base rules say:
"If a card gives the player more than one additional Action, he may keep track of the number of Actions he has remaining out loud."

But then later for Village, they say:
"If you're playing multiple Villages, keep a careful count of your Actions. Say how many you have left out loud; this trick works every time."
(Note it doesn't say "may".)


Edit: I actually feel guilty rules-lawyering wording like "this trick works every time", even if just for fun...
« Last Edit: July 04, 2012, 09:22:46 pm by blueblimp »
Logged

Davio

  • 2012 Dutch Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4787
  • Respect: +3413
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #8 on: July 05, 2012, 06:26:08 am »
+2

When an opponent tries to do something illegal like grabbing all the Colonies on turn 1 and announcing: "I've won!"?
Logged

BSG: Cagprezimal Adama
Mage Knight: Arythea

ST218

  • Herbalist
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8
  • Respect: +9
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #9 on: July 05, 2012, 07:13:16 am »
+1

When an opponent tries to do something illegal like grabbing all the Colonies on turn 1 and announcing: "I've won!"?

You don't need to speak for that. Depending on who you're playing with and how well you know them, a punch to the face speaks volumes.

I can think of one instance where speaking is essentially necessary. Torturer; if you have an empty hand and a non-empty curse pile, there's not much of an easy way beyond a minigame of charades (or writing a note but that's cheating) of if you're "choosing to discard two" or simply temporarily deaf and blind and can't parse the Torturer being played a third time.
Logged

Grujah

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2237
  • Respect: +1177
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #10 on: July 05, 2012, 07:32:13 am »
0

Scrying pool, Spy?
As it is your opponent that actually does discarding/putting back, so you need to signal him somehow.


Phil Stone.
Your opponent needs to know the numbers so you don't cheat?

KC-KC-X-X and than, let's say a Bridge, that you only want to play once, and not 3 times (for some silly remake options). If you only put bridge down is it not clear whether it is KCed or not.
« Last Edit: July 05, 2012, 10:16:38 am by Grujah »
Logged

Davio

  • 2012 Dutch Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4787
  • Respect: +3413
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #11 on: July 05, 2012, 08:02:59 am »
0

That KC is a good one, especially with cards that only give a bonus but do not require any further actions to be taken directly.

You may want to play a KC as a single to up your HoP, but not as a tripler as you may accidently stick it to an Outpust.
Logged

BSG: Cagprezimal Adama
Mage Knight: Arythea

Grujah

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2237
  • Respect: +1177
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #12 on: July 05, 2012, 10:23:06 am »
0

That KC is a good one, especially with cards that only give a bonus but do not require any further actions to be taken directly.

You may want to play a KC as a single to up your HoP, but not as a tripler as you may accidently stick it to an Outpust.

Yeah, same with not wanting to stick it with Tactician.
Logged

Kahryl

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 323
  • Respect: +155
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #13 on: July 05, 2012, 10:59:51 am »
0

When you play Hamlet and discard once, you should be required to announce whether you're taking a +action or +buy. Otherwise you might put off the decision till later (after playing more draw cards) to see which you need more.
Logged

blueblimp

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2849
  • Respect: +1559
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #14 on: July 05, 2012, 11:17:36 am »
0

When you play Hamlet and discard once, you should be required to announce whether you're taking a +action or +buy. Otherwise you might put off the decision till later (after playing more draw cards) to see which you need more.
I think that verbal action tracking handles this without any special Hamlet-talk.
Logged

gman314

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 589
  • Respect: +281
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #15 on: July 05, 2012, 11:21:15 am »
+2

But really, if you play any board game face to face with minimal talking, you're missing out on the whole social aspect of playing the game and you might as well go play online.
Logged

Ozle

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3625
  • Sorry, this text is personal.
  • Respect: +3360
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #16 on: July 05, 2012, 11:56:03 am »
+1

Pawn?
Logged
Try the Ozle Google Map Challenge!
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=7466.0

Sullying players Enjoyment of Innovation since 2013 Apparently!

Davio

  • 2012 Dutch Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4787
  • Respect: +3413
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #17 on: July 05, 2012, 01:21:19 pm »
0

That KC is a good one, especially with cards that only give a bonus but do not require any further actions to be taken directly.

You may want to play a KC as a single to up your HoP, but not as a tripler as you may accidently stick it to an Outpust.

Yeah, same with not wanting to stick it with Tactician.
You don't stick it to a Tactician, because you immediately know that you didn't discard any cards the second (or third) time. The Outpost clause only triggers when you want to play your 3rd turn or something funky like that.
Logged

BSG: Cagprezimal Adama
Mage Knight: Arythea

Grujah

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2237
  • Respect: +1177
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #18 on: July 05, 2012, 02:14:08 pm »
0

Well, this is the thing:

Tact:
You discard whole hand. You clean up (KC is cleaned up).
KC'ed Tact:
you discard whole hand. Than you do nothing. Than you do nothing. You clean up (KC is not cleaned up).

No way to differ, and if you played KC-KC-something-something than a Tact, opponent might call that you cannot clean KC as Tact was KCed (that is, it seemed so).


Logged

Young Nick

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 561
  • Respect: +275
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #19 on: July 05, 2012, 02:28:33 pm »
0

Well, this is the thing:

Tact:
You discard whole hand. You clean up (KC is cleaned up).
KC'ed Tact:
you discard whole hand. Than you do nothing. Than you do nothing. You clean up (KC is not cleaned up).

No way to differ, and if you played KC-KC-something-something than a Tact, opponent might call that you cannot clean KC as Tact was KCed (that is, it seemed so).

I'm pretty sure the KC is cleaned up regardless. DXV has clarified about this before, and it does get quite confusing for durations that are TR'ed and KC'ed in general, but because the KC is not modifying, and thus gives no new information, it is allowed to be cleaned up.
Logged

Grujah

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2237
  • Respect: +1177
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #20 on: July 05, 2012, 02:31:31 pm »
0

Iso handles it differently that what you said. Just checked.
Logged

jider

  • Swindler
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15
  • Respect: +7
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #21 on: July 05, 2012, 04:01:04 pm »
0

I suppose you could use hand gestures, but I like to let my opponent know verbally if they need to discard for minion or if I am taking the $2.  Additionally, when being tortured, I like to announce what I am doing and not just discard or pick up a curse in silence.  And as common courtesy, I announce every Council Room I play so certain forgetful friends of mine are reminded to draw an extra card (same goes with Governor).
Logged

Vaivraza

  • Herbalist
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9
  • Respect: +6
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #22 on: August 09, 2012, 10:23:59 pm »
0

I understand we are discussing this because we must be forced to play Dominion in the Library, or at classroom, in wich case we must avoid to speak as much as possible.
Logged

razorborne

  • Bishop
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 100
  • Respect: +8
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #23 on: August 10, 2012, 01:57:09 pm »
0

I didn't see any mention of Philosopher's Stone but I'm pretty sure you need to convey the value somehow.
Logged

Grujah

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2237
  • Respect: +1177
    • View Profile
Re: By the rules: speaking
« Reply #24 on: August 10, 2012, 03:53:05 pm »
0

I didn't see any mention of Philosopher's Stone but I'm pretty sure you need to convey the value somehow.

Just silently count them really slow so everyone can catch.
If somebody raises an issue, give them your deck and discard to do it themselves.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All
 

Page created in 0.105 seconds with 21 queries.