Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 ... 53 54 [55] 56 57 ... 72  All

Author Topic: RMM32: The Walking Dead (Game Over.)  (Read 157148 times)

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ampharos

  • Scout
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1350 on: April 11, 2016, 03:21:42 pm »
I mean, I guess there could have been 4.  I just am expecting 3. 
Logged

A Drowned Kernel

  • 2015 World Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1067
  • They/Them
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1351 on: April 11, 2016, 06:00:30 pm »
I might be in favor of a massclaim anyway? It could shed some light on things.
Logged
The perfect engine
But it will never go off
Three piles are empty

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1352 on: April 11, 2016, 06:02:33 pm »
I guess if we had a cult leader, 3 scum is maybe more likely?

Still kinda like a mass claim to help us figure some stuff out.
Logged

A Drowned Kernel

  • 2015 World Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1067
  • They/Them
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1353 on: April 11, 2016, 10:30:56 pm »
Why is no one voting?
Logged
The perfect engine
But it will never go off
Three piles are empty

Roadrunner7671

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1845
  • Shuffle iT Username: Roadrunner7672
  • Forum Mafia Record: 18-33-2
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1354 on: April 11, 2016, 10:31:59 pm »
Logged
Quote from: Haddock on September 13, 2016, 10:34:27 am
Oh God someone delete this before Roadrunner sees it.

A Drowned Kernel

  • 2015 World Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1067
  • They/Them
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1355 on: April 11, 2016, 10:36:22 pm »
But really.
Logged
The perfect engine
But it will never go off
Three piles are empty

Roadrunner7671

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1845
  • Shuffle iT Username: Roadrunner7672
  • Forum Mafia Record: 18-33-2
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1356 on: April 11, 2016, 10:41:18 pm »
Logged
Quote from: Haddock on September 13, 2016, 10:34:27 am
Oh God someone delete this before Roadrunner sees it.

A Drowned Kernel

  • 2015 World Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1067
  • They/Them
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1357 on: April 11, 2016, 10:57:43 pm »
Logged
The perfect engine
But it will never go off
Three piles are empty

Roadrunner7671

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1845
  • Shuffle iT Username: Roadrunner7672
  • Forum Mafia Record: 18-33-2
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1358 on: April 11, 2016, 10:59:57 pm »
Logged
Quote from: Haddock on September 13, 2016, 10:34:27 am
Oh God someone delete this before Roadrunner sees it.

Roadrunner7671

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1845
  • Shuffle iT Username: Roadrunner7672
  • Forum Mafia Record: 18-33-2
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1359 on: April 11, 2016, 11:01:18 pm »
It's scummy to say this out of the blue, but we should massclaim. Depending on the setup, I might be able to do good things.
Logged
Quote from: Haddock on September 13, 2016, 10:34:27 am
Oh God someone delete this before Roadrunner sees it.

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1360 on: April 11, 2016, 11:04:40 pm »
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1361 on: April 11, 2016, 11:05:14 pm »
Quote from: gkrieg13 on April 11, 2016, 06:02:33 pm
I guess if we had a cult leader, 3 scum is maybe more likely?

Still kinda like a mass claim to help us figure some stuff out.
I'd be ok with a mass claim.  Get things kickstarted.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1362 on: April 11, 2016, 11:10:38 pm »
Quote from: Ampharos on April 11, 2016, 01:48:33 pm
I really think we should take a good long look at Sir Martin.

EFHW, WW and ADK are also worth taking a look at.  I guess Hydrad as well.

I was thinking ADK for scum early on, but he's reading pretty towny for me now.  Why is he on your maybe scum list? 

Regarding everyone else, WW also seems towny.  Hydrad's been pretty slippery.  Could be scum.  Sir Martin reads scummy, but I don't have anything specific to point to right now.  gkrieg is a townread.  You're another one I read as scummy earlier.  I don't think much has shifted for me there.  Anyone else?  RR I think is town.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1363 on: April 11, 2016, 11:12:49 pm »
Quote from: Roadrunner7671 on April 11, 2016, 10:59:57 pm
Quote from: A Drowned Kernel on April 11, 2016, 10:57:43 pm
Quote from: Roadrunner7671 on April 11, 2016, 10:41:18 pm
Quote from: A Drowned Kernel on April 11, 2016, 10:36:22 pm
But really.
That's why I'm not voting.
What about the Others?
Let people with swords and guns take care of them.

? ? Voting is for Others, swords and guns are for zombies. 
Logged

Roadrunner7671

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1845
  • Shuffle iT Username: Roadrunner7672
  • Forum Mafia Record: 18-33-2
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1364 on: April 11, 2016, 11:16:39 pm »
Quote from: EFHW on April 11, 2016, 11:12:49 pm
Quote from: Roadrunner7671 on April 11, 2016, 10:59:57 pm
Quote from: A Drowned Kernel on April 11, 2016, 10:57:43 pm
Quote from: Roadrunner7671 on April 11, 2016, 10:41:18 pm
Quote from: A Drowned Kernel on April 11, 2016, 10:36:22 pm
But really.
That's why I'm not voting.
What about the Others?
Let people with swords and guns take care of them.

