Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10  All

Author Topic: New game (currently unnamed) playtest  (Read 27522 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ghostofmars

  • Moneylender
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 162
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #200 on: November 24, 2016, 03:15:39 pm »
 :P
Logged

schadd

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 892
  • Shuffle iT Username: schadd
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #201 on: November 25, 2016, 09:44:04 am »
bid 0 on 18, buy it
Logged
Quote from: Roadrunner7671 on April 15, 2017, 05:27:50 pm
I thought you thought it was a slip because I said 'Jake's partners' instead of 'Roadrunner7671.'

Seprix

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5607
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #202 on: November 25, 2016, 12:24:58 pm »
No conflicts of interest. Interesting.
Logged
DM me for ideas on a new article, either here or on Discord (I check Discord way more often)

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #203 on: November 25, 2016, 06:23:24 pm »
I'll deal with this in the morning.
Logged
Quote from: Witherweaver on October 29, 2014, 03:10:13 pm
Quote from: Donald X. on October 28, 2014, 04:29:33 pm
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #204 on: November 26, 2016, 04:30:34 am »
Kirian pays BGGR and 6 extra red for Income: BG

Ghost pays GGRR and 1 extra red for the Effect card. I have assumed it will be placed below Income: GRR but let me know if you wish to do differently, Ghost.

Seprix pays BR for 7G.

Schadd pays GR for the Exchange with 5G

Kuildeous... your bid needs a little input I think. I've defaulted to spending 15R, 3G for your bid, but let me know if you want to change that.

Income happens, turn order changes.

Current turn: 3A
Current player: Ghostofmars (first or last)

Current turn order:
Schadd
Kuildeous
Kirian
*Ghostofmars
Seprix

Currently available cards:
Card No.   Effect   Cost   Current Bid
Card 2   1 off: 8G   BRRR
Card 1   1 off: BBBBB   GGRRR
Card 20   Scoring: Score 1 VP per GGRRRR you own   GGGRRR
Card 11   Scoring: Score 4 VP for each B income you have   GGGRR
Card 8   Scoring: You may immediately spend any number of sets of 3G for 2 VP   GGGRRR

Public Scoring Cards
Scoring: Score 7 VP per Scoring card from stage 1 or 2 that you own
Scoring: Score 5 VP per Effect card you own

PlayerRedGreenBlueRed IncGreen IncBlue IncVPs
Kirian376310310
Ghostofmars344012300
Seprix371304000
Schadd481039000
Kuildeous8307100

Link to game sheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Z4JnyGQurC2NJiobtbzCTQ3BA5E7wtRZIqKmkPP1Foo/edit#gid=1357006813
Logged
Quote from: Witherweaver on October 29, 2014, 03:10:13 pm
Quote from: Donald X. on October 28, 2014, 04:29:33 pm
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

ghostofmars

  • Moneylender
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 162
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #205 on: November 26, 2016, 09:22:21 am »
Quote from: Tables on November 26, 2016, 04:30:34 am
Ghost pays GGRR and 1 extra red for the Effect card. I have assumed it will be placed below Income: GRR but let me know if you wish to do differently, Ghost
That's alright. I'll act last again.
Logged

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #206 on: November 26, 2016, 12:27:15 pm »
Are you allowed to convert R to G before scoring card 20?
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #207 on: November 26, 2016, 12:30:10 pm »
Schadd then.

Quote from: Kirian on November 26, 2016, 12:27:15 pm
Are you allowed to convert R to G before scoring card 20?

You can do any number of final conversions when buying your last card.
Logged
Quote from: Witherweaver on October 29, 2014, 03:10:13 pm
Quote from: Donald X. on October 28, 2014, 04:29:33 pm
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

schadd

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 892
  • Shuffle iT Username: schadd
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #208 on: November 26, 2016, 03:58:30 pm »
bid 2 on card 8
Logged
Quote from: Roadrunner7671 on April 15, 2017, 05:27:50 pm
I thought you thought it was a slip because I said 'Jake's partners' instead of 'Roadrunner7671.'

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #209 on: November 26, 2016, 05:29:15 pm »
Current turn: 3A
Current player: Kuildeous

Current turn order:
Schadd
Kuildeous
Kirian
*Ghostofmars
Seprix

Currently available cards:
Card No.   Effect   Cost   Current Bid
Card 2   1 off: 8G   BRRR   2, Schadd
Card 1   1 off: BBBBB   GGRRR
Card 20   Scoring: Score 1 VP per GGRRRR you own   GGGRRR
Card 11   Scoring: Score 4 VP for each B income you have   GGGRR
Card 8   Scoring: You may immediately spend any number of sets of 3G for 2 VP   GGGRRR

Public Scoring Cards
Scoring: Score 7 VP per Scoring card from stage 1 or 2 that you own
Scoring: Score 5 VP per Effect card you own

PlayerRedGreenBlueRed IncGreen IncBlue IncVPs
Kirian376310310
Ghostofmars344012300
Seprix371304000
Schadd481039000
Kuildeous8307100

