So I'm not sure if people have reads on anyone yet. I know that TINAS and Galzria were rather antagonistic earlier, though it's understandable on both sides.
For my part, TINAS has looked least scummy (to borrow Mafia terms) so far. Galzria and Morgrim have both been a little off, but only a little. Galzria because of "if we get to mission 5 I won't veto and prove myself RO" (and I know it was just a passing comment, not a full out suggestion -- not gonna twist that
) and Morgrim because of his many "yes" votes. I was mostly neutral on WoG and Robz.
I proposed TINAS and Robz hoping to see something interesting from the votes re: Robz. I included TINAS because of my RO read on him. Didn't want to pick Morgrim because I expected him to say yes either way. I was inclined to exclude Galzria as well just because he it would be too easy to vote yes for it (given that we were both on the mission 1 success). Then, it was just a toss up between Robz and WoG.
And I got more than I thought I would.
Suspicion on Galzria is *slightly* up now, because of this post:
Generally, I should vote No, if it doesn't include me, and contains someone I believe might be a spy, correct? But I'll never have leader this round, so if I vote yes and we lose, it gives us valuable information (eHalcyon could be spy, hiding first mission, or one of TINAS/Robz is - or a combination thereof).
What's the better move for me here? I would rather go up 2-0, so wait and hope to hit a pairing of my liking, but going 1-1 doesn't seen like the end of the world for us either. I'm so confused. 
I'm leaning towards no, but am not sure.
Galzria, IMO, I don't see any reason why you should have voted yes. Indeed, if the mission goes through and it gets red-carded, you do get information. But as we said earlier (I think?) this holds true whether you accept the first mission or the fifth mission. In the meanwhile, holding off on missions gets us MORE data.
But that's not all. Earlier on you very rather against TINAS, so why wouldn't that continue into today? If you meant what you said, it would make a lot of sense to vote AGAINST this mission, just to keep TINAS off the team.
All that said, I can imagine a few reasonable explanations for your questions, which is why I think it only makes you a bit more suspicious. I really want to see your response.
MUCH more interesting thing that happened -- Morgrim votes NO for the first time and says that he wants to be on the team. This is a strange change from his mission 1 vote pattern. What happened? I see two major possible explanations. The first is that our arguments during the first mission (or maybe just Opinion Maker) convinced him to vote with greater care. The second explanation... Morgrim could be a spy.
On the first day, Spy Morgrim doesn't really care who goes on the mission. He votes yes to everything. If the team passes, great -- less information available to the rest of us. Otherwise, it doesn't really make a difference to him.
But now, the Resistance is up by 1. It would majorly suck for the Spies to be down 2-0. For all he knows, TINAS and I were going to approve the team since we were included (and Robz had already publicly voiced his intent to approve). If he voted yes as well, the team would go through with at least 4/6 approving. If there are no spies on that team, well, the safe thing to do is to vote NO and hope the team that is eventually approved has at least one Spy on it.
Therefore I am inclined to trust both TINAS and Robz a little more.
Morgrim, any comments on this?
Author
Topic: Resistance: The Empire Must Fall (Read 31327 times)