Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Roadrunner7671]

Awaclus is town
Ppe whatevs

[2.71828.....]

quote significantly shortened

I think at the moment I'm definitely happy with my vote on Reggie. The weird interaction between him and Gkreig early, followed by his tunneling of TWM with no rhyme or reason, plus the "I had previously said I would be basing my reads off of something superficial" - which to my knowledge was never said in thread are enough for me at this time.

To make reads easier, from this point until an undisclosed later time, I will automatically be scumreading anyone who votes gkrieg and townreading anyone who votes pps.

That doesn't do anything to lessen j reggies strange fascination for gkrieg this game. Crafting arbitrary means to establish reads also relieves you of actually having to create reads that you can be held accountable for later.

My experiment with the TWM wagon had some results, probably haven't let it sit long enough to really get better results, but I will join galzria with

Vote: J Reggie

[Awaclus]

Please people, you're not going to convince Awaclus that he's wrong and you not posting isn't going to convince people that he's right. This is the definition of gumming up the thread.

Telling your scum partners to stop being so obviously O's scum partners?

[Robz888]

Vote Count 1.7

LaLight (1): SpaceAnemone,
mcmcsalot (4): gkrieg, LaLight, JaketheBaseballGod22, The_Wine_Merchant
2.71828 (1): AndrewisFTTW
ashersky (1): iguanaiguana
J Reggie (2): Galzria, 2.7128....
The_Wine_Merchant (5): J Reggie, ashersky, Dylan32, sudgy, mcmcsalot
Awaclus (1): O
sudgy (1): faust
O (1): Awaclus
iguanaiguana (1): Cuzz
AndrewisFTTW (2): pingpongsam, Eevee

Not Voting (3): Calamitas, RoadRunner, Jimmmm,

With 23 alive it takes just 10 to lynch. Day 1 ends on Tuesday, May 23, at 10:00 AM Forum Time.

[LaLight]

Awaclus, are you a Werewolf?

[gkrieg13]

quote significantly shortened

I think at the moment I'm definitely happy with my vote on Reggie. The weird interaction between him and Gkreig early, followed by his tunneling of TWM with no rhyme or reason, plus the "I had previously said I would be basing my reads off of something superficial" - which to my knowledge was never said in thread are enough for me at this time.

To make reads easier, from this point until an undisclosed later time, I will automatically be scumreading anyone who votes gkrieg and townreading anyone who votes pps.

That doesn't do anything to lessen j reggies strange fascination for gkrieg this game. Crafting arbitrary means to establish reads also relieves you of actually having to create reads that you can be held accountable for later.

My experiment with the TWM wagon had some results, probably haven't let it sit long enough to really get better results, but I will join galzria with

Vote: J Reggie

I mean really more people should just be obsessed with me honestly

[Galzria]

J Reggie, where in this quote that you're saying it exists, did you say "I will be basing my reads off of something superficial"?

To make reads easier, from this point until an undisclosed later time, I will automatically be scumreading anyone who votes gkrieg and townreading anyone who votes pps.

Because what you're saying NOW is that the above quote IS "I had previously said I would be basing my reads off of something superficial" - which it's not. At all.

[LaLight]

O +10 people agreeing make 11. Awaclus said there will be 4 townies; 7 scums. 5 mafia and 2 werewolves. The only way to know is to be a werewolf

[Dylan32]

J Reggie, where in this quote that you're saying it exists, did you say "I will be basing my reads off of something superficial"?

To make reads easier, from this point until an undisclosed later time, I will automatically be scumreading anyone who votes gkrieg and townreading anyone who votes pps.

Because what you're saying NOW is that the above quote IS "I had previously said I would be basing my reads off of something superficial" - which it's not. At all.

He was saying that the condition he was basing reads on (votes on those two people) was a superficial condition.  Really, that seems pretty straightforward.

That being said, I just reread J Reggie, and there just wasn't a ton there. A few decent posts, but nothing that makes me not ok with Vote: J Reggie

PPE 1

[LaLight]

vote: Awaclus

[Awaclus]

Have you never played with Awaclus?

That's a good question, actually. LaLight of all people should know how effective my scumhunting technique is, given that I've read him correctly every single time.

That was not the point. Point was why then you don't think Cuzz is town who agrees with O and why the hell you know there would be exactly 4 townies?

Well, there can be 5 mafia and 1 SK, so out of 10 people agreeing with O, that would leave us with 4 townies. Any game in which a townie agrees with O is already a very unfavorable situation so I'm going to leave those situations out of consideration.

[The_Wine_Merchant]

vote: JReggie

back tracking to make up what he thought he found me scummy for.

[O]

Please people, you're not going to convince Awaclus that he's wrong and you not posting isn't going to convince people that he's right. This is the definition of gumming up the thread.

That almost auto-corrected badly...

If Awaclus is gumming up the thread with nonsense, we should just lynch him for his """anti-town""" behavior, whatever that means.

