Hey man, no need to get so defensive (about being caught).
You asked why agreeing with you is scummy -- I gave you a reason. Doesn't mean I'm right.
(I am.)
So you seriously think that the scum team is like 4 people and somehow it's also been possible to discuss Joseph's VT claim in response to your proposed plan in a scum QT today?
Yh this is a non-starter really.
It requires 4 scum people, in which case this game is already wildly imbalanced (as a D1 mislynch would lose the game).
No, this is Awaclus twisted something to fit his combative style of play.
I said "agreeing with Awaclus is scummy" and he asked why. I gave a reason.
This has nothing to do with the number of scum in this game, or a plan, or balance, or anything. Why would anyone even suggest that?
We already know there are two scum -- it's in the setup.
Someone agreeing with Awaclus does not require 4 scum.
Awaclus stating a thought process in a scum QT that a partner could agree with does not require 4 scum.
That's all there is to this discussion. People are spinning it up into something more. Go back and read the whole exchange again.