Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[faust]

I like a Vote: RR. People were liking voting RR, why did that cease to be a thing?

Mostly because I'm less worried about scum!RR than about, say, scum!EFHW or scum!ash.

This is one of the first things that has really made me take pause about faust.

Not sure if that's a good or a bad thing.

[faust]

Request prod on mcmcsalot

[EFHW]

That said, it's not impossible for scum!gkrieg to have forgotten about killing Calamitas. But it's way less likely than that he's town.

Do you think all his mis-statements in the reread were also due to being disengaged?  I suppose it's possible.  It's not good scum play to post a reread like that.  But he could be a disengaged scum, too.

[EFHW]

I like a Vote: RR. People were liking voting RR, why did that cease to be a thing?

I'm with you.  Just want to sort out gkrieg first, see if that wagon will fly/roll.

[EFHW]

faust, why have you been jumping around so much?  This is the sequence of votes: gkrieg, McG/me, Robz, Joseph, mcmc, gkrieg again, Robz again, mcmc again, RR, TWM, me.  I don't know if you actually think any of us are scum.

Why would I not jump around? I'm trying to figure stuff out.

Just seems like you don't usually put down so many votes.

[EFHW]

And the TWM case was really a stretch.

[mcmcsalot]

Request prod on mcmcsalot

Ugh my post just got deleted.

Basically there was little to no content between 5pm Jan 10 to 11pm Jan 11 and so I didn't feel the need to comment and since then the thread has had 6 pages in 7 hours. I work from 8am to 5pm and only forum if my boss is out or I'm in the bathroom.

So pretty rude to request a prod but whatever man, I'll catch up at 5 and make sure to post for you befor I make dinner for my wife. I'll let her know I might get replaced if I don't post she'll understand

[mcmcsalot]

If I'm not posting enough for you just let me know and I'll replace. I wouldn't want to negatively impact the flow of the game like our ic joking about being a serial killer or jake dancing around calling TWM an ass for 4 posts.

Legitimately irl upset so take it for what you want.

[The_Wine_Merchant]

jake dancing around calling TWM an ass for 4 posts.

Legitimately irl upset so take it for what you want.

I feel you man. I feel ya.

[faust]

faust, why have you been jumping around so much?  This is the sequence of votes: gkrieg, McG/me, Robz, Joseph, mcmc, gkrieg again, Robz again, mcmc again, RR, TWM, me.  I don't know if you actually think any of us are scum.

Why would I not jump around? I'm trying to figure stuff out.

Just seems like you don't usually put down so many votes.

I don't know where you would get that impression from.

[faust]

So pretty rude to request a prod but whatever man, I'll catch up at 5 and make sure to post for you befor I make dinner for my wife. I'll let her know I might get replaced if I don't post she'll understand

It's not rude to request a prod, it's rude to not post enough. Look, it even says so in the OP:

inactivity is just as inconsiderate as rude comments.

[faust]

And the TWM case was really a stretch.

How often do I need to tell you people that a reread is not the same as a case?

[EFHW]

And the TWM case was really a stretch.

How often do I need to tell you people that a reread is not the same as a case?

It felt like a case. I will try to be more precise in the future.

[ashersky]

Seems like I missed a bunch of...oh wait, nothing while I was flying.

Jake/RR -- you need to stop or you will always be lynched for relief.

The further we get from robz's posts, the less scummy Faust begins to feel.

[mcmcsalot]

So pretty rude to request a prod but whatever man, I'll catch up at 5 and make sure to post for you befor I make dinner for my wife. I'll let her know I might get replaced if I don't post she'll understand

It's not rude to request a prod, it's rude to not post enough. Look, it even says so in the OP:

inactivity is just as inconsiderate as rude comments.

Cool, typically inactivity is called out when the person really isn't posting and when they do it's just the sorry I'm behind post and they are never really present for current discussions. I've been active and posted cases/reads and am usually around between 5pm and 11pm to discuss things with people live.

But you are right, I had not posted in an appropriate amount of time to be allowed to request a prod

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

I think that a RR lynch would be a pretty good lynch at this point because he is "acti-lurking" (I think that's the right word) and idk why. Can you explain RR?

[mcmcsalot]

So pretty rude to request a prod but whatever man, I'll catch up at 5 and make sure to post for you befor I make dinner for my wife. I'll let her know I might get replaced if I don't post she'll understand

It's not rude to request a prod, it's rude to not post enough. Look, it even says so in the OP:

inactivity is just as inconsiderate as rude comments.

Cool, typically inactivity is called out when the person really isn't posting and when they do it's just the sorry I'm behind post and they are never really present for current discussions. I've been active and posted cases/reads and am usually around between 5pm and 11pm to discuss things with people live.