And if being "anti-town" and rude is his standard townie behavior, I have no problem metagaming and policy lynching. Just as Awaclus has no apparently problem policy lynching anyone who pricks his ego, which is the only answer left given how desperately specious his arguments have been.

"Just ignore Awaclus" is a dumb sentiment when we can just lynch him instead.

That being said, I'm also incredibly willing to lynch anyone who has complained about "gumming up the thread" substantially, since that's just about as patently ridiculous IMO.

oh no how can I find imaginary scumslips and instill WIFOM into RVS votes if people are talking in a mafia game, the horror.

[Awaclus]

Awaclus, are you a Werewolf?

No.

[Galzria]

J Reggie, where in this quote that you're saying it exists, did you say "I will be basing my reads off of something superficial"?

To make reads easier, from this point until an undisclosed later time, I will automatically be scumreading anyone who votes gkrieg and townreading anyone who votes pps.

Because what you're saying NOW is that the above quote IS "I had previously said I would be basing my reads off of something superficial" - which it's not. At all.

To be clear - I think the quote IS "basing reads off of something superficial" - but that's not what I'm questioning here. What I'm questioning is the fact that you claim to have SAID that you would be basing reads off of something superficial, which you never did - unless it was in a QT. And the fact that you followed up this supposed statement with actually DOING it, and are now trying to claim that the act of doing it is the equivalent of saying it is scummy.

[Awaclus]

And if being "anti-town" and rude is his standard townie behavior

No, this is as pro-town as anyone can possibly be.

[J Reggie]

J Reggie, where in this quote that you're saying it exists, did you say "I will be basing my reads off of something superficial"?

To make reads easier, from this point until an undisclosed later time, I will automatically be scumreading anyone who votes gkrieg and townreading anyone who votes pps.

Because what you're saying NOW is that the above quote IS "I had previously said I would be basing my reads off of something superficial" - which it's not. At all.

I arbitrarily decided that pps was scum before he posted anything and then later decided gkrieg was town, and proceeded to say I would base reads off of that. That seems pretty superficial.

[O]

And if being "anti-town" and rude is his standard townie behavior

No, this is as pro-town as anyone can possibly be.

we have always been at war with Eastasia

[Dylan32]

I am now slightly less likely to vote O purely to keep someone who is quoting 1984 alive

[J Reggie]

J Reggie, where in this quote that you're saying it exists, did you say "I will be basing my reads off of something superficial"?

To make reads easier, from this point until an undisclosed later time, I will automatically be scumreading anyone who votes gkrieg and townreading anyone who votes pps.

Because what you're saying NOW is that the above quote IS "I had previously said I would be basing my reads off of something superficial" - which it's not. At all.

To be clear - I think the quote IS "basing reads off of something superficial" - but that's not what I'm questioning here. What I'm questioning is the fact that you claim to have SAID that you would be basing reads off of something superficial, which you never did - unless it was in a QT. And the fact that you followed up this supposed statement with actually DOING it, and are now trying to claim that the act of doing it is the equivalent of saying it is scummy.

I really don't understand where you're getting lost here. I said I would be doing something, then later I said I was doing that but used different words.

[Galzria]

J Reggie, where in this quote that you're saying it exists, did you say "I will be basing my reads off of something superficial"?

To make reads easier, from this point until an undisclosed later time, I will automatically be scumreading anyone who votes gkrieg and townreading anyone who votes pps.

Because what you're saying NOW is that the above quote IS "I had previously said I would be basing my reads off of something superficial" - which it's not. At all.

To be clear - I think the quote IS "basing reads off of something superficial" - but that's not what I'm questioning here. What I'm questioning is the fact that you claim to have SAID that you would be basing reads off of something superficial, which you never did - unless it was in a QT. And the fact that you followed up this supposed statement with actually DOING it, and are now trying to claim that the act of doing it is the equivalent of saying it is scummy.

I really don't understand where you're getting lost here. I said I would be doing something, then later I said I was doing that but used different words.

Because to me, this is what I see:

(Somewhere town can't see) J Reggie: "I'm going to be basing my reads off of something superficial"

----------

(In Game) J Reggie: Bases Reads off of something superficial
(In Game) J Reggie: "I said I was going to be basing my reads off of something superficial"

*********

That follows much more to me than:

(In Game) J Reggie: Bases reads off something superficial
(In Game) J Reggie: "I said I was going to be basing my reads off something superficial"
(In Game) J Reggie: *The act of me basing my reads off of something superficial is the same as me saying that I was going to do it*

The second example just doesn't follow to me. It's putting the cart before the horse.

[faust]

Update on lynch pool removals:

RR
LaLight
TWM
iguana
O
mcmc
Andrew
ash

[O]

I'm happy to lynch Awaclus, Roadrunner or J Reggie but at the same time I disagree with most of the other people's reasoning for those people (Galzrias for J Reggie, LaLights for Awaclus...)

[faust]

I like what Galzria is doing with J Reggie.

[faust]

I don't think Awaclus has done anything so far that would be alignment-indicative.