Well, almost. You seem to hold the opinion that the laws of physics are somehow separate from the consciousness that makes up the universe, while I would say that they are also part of that entity.
I disagree with that summary; I would not describe them as separate.
The analogy I like the most is this. Imagine that instances of consciousness are like the faces of a polyhedron
As you probably know, there is a transformation where you map each face onto its center point. If we do this to the above, we get this:
My position is that matter is like the second thing, and thus the laws of physics describe the second thing. Since the transformation is reversible, you can understand everything by just looking at the second thing. E.g., if you imagine that the polyhedron evolves according to some algorithm, there is an analogous algorithm that makes the center points evolve, and if you just understand that fully, then you can predict everything. In other words, the laws of physics get to be complete.
I like this analogy because the two aspects look quite different, and in particular, if you only look at it from the material lens, it seems like matter is "empty" (like points). But they're not separate, they're two ways of looking at the same thing. It's also called "dual-aspect monism"