I'm not sure if shraeye's case is towny or not...some things are dead on while others are clearly misinterpreting what I've said:
So here is why my vote went onto MiX. Two reasons, both small.
First; calling out some people but not others.
I completely missed Uncleeurope...odd, maybe it's because I've actually seen him play.
I like wagons too, just not the current ones, those guys are my top townreads!
...I STILL want something from shraeye, his wife already talked, why can't he?
At this point Dylan had not posted. The fact that he wants input from others so emphatically (but not from all) is incongruous.
I wasn't on dylan but I was on shraeye, so I wanted him to talk, so I could move my vote elsewhere...in retrospect, I should've asked both, given that I simply swapped to dylan...but at the moment that was my reasoning.
Second; he is very worried about votes on him while claiming not to be
To be honest, I disregard the first vote on me, especially one right from the start of the game.
Here he scumreads someone for voting on him. Devil-may-care + OMGUS = more incongruous.
Oh, thank you LaLight, was that for me? Regardless, FoS: LaLight, seems opportunist, maybe it's just the OMGUS talking, but still.
Note how I said the FIRST vote, not all; everyone should be worried about their votes, if everyone thinks I'm scummy, I need to fight back somehow.
LaLight's vote for me came unexplained and it felt like an attempt at joining a wagon for virtually no reason...seemed like the kind of low effort posts scum would do, but on the other hand it felt TOO scummy to be made by scum...so I just said "FoS" and went on my way. Then LaLight said that he "loved" ari, and that explained the vote more (sheeping my townread is acceptable), so I backed off.
Now my reactions to your vote...at first I was thinking you would explain the vote sooner, so I asked for said explanation. Then, seeing that faust voted for me without saying anything new, I came to the (at the time) only logical conclusion: the purpose of your vote was for pressure. You had a reason behind the vote, whatever it was, but the motive was clear, so I backed off: if you don't want to say what it is, who am I to push it?
Now, knowing the meaning, I approached it as a normal case, the case being whatever the initial reason was, which for me meant a minor slip (like me buddying or maybe just the way I worded things, I didn't know what, but I knew that town!shraeye and scum!shraeye would have some backing to that vote), so I mentioned it when stating cases on me; didn't want to leave out any information, that would just be scummy for no reason, more info is good.
Then raerae said there's no reason: well, there's just no way shraeye would do that play without a reason, so I told her to look closer; by doing so, she would come to the same conclusion that I did: the motive was pressure (note how I said the "meaningfulness" exists if you look closer, not the reason; after all, you could only guess at it, and raerae already stated she did not want to).
Then, after raerae continued to push me on why I thought shraeye's case existed in the first place, I said what I'm saying now: I did something that he thought was scummy and he voted me based on those reasons; at that point, some time had passed and shraeye hadn't said what the scummy thing was, so I asked for it: whatever it was must've been good enough to vote, but was it enough to maintain it? I was also on the process of destroying my early wagon, and that vote was part of it.
And there you have it, that is all I have to say about shraeye's case, as for shraeye himself...I feel like too many people are finding me scummy for this case to be scummy, there was some effort so I'll consider it null for now.
PPE all the way since faust's awakening, including my posts.
Author
Topic: M121: Philosophers Mafia Mafia (Game Over, Perfect Mafia Victory!) (Read 297048 times)