? ? Voting is for Others, swords and guns are for zombies.
On night one Haddock (an other) was killed by a bladed weapon, which I assumed was a sword.
Logged
Quote from: Haddock on September 13, 2016, 10:34:27 am
Oh God someone delete this before Roadrunner sees it.

SirMartin

  • Pearl Diver
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1365 on: April 11, 2016, 11:20:59 pm »
I'm okay with mass claiming.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1366 on: April 11, 2016, 11:22:19 pm »
Quote from: Roadrunner7671 on April 11, 2016, 11:16:39 pm
Quote from: EFHW on April 11, 2016, 11:12:49 pm
Quote from: Roadrunner7671 on April 11, 2016, 10:59:57 pm
Quote from: A Drowned Kernel on April 11, 2016, 10:57:43 pm
Quote from: Roadrunner7671 on April 11, 2016, 10:41:18 pm
Quote from: A Drowned Kernel on April 11, 2016, 10:36:22 pm
But really.
That's why I'm not voting.
What about the Others?
Let people with swords and guns take care of them.
? ? Voting is for Others, swords and guns are for zombies.
On night one Haddock (an other) was killed by a bladed weapon, which I assumed was a sword.

ok, but voting is still for Others, and one player might have access to a night action with a sword but most of us do not.
Logged

Roadrunner7671

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1845
  • Shuffle iT Username: Roadrunner7672
  • Forum Mafia Record: 18-33-2
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1367 on: April 11, 2016, 11:24:26 pm »
Quote from: EFHW on April 11, 2016, 11:22:19 pm
Quote from: Roadrunner7671 on April 11, 2016, 11:16:39 pm
Quote from: EFHW on April 11, 2016, 11:12:49 pm
Quote from: Roadrunner7671 on April 11, 2016, 10:59:57 pm
Quote from: A Drowned Kernel on April 11, 2016, 10:57:43 pm
Quote from: Roadrunner7671 on April 11, 2016, 10:41:18 pm
Quote from: A Drowned Kernel on April 11, 2016, 10:36:22 pm
But really.
That's why I'm not voting.
What about the Others?
Let people with swords and guns take care of them.
? ? Voting is for Others, swords and guns are for zombies.
On night one Haddock (an other) was killed by a bladed weapon, which I assumed was a sword.

ok, but voting is still for Others, and one player might have access to a night action with a sword but most of us do not.
I've thought of a system: We lynch, the guy with the sword re-kills that person during night. Repeat. Thoughts?
Logged
Quote from: Haddock on September 13, 2016, 10:34:27 am
Oh God someone delete this before Roadrunner sees it.

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1368 on: April 11, 2016, 11:29:03 pm »
Sounds good to me.

I think I should make the mass claim order. Is anyone opposed to this?  I have reasons for choosing the order. But I'll claim them last
Logged

Roadrunner7671

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1845
  • Shuffle iT Username: Roadrunner7672
  • Forum Mafia Record: 18-33-2
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1369 on: April 11, 2016, 11:41:37 pm »
I refuse to claim before a protective role.
Logged
Quote from: Haddock on September 13, 2016, 10:34:27 am
Oh God someone delete this before Roadrunner sees it.

A Drowned Kernel

  • 2015 World Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1067
  • They/Them
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1370 on: April 11, 2016, 11:50:33 pm »
Massclaim is good. Let's do this.
Logged
The perfect engine
But it will never go off
Three piles are empty

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1371 on: April 12, 2016, 12:08:29 am »
Quote from: gkrieg13 on April 11, 2016, 11:29:03 pm
Sounds good to me.

I think I should make the mass claim order. Is anyone opposed to this?  I have reasons for choosing the order. But I'll claim them last
Any order is fine with me.
Logged

Roadrunner7671

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1845
  • Shuffle iT Username: Roadrunner7672
  • Forum Mafia Record: 18-33-2
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1372 on: April 12, 2016, 12:19:59 am »
EFHW's making a long post. The suspense is killing me!
Logged
Quote from: Haddock on September 13, 2016, 10:34:27 am
Oh God someone delete this before Roadrunner sees it.

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1373 on: April 12, 2016, 12:28:07 am »
Ok order is thus. 

SirMartin
Ampharos
Hydrad
Witherweaver
EFHW
ADK
Roadrunner7671
gkrieg13

go go SirMartin

Logged

Ampharos

  • Scout
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42
    • View Profile
Re: RMM32: The Walking Dead (The Third Day)
« Reply #1374 on: April 12, 2016, 07:30:41 am »
I don't know if I want a mass claim.  This is being heavily pushed by several people who I think have a good chance of being scum.  There is so much hidden here for town and I believe we're in a good spot... I really do not like this.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 53 54 [55] 56 57 ... 72  All
 

Page created in 2.309 seconds with 20 queries.