I'm like actually pretty sure that ash is scum.
Really ? Just based on the L-1 thing ?
And his reaction to it. The defense was definitely a scummy one.
How so ?
Perfectly valid in every game that has a scum dayvig power via QT order. Voting comes up slightly more often.
Gkrieg is calling the L-1 scummy based on information we have in hindsight. That’s disingenuous given I had no reason to think the L-1 would result in anything other than some discussion and unvotes. Which, by the way, was my expectation and reasoning. I had no reason to suspect schadd of anything. The voters and non voters were more interesting.
I mean, if the discussion is “would ashersky place an L-1 vote that results in a quick hammer as scum” then the answer is of course yes. But so would everyone. It’s just as valid to argue that hidden double voter gkrieg started a wagon hoping it would run up to L-1 and surprise lynch, or that faust hidden voted when he stated intent to hammer, etc.
I’m getting good reads so far today, though, so that’s good.
These two quotes are what I'm talking about. His first quote is just ridiculous. Calling me disingenuous for saying that he had more information that he looked like he had just doesn't make sense. My case on him is that he put schadd to L-1 then cast a secret vote to lynch him.
The second quote he is saying that everyone would do something, but he is the only one that it applies to in this game, so it really only applies to him. He says that it is just as valid to say that anyone on the wagon did what I'm accusing him of doing, which is false. I'm saying that he put schadd to L-1 and then had the assurance that he could get a quicklynch, which is much scummier than starting a wagon with no good reason with the hope you could early hammer someone.