Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Calamitas]

I agree with faust that efhw is behaving townie with her case against faust.

I also think faust is also townie for defending efhw, even though she is the one building a case against him

I am ok with the general group think feeling that I am getting saying Calamitas is scum

What exactly is the case on me (except lurking which is not alignment-indicative)?

[SpaceAnemone]

I agree with faust that efhw is behaving townie with her case against faust.

I also think faust is also townie for defending efhw, even though she is the one building a case against him

I am ok with the general group think feeling that I am getting saying Calamitas is scum

What exactly is the case on me (except lurking which is not alignment-indicative)?

Mine was a pressure vote to a certain extent. You haven't said anything alignment-indicative, and that in itself is inconvenient when there are no strong reads flying around.

I think lurking is marginally negative, as these things go. Town have good reason to lurk sometimes (too much work, illness, travel etc), but the utility of lurky behaviour is higher for scum because it lets them fly under the radar for a while, so certain people may well do it more as scum than as town. I don't know whether or not you're one of those people.

I hope your exam today went okay :-)

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

Ok 1. Sorry for anything offensevive I said SA didn't know but your still scum
2. I could see calm or EFHW as scum would be fine with lynching ethier
3.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

Can I get a Vote Count

[Calamitas]

I agree with faust that efhw is behaving townie with her case against faust.

I also think faust is also townie for defending efhw, even though she is the one building a case against him

I am ok with the general group think feeling that I am getting saying Calamitas is scum

What exactly is the case on me (except lurking which is not alignment-indicative)?

Mine was a pressure vote to a certain extent. You haven't said anything alignment-indicative, and that in itself is inconvenient when there are no strong reads flying around.

I think lurking is marginally negative, as these things go. Town have good reason to lurk sometimes (too much work, illness, travel etc), but the utility of lurky behaviour is higher for scum because it lets them fly under the radar for a while, so certain people may well do it more as scum than as town. I don't know whether or not you're one of those people.

I hope your exam today went okay :-)

I haven't been very active on Day 1 with either alignment I think, just because i find it hard to work with so little (or nothing). So in my case, that is absolutely not alignment-indicative.

In terms of reads, I still cannot offer anything at all.

[Robz888]

In terms of reads, I still cannot offer anything at all.

Not being able to offer anything at all is pretty scummy.

[Calamitas]

In terms of reads, I still cannot offer anything at all.

Not being able to offer anything at all is pretty scummy.

This is just wrong. "Scummy" refers to behaviour which is more likely to be made with scum-alignment than with town-alignment (which is obviously different from person to person).
And this is just not the case here.

[faust]

In terms of reads, I still cannot offer anything at all.

Not being able to offer anything at all is pretty scummy.

This is just wrong. "Scummy" refers to behaviour which is more likely to be made with scum-alignment than with town-alignment (which is obviously different from person to person).
And this is just not the case here.

It is anti-town though, so that makes you a better lynch than the average player.

[LaLight]

I haven't been very active on Day 1 with either alignment I think, just because i find it hard to work with so little (or nothing). So in my case, that is absolutely not alignment-indicative.

In terms of reads, I still cannot offer anything at all.

Erm.. This is scummy, you know. You're talking about "either alignment" and no reads. You should have gut reads at least, it's still D1.
vote: Calamitas

[Calamitas]

I haven't been very active on Day 1 with either alignment I think, just because i find it hard to work with so little (or nothing). So in my case, that is absolutely not alignment-indicative.

In terms of reads, I still cannot offer anything at all.

Erm.. This is scummy, you know. You're talking about "either alignment" and no reads. You should have gut reads at least, it's still D1.
vote: Calamitas

This again, is not scummy. I have used the term "either alignment" as either alignment before...

[faust]

Hey Calamiteas, how about you start doing stuff that is alignment-andicative?

[LaLight]

Hey Calamiteas, how about you start doing stuff that is alignment-andicative?

like killing people in the night

[Calamitas]

Hey Calamiteas, how about you start doing stuff that is alignment-andicative?

If I could/would do that on purpose it wouldn't be alignment-indicative anymore

[Robz888]

Hey Calamiteas, how about you start doing stuff that is alignment-andicative?

If I could/would do that on purpose it wouldn't be alignment-indicative anymore

This isn't remotely helpful.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

I agree with faust that efhw is behaving townie with her case against faust.

I also think faust is also townie for defending efhw, even though she is the one building a case against him

I am ok with the general group think feeling that I am getting saying Calamitas is scum

What exactly is the case on me (except lurking which is not alignment-indicative)?

Mine was a pressure vote to a certain extent. You haven't said anything alignment-indicative, and that in itself is inconvenient when there are no strong reads flying around.

I think lurking is marginally negative, as these things go. Town have good reason to lurk sometimes (too much work, illness, travel etc), but the utility of lurky behaviour is higher for scum because it lets them fly under the radar for a while, so certain people may well do it more as scum than as town. I don't know whether or not you're one of those people.

I hope your exam today went okay :-)

I haven't been very active on Day 1 with either alignment I think, just because i find it hard to work with so little (or nothing). So in my case, that is absolutely not alignment-indicative.

In terms of reads, I still cannot offer anything at all.

Your acting very scummy so Vote: Calamitas

[faust]

This is L-1.

[faust]

Bad wagon is bad.

Let's lynch SpaceAnemone or RR.

[Roadrunner7671]

Let's lynch SpaceAnemone or RR.

Both of those wagons are bad as well.

It's D1.

[SpaceAnemone]

Unofficial Space-Count

Jake (3): Roadrunner, EFHW, Calamitas
Calamitas (4): Robz, SpaceAnemone, LL, Jake {L-1}
RR (1): faust

Not Voting (1): e

[SpaceAnemone]

Bad wagon is bad.

Let's lynch SpaceAnemone or RR.

Or try something else :-)

Vote: faust

[Roadrunner7671]

Maybe I can actually get behind that

[faust]

Bad wagon is bad.

Let's lynch SpaceAnemone or RR.

Or try something else :-)

Vote: faust

Do you have anything to offer except OMGUS?

[faust]

And what happened to

I'm intrigued enough about EFHW's behaviour that I want to keep both her and Faust around. The thought that I'm playing directly into a scum trap in this respect has crossed my mind, but it's too early in the game to get too worried about that, isn't it?

?

[Robz888]

Vote: Space Anemone

[Robz888]

OMGUS is bad, covering for it with a smiley face is worse, also directly contradicts his recent stance. And voting faust is not a good idea.