Voting for the same person that faust is voting for is not the same as following his authority. Faust doesn't own that wagon. I've contributed little to set-up talk or theory, so I'm going to contribute my vote, and a wagon of one helps nobody.
I've gotta say that I found that whole case on you super fabricated. And I mean, i scumread you before. now i kinda don't want to lynch you anymore.
You're allowed to suspect me of science denying, it's a free spaceship. Let's be clear here: of course it's a stretch. Of course it's a weak case. There's no such thing as a good case D1. Whoever we lynch is going to be town. I'd give my argument a 2/10 on the convincingosity meter. Everything else gets a 1, maybe a 1.5.
Also, if town gets the roleblock they should definitely consider not using it, at least N1, unless they have a strong scumread.
First off: yeah, Theorel's probably right about this. But the roleblock has to be targeted. If I got it, I would probably roleblock a player early in the order because they're the ones who shouldn't be using a power
Which reminds me: How does roleblocking the roleblockers work?At L-1 should you claim the cards you have?
Don't see how that helps.
As per the new e wagon: On the one hand, it probably would've been my next option. On the same hand, I do have townreads on silver and Awaclus. On the other hand, Awaclus never votes correctly.
Question for Silver: So what's your opinion on e voting for cheesy?
Between CJ, e, and ii, I could vote for the first two. Of course they're town, and of course ii is scum. Or scum's gotten no votes yet. It's always the person you most trust.