IDP re-read... I'm getting so sleepy I'm almost nodding off at my laptop and it's well after 2am, so I'm going to have to call it a night now :-(
Early on is a bunch of engagement with Awaclus, which is a good way to keep a post count up and get pretty much nowhere.
Calls me scummy, not very long after having said that something else I'd said was NAI, in response to Robz's case.
Is #416 the thing where he later says he thought he'd found a scum-slip but then it wasn't?
Agrees with me over Jimmmm, then votes me not very long after over LL.
Jumps onto my mcmc case (the wagon was already building, but he was specifically agreeing with me) at #582. Obviously my case was wrong, but was expect some scums to want to play along with it.
Third place on the D3 Eevee wagon, saying "It be hilarious if Eevee is town. Just saying." There are worlds in which that could be defined as a forced-sounding statement.
#861 "How did Awaclus become an IC?" Non-partner tell, I think, though not so relevant while Awaclus is considered sort-of-IC.
I sympathise with the desire not to fullclaim. The fact he's the only person worrying openly about scum having their pick of PRs is a bit worrying for the rest of us, really!
His later D4 argument with iguana looks like he's reading into things badly: Iguana points out that IDP comments on one claim but not another, then IDP asks where he said he wasn't commenting on the other, which is not how "not commenting" works.. I can see why that might rub Iguana up the worng way.
I certainly agree that a POE argument with so little sure evidence out there is not a strong one to make. Iguana has already gone wrong on that once this game with gkrieg.
Not sure what to make of his lack of thinking through the "two people protecting each other" thing from the side where one of them might be scum. I could clearly see what iguana was saying, because I'd gone through similar thought processes myself as a town trying to think it through, so perhaps it's a sign that IDP wasn't going through the same process. I think it's moderatley weak evidence, though.
His point at #1099 about ascetic blocking reflexive cops is solid.
My conclusion is still that I'm in two minds about him. I can certainly see stuff there that could easily fit with a scummy motivation, but I don't think it's clear at all, and I'm not fond of using POE so much as a lynch case.