I think shraeye has been accused of "acti-lurking"? I think that is a kind of vacuous statement. shraeye has been playing pretty close to the chest, but it's clear that he has opinions. Yes, some posts are just jokes, but I can't fault anyone for having fun. Maybe I'm biased because I really enjoy pretty much all of shraeye's posts.
What opinions are you referring to?
I've collated everything from shraeye's 23 Day 1 posts that could possibly be considered an opinion. (They're copy-pasted and some of them modified for clarity. * means it came after shraeye was called out.)
JokesWords are important. Gotta find the best words.
Like this. We all know Jimmmm is fluffy. Famously fluffy in fact. Perfect word, thanks Jimmmm.
drunk mafia is best mafia.
This is basically mafia in a nutshell. Back up feelings with analysis, lean heavy into the confirmation bias on those times I have miraculously been right. *
EtiquetteDid you just underline "absurd" from his post? (implying it shouldn't be done)
I am not supposed to do the strong underlining jimm
Theory/MetaWho is the #1 most/least content-full player right now? (implies it matters in theory; potentially implies that it was relevant to the game at that point)
I do not recall PRs going silently down with the ship ever. If you're argument is that they should, then I possibly agree but it's irrelevant
I see no downsides from swinging momentum from [fang] to [Robz] , especially when [fang] has likely been considered by all players and [Robz] is relatively less-spotlighted thus far. *
Self-analysis/defenseBut cagey was not as perfect for for shraeye.
Flippant. Mostly stubborn (trying to improve this), and only accidentally helpful (no plans to change).
I mean, I'm biased. But I still totally disagree with this ("acti-lurker") take. *
NeutralIt is, unfortunately, perfectly Swowl-neutral in my mind
It is, unfortunately, perfectly faust-neutral in my mind
Opinions on words/actions taken by playersI don't consider mcmc to be the most active player, lots of back and forth that gets his post-count up sure...but that's not "active" in my book.
the conclusion you are really giving is "I know I called this out initially and brought extra attention to it, but it's a dangerous topic to discuss so nobody should say anything"??!!
Unexplained readsI'm willing to give up my fourth-from-top scum read... It's scolapasta. (maybe belongs under "jokes")
Vote: mcmc Because of the thing
I'm still down for mcmc. Still because of the thing. *
Reads with something vaguely approaching an explanationDidds is too middle of the road for me to move from mcmc. Although I am liking her breakdown of scola...could move there *
So if we filter down to non-neutral opinions about this game and the other players in it, we get:
scola is the 4th scummyest player
mcmc's post count is boosted
mcmc was a bit hypocritical
mcmc is scummy
Didds is middle of the road
Didds lurker case on scola was good
Which of these opinions are helpful?