But you are right, I had not posted in an appropriate amount of time to be allowed to request a prod

It's a game, I'm sure you didn't mean it the way I took it, my bad. Will catch up when I can.

[Awaclus]

I think that a RR lynch would be a pretty good lynch at this point because he is "acti-lurking" (I think that's the right word) and idk why. Can you explain RR?

You are also acti-lurking. The fact that you think something is scummy that you yourself are doing is quite telling of your alignment.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

I think that a RR lynch would be a pretty good lynch at this point because he is "acti-lurking" (I think that's the right word) and idk why. Can you explain RR?

You are also acti-lurking. The fact that you think something is scummy that you yourself are doing is quite telling of your alignment.

I've also been voting, making cases, postings reads all game where as RR has done none of those things

[faust]

So pretty rude to request a prod but whatever man, I'll catch up at 5 and make sure to post for you befor I make dinner for my wife. I'll let her know I might get replaced if I don't post she'll understand

It's not rude to request a prod, it's rude to not post enough. Look, it even says so in the OP:

inactivity is just as inconsiderate as rude comments.

Cool, typically inactivity is called out when the person really isn't posting and when they do it's just the sorry I'm behind post and they are never really present for current discussions. I've been active and posted cases/reads and am usually around between 5pm and 11pm to discuss things with people live.

But you are right, I had not posted in an appropriate amount of time to be allowed to request a prod

It's a game, I'm sure you didn't mean it the way I took it, my bad. Will catch up when I can.

Sorry, I don't mean to be rude. It's just, you may know that you'll be back in the evening, but we don't. And if possible I would rather prevent having someone be gone for 2 or 3 days before notifying them. I'd rather issue one prod too much than one too few.

[Awaclus]

I think that a RR lynch would be a pretty good lynch at this point because he is "acti-lurking" (I think that's the right word) and idk why. Can you explain RR?

You are also acti-lurking. The fact that you think something is scummy that you yourself are doing is quite telling of your alignment.

I've also been voting, making cases, postings reads all game where as RR has done none of those things

But your vote and your case are awful and you have been posting a ton without any content.

[mcmcsalot]

]
Sorry, I don't mean to be rude. It's just, you may know that you'll be back in the evening, but we don't. And if possible I would rather prevent having someone be gone for 2 or 3 days before notifying them. I'd rather issue one prod too much than one too few.

Completely understandable

[EFHW]

That said, it's not impossible for scum!gkrieg to have forgotten about killing Calamitas. But it's way less likely than that he's town.

Do you think all his mis-statements in the reread were also due to being disengaged?  I suppose it's possible.  It's not good scum play to post a reread like that.  But he could be a disengaged scum, too.

Actually, no.  He is more than just disengaged.  Choosing the mcmc wagon to analyze is contrived and his referring to all the other wagons as mislynches is very strange coming from town.  His allocation of town and scum points seems random at best.  So maybe the Calamitas thing was an honest mistake, but I still think he looks very scummy here.

[gkrieg13]

That said, it's not impossible for scum!gkrieg to have forgotten about killing Calamitas. But it's way less likely than that he's town.

Do you think all his mis-statements in the reread were also due to being disengaged?  I suppose it's possible.  It's not good scum play to post a reread like that.  But he could be a disengaged scum, too.

Actually, no.  He is more than just disengaged.  Choosing the mcmc wagon to analyze is contrived and his referring to all the other wagons as mislynches is very strange coming from town.  His allocation of town and scum points seems random at best.  So maybe the Calamitas thing was an honest mistake, but I still think he looks very scummy here.

I just started at that point.  The only 3 wagons at the EoD were on me, a flipped townie, and Awaclus.  From things that have been said, I was doing the wagon analysis from the perspective that Awaclus was town (if you look at what was happening from the time that I did the analysis).  The fact that you are finding me scummy from all of this is strange.  Have you ever seen me do any of those things as scum?  I mean, you are accusing me of doing contrived wagon analysis, when I didn't just do the mcmc wagon, but did all of them.  I just happened to start at the vote count that I felt best reflected the start of the EoD.

The Calamitas thing was a mistake.  I was just looking at what was happening in that moment, and I'm in a lot of games at the moment, so I have a hard time remembering everything that happened in each of them, especially D1, when I wasn't super engaged.  I don't just check out of games as scum.

[gkrieg13]

I do know that 2 of the wagons were on town, and I have a strong townread on Awaclus ATM.  So my reread saying that anyone trying to stop other wagons from forming is scummy, is completely valid.