You were playing to the scum wincon. You don't even understand how I could get that idea?
As has so often happened this game, I saw the scumminess of my own logic as soon as it was too late to do anything about it. Aw well. This is how we learn. I should explain the logic behind my post better.
This town was dead while we waited for Galz. Like totally dead. If conversation grinds to a halt in the absence of a particular player, I'm inclined to think of removing that player as bad for the town. That's why I was hesitant to cast a pops vote, thereby ratcheting up the pops vs. Galz situation.
To be fair, there was an expectation of a whopping analysis which was promised and then didn't materialize, nobody wanted to proceed forward with other lynching until we saw the promised details. The dead weekend doesn't really surprise me, because weekends are hard, father's day more so.
So it looks like we're primarily talking about 4 candaites:
Too Big To Fail BunchGalz: suspicion seems to have died down. Still eligible for a policy lynch based on "Lynch all Liars"
Pops: Galz makes some reasonable points. I also went and skimmed through some of pops' stuff on mafia scum, and he's just as much of a pain in the [waste removal hole] over there, so I'm coming around to the viewpoint of "that's just the way the game is played" He even uses his goofy slang as well - which I didn't see when browsing his normal
topics over here on f.ds.
The wundertwinsGlooble - I am still skeptical that it would be anything resembling mafia play to twinclaim as Glooble if Glooble is Mafia and J is town
J - I feel that he's the safer pick between these two, but the ease in which we are gaining votes on them makes me fear that mafia is involved. Robz's points of "let me vote for everyone but me" on him does resonate with me.
If we assume 3 mafia, that leaves 9 non mafia. 7 out of 9 need to get together to lynch, which is going to be hard.
@O - welcome back, where have you been all my life?