Reread of Idplay/ash:
Idplay opens voting for a player that's not in the game. Does that say anything? Well the mildest of town reads because scum has a better idea of who's in the game.
I'm the head of the department of the colour yellow
I get not claiming a role (which I like- I think it's too early), but all that buildup into absolutely nothing seems iffy. I just don't think town would make that threat. However, town!Joseph made a similar type threat in NM9.
Hedgy position on Joseph.
Jokes, I'm UB
Do we believe this? I'm not sure I do
I'm not sure I like this post.
Okay, ashersky takes over now.
Has anyone claimed anything?
Joseph has claimed UB without a counterclaim.
Did whomever I replaced post after that claim so we can assume I'm not the UB?
Seems to be making a point out of claiming that he didn't read his PM. I don't get that. The only thing this does is causing ou to play suboptimally. It makes more sense as a scum lie to me.
Also, not voting RR today.
This is completely out of the blue. ash, care to explain your reasoning here?
He scumreads Robz and me. Which is a fairly comfortable position for scum, because what are the chances that either of us actually gets lynched on D1?
Nice case, actually.
Supports my Robz-is-faust's-partner theory.
In response to Jake's Robz case. I'm sure ash would have been a lot more critical of that post if he did not already have this theory. This post illustrates ash's play which usually is all about confirmation bias. It's towny more than scummy I suppose.
I don't feel it really. Maybe we should just vote: mcmc
Or RR. That would be acceptable as well.
I'm okay with either of those lynches. Mmc is lurking big time. Vote: mcmcsalot
Is there any lynch you are NOT ok with?
Joseph. And also the Wine Merchant: a newbie working this hard on Day 1 should be rewarded with survival.
Huge scum tell here from Robz. Enough to move my vote. vote: robz
Would like to know what you thought the scum tell was here. - Nevermind, was explained later on.
Anybody down for a Roadrunner quicklynch?
I will point out that Faust last mentioned RR as an acceptable lynch candidate.
That's lots of love going on.
I will just point out that it is these kinds of posts that I think tied Robz and me together in ash's head. And they're all coming from Robz; I haven't done any buddying.
Towards the end of the day, ash defends gkrieg and Awaclus. If they're all town, this doesn't really make sense. He also suggests a no lynch.
I mean, I would just never ever ever ever ever ever actually go down this way as scum.
Well I wouldn't have lynched you if you hadn't claimed VT. Just didn't seem that big a loss this way.
Which is why I never claim VT unless I'm actually VT!
Or scum. I'm fairly sure you've claimed VT as scum. Maybe even on D1.
Still, you were the right lynch today, even if you weren't the correct one.
Not exactly sure what this means. There were certainly better lynches than Robz possible.
The Robz lynch was fantastic -- the best possible mislynch. VT is the best role to have to lose, Robz is too dangerous to leave alive if he's not an IC, it gave us a lot of fantastic interactions at the end.
Anyone decrying the lynch as bad is bad.
Also, vote: faust
Do I buy this? Maybe. I mean sure there are worse things than lynching a claimed VT, but what about lynching scum? Also, by that metric (too dangerous to leave alive), we should probably lynch ash next.
So, I'm not sure. There are a bunch of town-indicating posts, nothing that really stands out. I see the overall strategy that ash uses to approach the game as a scummy one though (scumread the players that have been around long enough to know him, so that he can point to OMGUS when they start scumreading him).
On the other hand, I don't really think a scum team with ash in it would kill Calamitas.