So here's the thing -- Assuming that TINAS, WoG and Robz all approve the mission, I am now the swing vote. And I want to vote for this team. I started writing up a big post rationalizing why I should vote yes for this team. But the further I got with it, the less certain I was, and now I think I'm going to vote no.
I still find TINAS most trustworthy (despite Galzria's contention, though it is noted and it puts me just a little on edge) and Morgrim the least. Everyone else is hovering around neutral... Robz is a few points up because of Morgrim's no vote to my team proposal, and same for WoG (though Morgrim's second "no" vote carries less weight because it could be for the sake of consistency).
I'm torn on Galzria. I have a Resistance read on him, but I can't pinpoint any particular tells that make me think that. The problem is that I have a similar, stronger read on TINAS. The conflict between them is tricky. High level spy technique so that, when one is outed, the other has immense trust? Two Resistance members with bad reads on each other? Or (most likely, I think) one of the two actually is a spy. But in that case, I trust TINAS more than Galz right now.
All this is too say that, if I exclude myself, this team of 3 is what I'd pick as well. But excluding myself is really bad. I want to rationalize it away, but I can't get around it. But if I reject this team, I have no idea who WoG will nominate, or Morgrim if we get to that point. Those prospects might be worse.
So is there any other strategic consideration that should push my vote one way or another? If the team goes through and the mission passes, hurrah, but if it fails, maybe it's worth it to know that there is a spy among the people I'd felt most positive about. I'd really appreciate insights from everyone on this.
Unless someone makes a case for why I should push it through, I think I'm going to vote no.