If you play altar and your hand is empty you still gain a $5-cost card, and you increase your deck size
That's a fair point and I forgot about that detail.
How can Remodel be not OK and Remodelers like Stonemason and Develop be OK? That is totally inconsistent.
You can either restrict this to pure gainers or be fine with all Remodelers. The criterium of handsize increase is pretty weird and arbitrary as Freddy has pointed out.
Well, I did say they were borderline for a reason. To me what differentiated Stonemason and Develop from pure Remodelers (when Fortress isn't around) is that you have a net gain. I don't want to be fine with all Remodelers because that's not what I wanted the contest to be about.
The original Feast doesn't net increase your deck size.
A more clear rule would be that being able to gain a $5 shouldn't depend on the cost of the trashed card (so Altar counts but Develop and Stonemason don't)
Normally no, but the exception would be with throne room variants, Command cards, or Necromancer.
I think rather than overengineering the rules, I'm just going to treat them like guidelines rather than rules. Basically, give me a cool $5-cost gainer that isn't purely a Remodel variant. I will be flexible, and won't be disqualifying entries unless they completely stray from the
rules guidelines.
- It should be able to gain a $5-cost card without any cost reduction (the exception would be if the cost reduction is already provided by your submission)
Would Inventor count?
Uhh...not quite what I had in mind (I was thinking of something like Inventor where the cost reduction came before the gaining).