Some things for people to disagree with me on, given that this is going to have to be a readsy game:
Robz888: 3 game posts so far, mostly VLA. I agree with him not awarding any kind of townpoints to Joseph. He needs to be more present, and has said he'll have more time starting tomorrow, so let's defer judgement till then.
Joseph2302: Has just been AWOL for a number of days on the back of a posted VLA. Opened with his usual silly SK stunt, followed by an even less helpful suggestion of massclaim. He feels even more than usual like he's acting like he expects people to want him to act, with no sensible level of engagement or thought underneath. That's not alignment-indicative, and people trying to weave town/scum narratives around if for cred or easy mislynches are people we should keep an eye on.
schadd: I'm impressed that his vote at #38 didn't cause me more of a headache for the auto-vote-counter once I got it set up for this game. Seems to be the more def!town side of the schadd-WW argument in my reading of it, but I do think they could easily both be town.
Space: Spaaaaaace :-)
TheWineMerchant: In tone, he feels a smidge grumpier than his average, but maybe that's just me having found a thing to disagree with. Most of what he says is actually really sensible. But I feel the need to keep a careful eye on him anyway.
Theorel: I really disagree with the townpoints-to-Joseph thing early on, but his later posts seem pretty sensible and echo some of my thought processes.
Galzria: Really low on content. Only five game posts, and two of them were quoting schadd's "I agree with you that I am town" statement: once at #78, and then again at #141. The only other thing he's contributed was support for mcmc about not giving town points to Joseph. While I understand other people's frustration with too much being read into Joseph's undirected behaviour, I think Galz was too curt, and almost aggressive sounding in his demand that other people don't ask for mcmc to back up his statement. We want town players to be able to offer watertight arguments.. I'm really not sure where Galz was coming from there.
DatSwan: Is he less verbose than usual? His posting rate has tailed off over the past few days, so I think he's one of the people contributing to the lull that seems to be happening. He's incorrect about the "do the derp hammer math" thing: I really did just judge it to be too early in the game to be worth being particularly concerned, and I wanted to get a vote down before distracting myself with setting up the vote counter for the game (which took something like 10 mins, but had it taken longer there was a risk I'd just have forgotten to vote). Also, it's "maths" for me, never "math".
Awaclus: The non-violent-looking avatar is weird to me. He's made only one game post so far. In fact, Request prod on Awaclus too.. I only searched for people who'd been gone over 48 hours before, and right now, he's almost up to 48 already anyway.
mcmcsalot: Is he kind of VLA just now? I believe he's been in the same VLA as Robz. I think his comment was worth the slew of votes it drew. Well, TWM was there before. It's going to be an interesting wagon to look back on later in the game, I guess, if we even get any usable flips.
Witherweaver: Could easily be TvT with the schadd stuff. OTOH, his may be the scummiest of the mcmc wagon votes, given that he was pushing at schadd a fair amount without apparently feeling compelled to vote at that point. At least he's decently active!
pingpongsam: Only four game posts, one of which is an SK joke and the other three of which push along his really-poorly-explained attempt to get a wagon going on theorel, which none fo us seem to be feeling. @PPS: care to put forward a bit more of a case there?
Author
Topic: M114: Wheel of Time II - Game Over! Town Wins! (Read 69185 times)