Link to game sheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Z4JnyGQurC2NJiobtbzCTQ3BA5E7wtRZIqKmkPP1Foo/edit#gid=1357006813
Logged
Quote from: Witherweaver on October 29, 2014, 03:10:13 pm
Quote from: Donald X. on October 28, 2014, 04:29:33 pm
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

ghostofmars

  • Moneylender
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 162
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #210 on: November 26, 2016, 06:08:08 pm »
Rules question: For the purpose of card 10
Quote
Scoring: Score 7 VP per Exchange card you own
does the base card count?
Logged

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #211 on: November 26, 2016, 07:28:10 pm »
Quote from: ghostofmars on November 26, 2016, 06:08:08 pm
Rules question: For the purpose of card 10
Quote
Scoring: Score 7 VP per Exchange card you own
does the base card count?

It shouldn't. I would say rules as written it would, but let's clarify that and say no. It'd be far too strong if it did.
Logged
Quote from: Witherweaver on October 29, 2014, 03:10:13 pm
Quote from: Donald X. on October 28, 2014, 04:29:33 pm
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

Kuildeous

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3840
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #212 on: November 27, 2016, 09:06:41 pm »
Bid 0 on Card 1
Logged
A man has no signature

Kuildeous

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3840
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #213 on: November 27, 2016, 09:07:02 pm »
Also, you spent my resources correctly. I had to review my plans. Pretty sure that's what I wanted.
Logged
A man has no signature

ghostofmars

  • Moneylender
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 162
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #214 on: December 02, 2016, 04:01:53 pm »
Kirian?
Logged

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #215 on: December 02, 2016, 07:54:03 pm »
0 on Card 20
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #216 on: December 04, 2016, 04:20:02 pm »
Current turn: 3A
Current player: Seprix

Current turn order:
Schadd
Kuildeous
Kirian
*Ghostofmars
Seprix

Currently available cards:
Card No.   Effect   Cost   Current Bid
Card 2   1 off: 8G   BRRR   2, Schadd
Card 1   1 off: BBBBB   GGRRR   0, Kuildeous
Card 20   Scoring: Score 1 VP per GGRRRR you own   GGGRRR   0, Kirian
Card 11   Scoring: Score 4 VP for each B income you have   GGGRR
Card 8   Scoring: You may immediately spend any number of sets of 3G for 2 VP   GGGRRR

Public Scoring Cards
Scoring: Score 7 VP per Scoring card from stage 1 or 2 that you own
Scoring: Score 5 VP per Effect card you own

PlayerRedGreenBlueRed IncGreen IncBlue IncVPs
Kirian376310310
Ghostofmars344012300
Seprix371304000
Schadd481039000
Kuildeous8307100

Link to game sheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Z4JnyGQurC2NJiobtbzCTQ3BA5E7wtRZIqKmkPP1Foo/edit#gid=1357006813
Logged
Quote from: Witherweaver on October 29, 2014, 03:10:13 pm
Quote from: Donald X. on October 28, 2014, 04:29:33 pm
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

ghostofmars

  • Moneylender
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 162
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #217 on: December 09, 2016, 11:17:15 am »
 ;)
Logged

Kuildeous

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3840
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #218 on: December 17, 2016, 12:04:06 am »
*whines*

Seeeeeeepriiiiiiiiiix!
Logged
A man has no signature

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #219 on: December 22, 2016, 02:48:45 am »
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

Kuildeous

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3840
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #220 on: December 28, 2016, 08:06:51 am »
Logged
A man has no signature

Kuildeous

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3840
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #221 on: January 03, 2017, 08:57:52 am »
I see that Seprix has not been online for 3 weeks. Seems a bit late to try to rope in another player. Perhaps Tables could take over for him since there is no secret information. It would still provide valuable testing for the game, and he no longer has to keep his distance since we've gone through six rounds of bidding and have a better understanding of the game.
Logged
A man has no signature

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #222 on: January 03, 2017, 12:00:53 pm »
That seems like a reasonable idea. Player COs could complicate things since I know somewhat what some players are planning, but... eh.

I'll see what others think before committing to anything, especially as it has just been the Christmas period so he might just have had a long holiday, but if he's not back soon and nobody objects, yeah.
Logged
Quote from: Witherweaver on October 29, 2014, 03:10:13 pm
Quote from: Donald X. on October 28, 2014, 04:29:33 pm
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

ghostofmars

  • Moneylender
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 162
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #223 on: January 03, 2017, 04:42:16 pm »
I would say, wait for one more week. If nothing changes, find a solution to continue the game. For me it would work if you continue to play for Seprix.
Logged

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2817
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
    • View Profile
Re: New game (currently unnamed) playtest
« Reply #224 on: January 03, 2017, 05:33:27 pm »
I saw Seprix on discord. So he's not just gone.
Logged
Quote from: Witherweaver on October 29, 2014, 03:10:13 pm
Quote from: Donald X. on October 28, 2014, 04:29:33 pm
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10  All
 

Page created in 0.103 seconds with 20 queries.