Why is the Apollo game bad? It's been a while, but I remember having fun with it.
Also, because I can't remember if I've commented about it on these forums or not, but because I never played Trials and Tribulations (since it was never released in physical form in Australia), I bought the trilogy from the eShop when it was on sale, played through the first two games again, and am now at the last case of the third game. Oddly, I strongly suspect there have been edits from the original releases - firstly because there have been a couple of cultural references that I'm pretty sure wouldn't have existed at the time I played the originals, and secondly because there's an aspect of the second game that seems quite different from how I remember it (as well as there being a few spots in the walkthroughs that I had to look up that slightly differed from the options I had).
At the end of the last case, you have to present a piece of evidence, and I seem to remember that no matter what evidence you presented, you got a big chunk of dialogue leading to a Bad Ending, except that if you present the right piece it stops just before the Bad End and goes on to the resolution of the case - but the first time I played, because I didn't know which evidence to present, I kept resetting the game and trying each piece in turn and did it before the dialogue changed so I never realised I'd presented the right one. In the eShop version, it's extremely clear that you've presented the right evidence immediately. Maybe it's just my memory going, but it definitely feels different.
