Galz, why the Swowl vote?
Unexplained vote on Awaclus, which you will see as I list all of his points he's never brought back up again (or changed):
yoyo - Happy New Year!
set up talk in a game where you are explicitly told the mod "may not be able to be trusted" seems pointless. and I fucking love set up talk.
Vote: Awaclus
Nothing Post, not scum hunting in any meaningful way:
yoyo - Happy New Year!
set up talk in a game where you are explicitly told the mod "may not be able to be trusted" seems pointless. and I fucking love set up talk.
Vote: Awaclus
Why not just vote for joth then?
... what?
Answering for EFHW, not scum hunting in any meaningful way:
Slow starting game. Then again, we're just 9, but gkrieg hasn't showed up yet.
This is a bastard game. You can trust what the mod tells you to a point. But some things I say may not be entirely true. Or not true in the way you think they are.
Does this include role pms? What about win conditions?
Just thought about something: why didn't you just ask this in your QT?
its a BM with no set up info. no one that is town should be asking public info questions in their QT and not in the public thread.
The first (and only) post that might be considered scum hunting, but really it's just the start of his series of deflections from Scola - with no seeming goal of actually deciphering the alignment of either EFHW or MiX.
EFHW - what you find skummy about that?
Like also mix what do you find skummy about the response he had?
Could they of responded in a way that was not going to be skummy? Or was it just the fact that they responded?
Nothing Post - No scum hunting in any meaningful way:
I was going to vote MiX here, but I’m going to leave my vote on Scola for right now. I would also consider Datswan or Gkrieg at this point in time.
I’m like… 99% sure DatSwan is not in this game
And this is why I say his post asking EFHW & MiX about Scola wasn't actually scum hunting - because EFHW's response was met with the below, where there's no train of thought about how EFHW's response might say something about her alignment - instead, he's simply debating why he thinks she shouldn't find Scola scummy:
EFHW - what you find skummy about that?
Like also mix what do you find skummy about the response he had?
Could they of responded in a way that was not going to be skummy? Or was it just the fact that they responded?
It has the ring of a classic scum post - making generalizations about how they play and how town and scum play. Safe stuff, no commitments.
I'd vote him, but I don't want to put him at E-1 so early in the day.
do you disagree with anything he said?
he was answering a question right? all of it seems to check out to me.
There is no definitive answer, it is open ended, so I don't see not having commitments here skummy. Nor towny.
These were the 6 posts he's made, in total, prior to my vote. I feel like Swowl is actively posting, so that he cannot be called a lurker, but I don't feel like Swowl is actively engaged in finding scum.
His deflection from Scola makes Scola a slightly worse exile between the two - because scum!Swowl is more likely to do that to town!Scola than scum!Scola. And in the consideration of town!Swowl - Why would town!Swowl spend his time deflecting from unknown!Scola, while also spending no time at all scum hunting? Again... his vote is still currently on Awaclus from his first post of the day.
Ultimately, I feel like Swowl is posting to stay active, but is actively NOT scum hunting, which doesn't feel like town!Swowl.
Author
Topic: BM 34: Groundhog's Day Mafia -- GAME OVER, mafia wins flawlessly (Read 42919 times)