I've been going through Galz's ISO wall-post and his VCA from the end of D4. I realise Didds has also been doing the same thing, and may already have posted some of these points, but I've been grouping my observations by which hypothesis they support, so I hope you don't mind if I post all the items in my own format.
Factors in favour of scum!Didds/town!Chairs, from Galz's ISOing:
a. WCD is more likely than most others to push for a MiX exile N1.
b. WCD has opinions on all players at #97, rather than skipping anyone. I find this a real stretch as "scum" evidence goes, because I also always feel the pressure to be inclusive in these things, especially as town.
c. WCD's #691/#692 suggests me or Eevee for scum, whereas before, she pointed at ADK and chairs. Actually, given that she was specifically reeling off the names at the end of the Glooble Mixile, I'm not that surprised, and don't see this as the big turnaround that Galz characterizes it as at all.
d. Galz says that Didds is trying very hard to seem like she's been pushing Eevee while allegedly not being committed. Looking at my vote count history, she pushed EFHW more than anyone else, but did spend just over 100 posts of D3 on the Eevee wagon before switching to the Chairs wagon (which at that point contained Eevee and Glooble).
Factors in favour of scum!Chairs/town!Didds, from Galz's case:
a. Eevee's post at #101 calling Didds townie.
b. Eevee's reads post at #201 is more "middle ground" on Chairs and faust, so Galz concludes there's likely to be a scum there rather than in ADK.
c1. Eevee only voting Chairs then Chairs wasn't much of a going concern, as noted in Galz's read commenting on post #398.
c2. Commenting on the same post, Galz says he thinks his "WCD needle" is reading "slightly townier again".
d. In the "WCD" reads section, Galz points out that WCD asked the same question about Joseph that Eevee had just asked, which isn't something scum-who-have-daychat would probably aim to do.
e. In Galz's Chairs re-read, Galz comments on how spread-out Chairs's voting is, and how his overall behaviour is like he has a quota to fill.
f. Galz specifically says that there's more evidence on Chairs for scumminess in the VCA, whereas all the evidence for Didds is in her posts (which I think aren't nearly as scummy as Galz makes out).
Other comments on Galz's mega-post:
a. Galz's comment on #549 his WCD re-read starts "If we assume Eevee and WCD are partners...", which is a biased starting point given that he hasn't given much evidence at all that it's really valid to scumread her.
b. Galz mentioned that "WCD has a LOT of scum points against her", but I feel like several of his points are very weak compared specifically to the scum!chairs points.
c. Galz's read on ADK is extremely hedgey, which is fine for town who just doesn't know how to form a good opinion, but is at odds with the way he picks up a bunch of minor points of WCD and makes them into a scum-case. It's very consistent with a scum player who knows town is about to exile a townie and wants to gain extra credibility for his "reads".
And onto Galz's VCA at #833, which is after the ADK hammer:
Factors in favour of scum!Didds/town!Chairs, from Galz's case:
a. WCD was the only unflipped person (from Galz's perspective in which he can count himself green) not on the Glooble wagon at #645.
-- this would be weakish reasoning even if it didn't totally ignore the fact that none of the rest of us have a solid read on Galz.
Factors in favour of scum!Chairs/town!Didds, from Galz's case:
a. The quick and opportunistic way that Chairs follows Robz and EFHW onto WCD at #308.
b. Galz says that Chairs's move from Joseph (whose wagon also contained Eevee) to ADK (wagon with only EFHW) at #404 didn't look good.
-- I don't think it looks like much of anything, except possibly if Galz is scum, in which case it makes sense not to want all three scum to end up on Joseph.
-- Not sure why Galz is using this as a point against Chairs.
Other comments on Galz's VCA post:
a. He concludes by saying that WCD is by far the scummiest, whereas my re-read of his ISO reads of Didds, Chairs and Eevee doesn't count up nearly as many scum!Didds points from Galz as scum!Chairs points.
b. The "ideal scum voting spread" that Galz attributes to WCD is mainly predicated around the fact that Galz colours himself green. This thing that Galz presents as a big case against WCD should essentially mean nothing to the rest of us for whom Galz is still an unknown entity.
c. An Eevee-Galz-Chairs scumteam has one point in the game where all three were on the same player (Joseph) D1, but Chairs was last to join and first to leave, which is entirely consistent with someone caring about VCA and suggesting in day-chat that he might want to move again.
Lastly, factors in favour of scum!Didds/town!Chairs, from me:
a. Eevee votes Chairs for quite a while in the middle of D2, including when Chairs is the biggest wagon (early in the day, at 3 votes). However, this isn't super-strong evidence, because meanwhile Didds is on an Eevee wagon, so scum is bussing here either way around.
And factors in favour of scum!Chairs/town!Didds, from me:
a. Eevee's move onto the Glooble wagon at the end of D2 locked us into a Glooble exile when Chairs was the next-most-likely wagon.
-- Eevee had previously been on the Chairs wagon when it looked small and harmless.
b. Chairs's quick-hammer of ADK was really unnecessary. Meanwhile, Didds was evidently online and posting at around that time, but did not choose to join the IC-approved mixile wagon.