Okay people voting for me in the last little while (Robz didn't feel comfortable leaving me at L-1, I guess)
Robz: His wagon-hopping is severe. I think he's been on and off of me twice already. But he reads to me as confused town rather than scum. Also, scum seldom push lurker lynches, they'd rather kill active town if possible. Also also, I've definitely tried to be more provocative this game, and I can see how Robz might read that as being "off" (long posts with excessive reasoning, though? that's on-meta for me).
The_Wine_Merchant: confused defense of RoadRunner, with a vote that says it could come off if I don't know rr's meta. This reads scummy to me...he's been severely inactive, and let's face it this game is not hard to keep up with. But if he had daychat with someone talkative...I could see him being scum easily.
Roadrunner: I still think his vote on me was scummy, really more for timing than anything else, although the lack of argument is not doing him favors. He's also the one who suggested silver's mime-gambit must be mime-or-scum, which I completely disagree with.
silverspawn: I still think the mime-gambit was townie...I'm surprised that he's voting for me for caution, I've definitely been less cautious this game than normal. I mean, in what world was voting for silver because of an expressed town-read "cautious"?
Awaclus: I don't even know how I know that Awaclus is inscrutable, but yeah...I'm gonna cautiously say town-read here.
Joseph: His reaction is exactly the reaction I would expect from town for my terrible silver-vote. Which probably means that vote was bad play, but yeah towniest player on my wagon.
Bonus Reads:
Datswan reads a bit scummy for harping on silver. Biased of course by my town-read on silver.
Lekkit is super-lurker extraordinaire. I'm going to
vote: Lekkit since that seems like my best hope of surviving.
But at least if I die you now have my reads to ignore for the rest of the game