Reasons: Mix was so confident about 3 targets, but didn't hammer. Turns out all three are town* (if we believe chairs' claim). This just work too well into scum!mix trying to pass off as town!mix.
Oh no I didn't hammer the PR, I must be scum. What is with this logic? Can no one accept that I don't like hammering? Is this just impossible to understand? I'm reading EoD1, and this is brought up against now. Seriously scola, think about it.
It's this kind of statement ^^ "I didn't hammer the PR" that worries me. Of course town wouldn't choose to hammer a PR. But we didn't know that at the time, so phrasing like this just feels so "leading the witness". EOD1 chairs was a decent case (which you supported) and if anything, a VT because they didn't claim when they had the chance.
In fact, thinking about it, that would be a perfect (and more plausible than "I'm afraid to hammer one of my top three suspects) reason for scum!Mix not to hammer there, no? Wouldn't scum rather hammer a PR than a VT?
I wasn't around between his lack of claim and Robz's unvote. Your timeline is unfounded.
Ok, sigh, you're making me go look at the tapes:
You posted at (forum times):
14:26, 14:39, 14:45, 14:49, 15:17, 15:29
chairs posts at 16:05
Robz unvotes at 16:33
So, yeah, you could've easily have gone to bed...
EXCEPT, you then posted again at 16:58, 17:01, 17:03, 17:05, 17:08, you get the picture.
It's as if you chose to conveniently be away when you could've hammered.
Look, I'm not saying this is a slam dunk, but it's a better vote than what else is out there.