Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Witherweaver]

I think that's L-1.

Unvote

because I don't want Ash to end the day.

[Archetype]

Vote Count 2.3

gkrieg13 (1): LaLight
ashersky (1): gkrieg13
Roadrunner7671 (1): Puk
Puk (4): ashersky, iguanaiguana, Roadrunner7671, JaketheBaseballGod22

Not Voting (5): silverspawn, pingpongsam, Eevee, Teproc, Witherweaver

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. Day 2 will end on October 16th at 7:30 PM

[Witherweaver]

Oh. It was Ash that started.

Didn't PPS vote Puk though?

[pingpongsam]

Oh. It was Ash that started.

Didn't PPS vote Puk though?

I even made an argument to you that throwing votes around today was irresponsible.

[iguanaiguana]

Interesting.

Vote: WW

WAGONS PEOPLE LET'S GO

[LaLight]

vote: WW

I don't like Puk wagon

[ashersky]

vote: WW

I don't like Puk wagon

Why were you voting gkrieg?

[LaLight]

vote: WW

I don't like Puk wagon

Why were you voting gkrieg?

vote: gkrieg13

?

Trying to grab a towncred for lynching scum who as well may not be in your team, trying to open wagon on me and the question if I know for sure or base on flavor seemed insincere

[Puk]

I predict that Puk will find this wagon kinda lame.

true

[Witherweaver]

Oh. It was Ash that started.

Didn't PPS vote Puk though?

I even made an argument to you that throwing votes around today was irresponsible.

Oh, it was Iguana.  Who has now scummily changed his.

[iguanaiguana]

Oh. It was Ash that started.

Didn't PPS vote Puk though?

I even made an argument to you that throwing votes around today was irresponsible.

Oh, it was Iguana.  Who has now scummily changed his.

You the scum

[iguanaiguana]

Seriously though. WW can motivate a bunch of people to vote for others (schadd, Puk) simply by calling them to a generalized sense of "action in mafia is important." HOWEVER, getting others to vote for him based on the same appeal yields none of the same results. The people who voted both Puk and schadd won't vote WW, except me.

If we are expecting a scum faction with extra vote shenanigans, then I can very easily see a narrative for WW wanting people to be voting more than they are as scum.

This is a good place for votes people. Prove to me you are not his partner! Put your money where your mouth is!

I didn't bother to check if all my evidence is true, but it feels true. So I like it. Let's do this.

[ashersky]

vote: WW

I don't like Puk wagon

Why were you voting gkrieg?

vote: gkrieg13

?

Trying to grab a towncred for lynching scum who as well may not be in your team, trying to open wagon on me and the question if I know for sure or base on flavor seemed insincere

And why did you stop?

[LaLight]

vote: WW

I don't like Puk wagon

Why were you voting gkrieg?

vote: gkrieg13

?

Trying to grab a towncred for lynching scum who as well may not be in your team, trying to open wagon on me and the question if I know for sure or base on flavor seemed insincere

And why did you stop?

This was strong enough case for D1, noe=w I see a stronger case and have stronger feelings towards WW being scum. gkrieg is not off the table completely. Why? Is he your scumpartner?

[Roadrunner7671]

I like where Iguana's coming from and I think his thought process has some merit, but I also decided overnight that I don't like playing where we get people to L-1 because of mediocre evidence so I'm just gonna Unvote

[iguanaiguana]

Okay, the actual data.

Peak Puk wagon: ashersky, WW, iguanaiguana, Roadrunner7671, JaketheBaseballGod22

schadd wagon: gkrieg13, iguanaiguana, Witherweaver, Roadrunner7671, silverspawn, pingpongsam, ashersky

Same people on both: ash, WW, iguana, RR,

Ash is L-1 on schadd and unknowing starter of Puk. PPS is on schadd and won't get on Puk. Gkrieg & silver were on schadd and haven't commented on Puk. Jake is on Puk but wasn't on schadd. Roadrunner, WW, and I are on both and know we are hopping on wagons.

As for me, I like wagons, Puk seems like he could be scum, and I want the data of what will people do with it across 24 hours.

I didn't like how it seemed like the same people are voting for both because of the hidden vote potential. But now it seems it's not as homogenous as a I thought.  I do think PPS reads towny for not joining the second time.

I still think WW is a better shot for scum than Puk. I'll stick with it.

[iguanaiguana]

I predict that Puk will find this wagon kinda lame.

true

Dude who is the scums do you think? you gotta tell us.

[iguanaiguana]

Does anyone think Jake could be scummy for confirming LL's claim?

[iguanaiguana]

Can we talk about that?

[LaLight]

Does anyone think Jake could be scummy for confirming LL's claim?

I don't think

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

Does anyone think Jake could be scummy for confirming LL's claim?

no

[LaLight]

actually I think that Jake is now 90% confirmed town to me

[iguanaiguana]

actually I think that Jake is now 90% confirmed town to me

Okay. I don't really want to say more today then I guess.

[Witherweaver]

Seriously though. WW can motivate a bunch of people to vote for others (schadd, Puk) simply by calling them to a generalized sense of "action in mafia is important." HOWEVER, getting others to vote for him based on the same appeal yields none of the same results. The people who voted both Puk and schadd won't vote WW, except me.

If we are expecting a scum faction with extra vote shenanigans, then I can very easily see a narrative for WW wanting people to be voting more than they are as scum.

This is a good place for votes people. Prove to me you are not his partner! Put your money where your mouth is!

I didn't bother to check if all my evidence is true, but it feels true. So I like it. Let's do this.

Now this, is a terrible case.

[Teproc]

It is. I think iguana is townie for making it (see also: why gkrieg is townie), but scum totally sheeps it.

vote: LaLight